Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Conduct Disorder in Prison: Search for Prospective and Retrospective Recurring and Contextual Elements (CoDiRCE)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02493088
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : July 9, 2015
Results First Posted : April 14, 2017
Last Update Posted : April 14, 2017
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré Aunis

Brief Summary:
The prediction of dangerousness remains a delicate subject, relevant in current psychiatry. Scalable psychopathological elements identified in schizophrenia and mood disorders are considered as most at risk for crime committing. The French High Authority of Health (HAS) recommends to identify and prevent risk situations of violence and to develop research at this level. Some authors have worked on criminal career and became interested in risk factors for aberrant driving behaviors but also in environmental or clinical elements accompanying these phases. To our knowledge, no specific study about contextual elements before misconduct and which could lead to aberrant driving behaviors among individuals diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder has been described to date The investigators propose to follow individuals diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder in prison during 6 months in order to list their conduct disorders and contextual elements upstream of these misconducts. The investigators will also study the effect of contextual factors related to judicial steps on the appearance of aberrant driving behaviors.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment
Mental Disorders Other: Antisocial personality recording of behavior and contextual elements

Detailed Description:
This study aims at identifying elements that can provoke frustration and lead to aberrant driving behaviors. The question is whether there are triggers that occur more frequently for the same subject. If so, these specific contextual elements could be detected in order to prevent violent acts.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Observational
Actual Enrollment : 11 participants
Observational Model: Case-Only
Time Perspective: Prospective
Official Title: Passage à l'Acte en Maison d'arrêt : Recherche d'éléments Contextuels récurrents Prospectifs et rétrospectifs
Study Start Date : March 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date : September 2015
Actual Study Completion Date : September 2015

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Group/Cohort Intervention/treatment
Antisocial personality
Individuals Diagnosed with Antisocial Personality Disorder
Other: Antisocial personality recording of behavior and contextual elements
aberrant driving behaviors and upstream contextual elements of individuals diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder will be recorded during the study




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. The Number of Individuals Diagnosed With Antisocial Personality Disorder in Rochefort Prison With Aberrant Driving Behaviors. [ Time Frame: 6 months ]

Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Percentage of Aberrant Driving Behaviors With Contextual Element Observed Before Aberrant Driving Behaviors [ Time Frame: 6 months ]

    Collected contextual elements were :

    • Disorders in the institution (with a caregiver, frustration with the rules)
    • Difficulty / frustration with an inmate
    • Difficulty / frustration with the entourage
    • Consumption of alcohol or other toxic substances
    • Steps in the judicial process (refusal of parole, reduction of sentence ...)
    • Psychiatric symptoms: delirious, sleep disorders, nightmares The numerator for the percentage calculated is the number of aberrant driving behaviors with contextual element.

    The denominator for the percentage calculated is the total number of aberrant driving behaviors (with and without contextual element)


  2. Number of Observed Situations Per Type of Aberrant Driving Behavior (Auto-aggressive, Aggressive or Other Hetero Transgression) [ Time Frame: 6 months ]

    Auto-aggressive: attempted suicide, any gesture of mutilation (scarification, punching in a wall, etc.) Aggressive: rixes with fellow inmates or prison staff, attempted homicides, sexual assaults, etc.

    Other hetero transgression: Failure to comply with the rules of the institution, illegal entry of illicit objects into the establishment, consumption of toxic materials, destruction of property, etc.




Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Sampling Method:   Non-Probability Sample
Study Population

Individuals diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder have been chosen for this study due to their propensity of aberrant driving behaviors, including torts.

Individuals detained in prison Rochefort and with a despcription fitting a psychopathic profile (impulsive, lack of empathy, repeated misconducts, repeat offenses ...) are informed of the study.

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male
  • Over 18
  • Detention sentence in prison in Rochefort between March and August 2015
  • Positive psychopathy score at PCL-R (Psychopathy Checklist-revised) test: score greater than or equal to 30

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic psychosis
  • Bipolar disorder
  • Women
  • Minors,
  • negative score at the PCL-R
  • Subject under protection measure (curator or guardian)
  • Refusal to participate

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02493088


Locations
Layout table for location information
France
Maison d'arrêt de Rochefort
Rochefort, France, 17306
Sponsors and Collaborators
Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré Aunis
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Pierre PARRY, MD Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré Aunis
Publications:
Haute Autorité de Santé. Dangerosité psychiatrique : étude et évaluation des facteurs de risque de violence hétéro-agressive chez les personnes ayant des troubles schizophréniques ou des troubles de l'humeur. In: Service des bonnes pratiques professionnelles. Saint-Denis La Plaine: Service documentation - information des publics; 2011.
Quinsey VL, Harris GT, Rice ME, Cormier CA. Violent Offenders: Appraising and Managing Risk, Second Edition. American Psychological Association. Washington, DC, US 2006. 462 p.
Moulin V, Favard A-N.
Moulin V, Senon J-L. Évaluation de la dynamique criminelle et des processus qui sous-tendent l'agir infractionnel dans un cadre expertal, 2010.
Litinetskaia M. Dangerosité, délinquance et passage à l'acte : psychopathologie et prédictivité. Annales médico-psychologiques 170. 99-102; 2012.
Côté G. Vers une définition de la psychopathie. Pham TH & Côté. Villeneuve d'Ascq, France: Presse Universitaire du Septentrion; 2000. 240 p.
Balier C. Psychanalyse des comportements violents. Puf. Rouge LF. Paris1988
Gravier B. Violence et psychopathie. Psychiatrie légale et criminologie clinique. Issy-les-Moulineaux : Elsevier Masson, 2013. Les âges de la vie. ISBN : 978-2-294-73163-1; 2013.
Vanderstukken O. Troubles de l'attention et des fonctions executives chez les psychopathes. Université catholique de Louvain;1998.
Etude de Cote G, Sheilagh H, Toupin J. citée par Pham TH, Cote G. Psychopathie : Théorie et Recherche. Septentrion Presse Universitaire; 2000.
Méry B. Diplôme Inter-Universitaire de psychiatrie criminelle et médicolégale. "Organisation du système pénitentiaire " ; Mars 2014.
Hare RD, Neumann CN. The PCL-R Assessment of Psychopathy: Development, Structural Properties, and New Directions. C. Patrick ed. New York: Guilford; 2006.
Cote G, Hodgins S, Toupin J. Psychopathie : Prévalence et spécificité clinique. Psychopathie : théorie et recherche. Paris : Septentrion Presse Universitaire, 2000, p 47-75. ISBN 2-85939-612-8; 2000.
COTE G., HODGINS S., TOUPIN J. Psychopathie : Prévalence et spécificité clinique. Psychopathie : théorie et recherche. Paris : Septentrion Presse Universitaire, 2000, p 47-75. ISBN 2-85939-612-8. 2000.
Ministère de la Justice, Statistiques trimestrielles de la population prise en charge en milieu fermé [Consulté le 30/01/2015]. Disponible à partir de l'URL : http://www.justice.gouv.fr/art_pix/trimestrielle_MF_janvier_2014.pdf - Tableau 1. 2014.)
Pham TH. L'évaluation de la psychopathie. Psychiatrie légale et criminologie clinique. Les âges de la vie. Issy-les-Moulineaux : Elsevier Masson; 2000

Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré Aunis
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02493088    
Other Study ID Numbers: 2014P08040
First Posted: July 9, 2015    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: April 14, 2017
Last Update Posted: April 14, 2017
Last Verified: March 2017
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Mental Disorders