Simulation-based Training for Flexible Cystoscopy - a Patient Transfer Randomized Trial
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02411747 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : April 8, 2015
Results First Posted : June 15, 2016
Last Update Posted : July 22, 2019
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Simulation training in surgical education in Urology specialist training in flexible cystoscopy has been demonstrated a valid and efficient learning instrument. The classical setup with a medical expert introducing the novices to the theoretical background and technics of the procedure is time-consuming and expensive. Directed self-regulated simulation training (DSR) is a validated method in simulation training. The power of testing in DSR and flexible cystoscopy is to our knowledge not known. We introduced a setup in which the novices started by training in a directed self-regulated simulation training environment and informed them that they would be tested by a medical expert afterwards. The intervention group novices were given only written theoretical information and anatomical pictures. The control group were first given a classical oral theoretical introduction by a medical expert and secondly did DSR training. We tested the outcome of the intervention by a validated rating scale for flexible cystoscopy. The novices in both the control and intervention group were tested on patients prescribed a flexible cystoscopy and evaluated by a specialist in Urology.
The main hypothesis was that testing in relation to DSR would result in higher scores on a validated scale when performing a flexible cystoscopy on a patient evaluated by a specialist in Urology compared to a group having a oral lecture before DSR.
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Education | Behavioral: Testing Behavioral: Directed self-regulated simulation training | Not Applicable |
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 32 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Masking: | Double (Participant, Investigator) |
| Primary Purpose: | Other |
| Official Title: | Simulation-based Training for Flexible Cystoscopy - a Patient Transfer Randomized Trial |
| Study Start Date : | February 2015 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | June 2015 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | August 2015 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Testing+endoscopic simulation training
Endoscopic training in flexible cystoscopy by directed self-regulated training with knowledge of a test afterwards, max. time cap 1h45min. 15 minutes of testing with a expert in the procedure. Total max time: 2 hours.
|
Behavioral: Testing Behavioral: Directed self-regulated simulation training |
|
Active Comparator: Oral lecture+endoscopic simulation training
Endoscopic training in flexible cystoscopy by directed self-regulated training, max. time cap 1h45min after a 15 minute oral theoretical lecture by a expert in the procedure. Total max. time: 2 hours.
|
Behavioral: Directed self-regulated simulation training |
- Global Rating Scale [ Time Frame: Two to four weeks after day of simulation training ]The subjects perform a flexible cystoscopy on two different patients and each cystoscopy are being scored by a specialist in Urology (the same in the entire study) using a validated scoring system for flexible cystoscopy, the Global Rating Scale. A previously validated assessment tool, Global Rating Scale (GRS) was used to assess the cystoscopy procedures. GRS is composed of five different parameters: respect for tissue, time and motion, handling of endoscope, flow of procedure, forward planning, and knowledge of procedure. Each parameter is assessed on a five point Likert scale with a minimum of one to maximum of five, giving the total GRS score a range of five to 25. At our institution we have defined a GRS score of three in each parameter (minimum total GRS of 15) as a minimum passing standard.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | Child, Adult, Older Adult |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Senior medical students
- Novices in endoscopic procedures
- Written and oral consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Performed a endoscopic procedure independently
- Lack of language skills
- Lack of written and oral consent
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02411747
| Principal Investigator: | Sarah H. Bube, Cand.med. | Rigshospitalet, Denmark |
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | Sarah Hjartbro Bube, Medical Doctor, Rigshospitalet, Denmark |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT02411747 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
H-4-2014-122 |
| First Posted: | April 8, 2015 Key Record Dates |
| Results First Posted: | June 15, 2016 |
| Last Update Posted: | July 22, 2019 |
| Last Verified: | July 2019 |
|
Medical Urology Randomized Controlled Trial Endoscopy Cystoscopy |

