Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Using Ropivacaine Alone and With Dexmedetomidine

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02393677
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : March 19, 2015
Results First Posted : November 6, 2015
Last Update Posted : November 6, 2015
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Bikramjit Das, Government Medical College, Haldwani

Brief Summary:
80 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II patients, 18-60 years old,scheduled for elective upper limb orthopaedic surgery under supraclavicular brachial plexus block, were included in this prospective study. The patients were randomly assigned to group R (Ropivacaine alone) and group RD (Ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine) (40 patients in each group). Group R received Ropivacaine 0.50% (30 cc) + placebo and group RD received Ropivacaine 0.50% (30 cc) + dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Brachial Plexus Anesthesia Drug: Ropivacaine Drug: Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

After Institutional Ethical Committee approval and written informed consent, a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was carried out on 80 ASA Grade I and II patients of either sex, aged 18-60 years, undergoing various orthopaedic surgeries on the upper limb under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. A power analysis was performed to determine the necessary number of patients for each group based on duration of analgesia. With a 2-sided type I error of 5% and study power at 80%, it was estimated that 38 patients would be needed in each group in order to detect a difference of 35 min in the duration of analgesia between the 2 groups. The study was conducted in two groups of 40 patients each. Patients were randomly chosen by computer-generated random selection to one of the following groups:

Group R: Ropivacaine 0.50% (30 cc) + Placebo Group RD: Ropivacaine 0.50% (30 cc) + Dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg Randomization was performed by an independent statistician and concealed from patients and investigators until completion of statistical analysis. Patients were instructed preoperatively about use of the verbal rating scale (VRS) for pain assessment (VRS: 0 = no pain, 10=worst pain possible). On arrival in the operation room, baseline heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation were recorded. An intravenous line was secured in the unaffected limb and Ringer's lactate was started. Patients were given midazolam intravenous (IV) (0.03 mg/kg) as premedication 10-15 min before beginning each blocks technique. Subcutaneous injection with 2 mL of 2% lidocaine was administered at the needle insertion site. All the patients received brachial plexus block through the supraclavicular approach by an experienced anesthesiologist different from the one assessing the patient intra- and post-operatively. Both were blinded to the treatment groups. Neural localization was achieved by using a nerve locator (Stimuplex® Dig RC, B.Braun, Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany) connected to a 22 G, 50-mm-long stimulating needle (Stimuplex, Braun, Germany). The location end point was a distal motor response with an output lower than 0.5 milliampere (mA).

Following negative aspiration, 30 mL of a solution containing local anesthetic combined with placebo or dexmedetomidine as mentioned above was injected and the use of Dexmedetomidine was off-label. A 5-min compression was performed to facilitate an even drug distribution. Sensory blockade was assessed every 3 min and motor block was evaluated every 5 min within the first 30 min following completion of drug administration. Sensory block was confirmed by pinprick sensation using a 23-G needle in all dermatomes of the brachial plexus (C5-T1) i.e. median nerve, radial nerve, ulnar nerve and musculocutaneous nerve. Sensory onset was considered when there was a dull sensation to pin prick along the distribution of any of these nerves (Grade 1). Complete sensory block was considered when there was complete loss of sensation to pin prick.

Sensory block was graded as- Grade 0 Sharp pin felt Grade 1 Analgesia, dull sensation felt Grade 2 Anesthesia, no sensation felt

Motor blockade was evaluated by the ability to flex the elbow and hand against gravity as follows :

Grade 1 Ability to flex and extend the forearm Grade 2 Ability to flex or extend only the wrist and fingers Grade 3 Ability to flex or extend only the fingers Grade 4 Inability to move the forearm, wrist, and fingers Onset of motor block was defined as the time from injection of local anesthetic mixture until achieving a reduction in motor power to grade 3 or less. The block was considered incomplete when any of the segments supplied by median, radial, ulnar and musculocutaneous nerve did not have analgesia even after 30 min of drug injection. These patients were supplemented with intravenous fentanyl (2 μg/ kg) and midazolam (0.03 mg/kg). When more than one nerve remained unaffected, it was considered a failed block. In this case, general anesthesia was given intraoperatively. Patients were monitored for hemodynamic variables such as heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 80 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Official Title: Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Using Ropivacaine Alone or Combined With Dexmedetomidine for Upper Limb Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Comparative Study
Study Start Date : July 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date : July 2012
Actual Study Completion Date : July 2012

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Arm Intervention/treatment
Placebo Comparator: Ropivacaine
amide local anesthetic
Drug: Ropivacaine
Ropivacaine 0.5% 30 ml was used to block brachial plexus
Other Name: Ropin

Active Comparator: Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine
combination of amide local anaesthetic and alpha2 agonist
Drug: Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine
Dexmedetomidine 1 microgram per kilogram bodyweight was added with 30 ml 0.5% Ropivacaine to block brachial plexus
Other Name: Ropin with Dextomid




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Duration of Analgesia [ Time Frame: upto 8 hours ]

Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Onset of Sensory Block [ Time Frame: 20 minutes ]
  2. Onset of Motor Block [ Time Frame: 30minutes ]
  3. Duration of Motor Block [ Time Frame: 6 hours ]

Other Outcome Measures:
  1. Haemodynamic Changes [ Time Frame: 8 hours ]
  2. Complications [ Time Frame: 2 hours ]


Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 60 Years   (Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 80 ASA Grade I and II patients of either sex, aged 18-60 years, undergoing various orthopaedic surgeries on the upper limb under supraclavicular brachial plexus block.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal
  • Patients with chronic pain (pain lasting more than 12 weeks)
  • Those using chronic analgesic medications (opioid, non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, anticonvulsants, antidepressants)
  • Coagulopathy
  • History of brachial plexus injury
  • Allergy to the study drugs
  • Patients taking other medications with α-adrenergic blocking effect
  • Hepatic or renal insufficiency
  • Systemic infection or infection at the site of injection, and shoulder surgery.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02393677


Sponsors and Collaborators
Government Medical College, Haldwani
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Director: Shahin N Jamil, MD Professor, Aligarh Muslim University
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Bikramjit Das, Assistant Professor, Government Medical College, Haldwani
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02393677    
Other Study ID Numbers: DN57/FM
First Posted: March 19, 2015    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: November 6, 2015
Last Update Posted: November 6, 2015
Last Verified: October 2015
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Dexmedetomidine
Ropivacaine
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Central Nervous System Depressants
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
Analgesics
Sensory System Agents
Peripheral Nervous System Agents
Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists
Adrenergic alpha-Agonists
Adrenergic Agonists
Adrenergic Agents
Neurotransmitter Agents
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Anesthetics, Local
Anesthetics