Clinical Study Investigating the Efficacy of a Mouthwash in Providing Long Term Relief From Dentinal Hypersensitivity
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02226562 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : August 27, 2014
Results First Posted : August 26, 2015
Last Update Posted : August 27, 2018
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Dentin Sensitivity | Drug: Potassium nitrate and sodium fluoride Drug: Standard fluoride dentifrice | Phase 2 |
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 191 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Masking: | Single (Investigator) |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Clinical Study Investigating the Efficacy of a Mouthwash in Providing Long Term Relief From Dentinal Hypersensitivity |
| Study Start Date : | September 2, 2014 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | December 1, 2014 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | December 5, 2014 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Potassium nitrate and sodium fluoride
3.0% weight by weight (w/w) potassium nitrate mouthwash with 0.02% sodium fluoride
|
Drug: Potassium nitrate and sodium fluoride
3.0% w/w potassium nitrate mouthwash with 0.02% sodium fluoride |
|
Standard fluoride dentifrice
Standard fluoride dentifrice containing 1000 ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate (SMFP)
|
Drug: Standard fluoride dentifrice
Standard fluoride dentifrice containing 1000 ppm fluoride as SMFP |
- Mean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 8 [ Time Frame: Baseline to 8 week ]The examiner indicated the participant's response to an evaporaitve air stimulus for each tooth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale scored as follows - 0: Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1: responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score is indicative of an imrpovement in sensitivity.
- Mean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 4 [ Time Frame: Baseline to 4 week ]The examiner indicated the participant's response to an evaporaitve air stimulus for each tooth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale scored as follows - 0: Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1: responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus. A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score is indicative of an imrpovement in sensitivity.
- Mean Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold at Week 8 [ Time Frame: Baseline to 8 week ]The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force was reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the subject whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the subject gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth. At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g.
- Mean Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold at Week 4 [ Time Frame: Baseline to 4 week ]The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force was reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the subject whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the subject gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth. At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g.
- Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale (VRS) at Week 8 [ Time Frame: Baseline to 8 week ]Participants rated the intensity of their response to an evaporative air stimulus using a 10 point VRS scale with 1 indicating 'no pain' and 10 indicating 'Intense pain'. A reduction in the score is indicative of an improvement in sensitivity.
- Mean Change From Baseline in VRS at Week 4 [ Time Frame: Baseline to 4 week ]Participants rated the intensity of their response to an evaporative air stimulus using a 10 point VRS scale with 1 indicating 'no pain' and 10 indicating 'Intense pain'. A reduction in the score is indicative of an improvement in sensitivity.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 55 Years (Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants in good general health, with self-reported history of dentinal hypersensitivity lasting more than 6 months but not more than 10 years.
- Participants with minimum of 20 natural teeth.
-
At screening, a minimum of four, non-adjacent teeth.
- Teeth showing signs of facial/cervical gingival recession and/or signs of erosion or abrasion.
- Teeth with Gingival Index score ≤1 and a clinical mobility of ≤1.
- Teeth that are determined to be sensitive by the participant following a 1 second air blast to the cervical margin.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of chronic debilitating disease which, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect study outcomes.
- Any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, causes dry mouth.
- Tooth with evidence of current or recent caries, or reported treatment of decay in 12 months of screening.
- In the 8 weeks prior to screening use of an oral care product indicated for the relief of DH.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02226562
| United States, Indiana | |
| GSK Investigational Site | |
| Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States, 46825 | |
| Study Director: | GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline |
| Responsible Party: | GlaxoSmithKline |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT02226562 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
202196 RH02492 ( Other Identifier: GSK ) |
| First Posted: | August 27, 2014 Key Record Dates |
| Results First Posted: | August 26, 2015 |
| Last Update Posted: | August 27, 2018 |
| Last Verified: | July 2018 |
|
Dentin Sensitivity Hypersensitivity Immune System Diseases Tooth Diseases Stomatognathic Diseases Listerine Fluorides |
Sodium Fluoride Cariostatic Agents Protective Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Anti-Infective Agents, Local Anti-Infective Agents |

