Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Prediction of Development of Scapular Notching Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02052466
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : February 3, 2014
Results First Posted : February 23, 2017
Last Update Posted : May 9, 2017
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Eric Ricchetti, The Cleveland Clinic

Brief Summary:
The hypothesis is that computer simulated bony impingement of the bone surrounding the spherical glenoid implant (the glenosphere) along the scapular neck on three-dimensional (3-D) computed tomography (CT) imaging analysis is predictive of the location of clinical scapular notching that develops following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).

Condition or disease
Osteoarthritis Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Scapular Notching

Detailed Description:

The Specific Aims are:

  • Determine the relationship between lateral glenoid offset and the development of scapular notching following reverse TSA
  • Determine the ability of 3-D preoperative planning tools to define areas of scapular bony impingement on kinematic simulated shoulder range of motion that predict the development of scapular notching
  • Compare the precision and accuracy of plain radiographs (2-D) versus CT (3-D) for measurement of scapular notching and postoperative implant position following reverse TSA (2-D versus 3-D)
  • Determine the implant and anatomic factors that best correlate with clinical outcome following reverse TSA by retrospective analysis

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Observational
Actual Enrollment : 32 participants
Observational Model: Case-Only
Time Perspective: Retrospective
Official Title: Prediction of Development of Scapular Notching Based on Glenosphere Positioning, Scapular Morphology, and Simulated Impingement-free Motion Using Three-dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis
Study Start Date : January 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date : December 2015
Actual Study Completion Date : October 2016

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine


Group/Cohort
Reverse TSA patients
Patients having undergone reverse TSA at the Cleveland Clinic with a high quality preoperative CT of the operative shoulder and who are at least 24 months post surgery.



Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Actual Versus Predicted Scapular Notching [ Time Frame: At least 24 months after reverse TSA ]
    At minimum 2 year follow-up, compare presence of scapular notching as assessed by 2D x-ray and 3D CT imaging with predicted scapular notching as assessed by 3D computer modeling using video motion analysis of subject range of motion.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Patient Reported Pain, Satisfaction and Function (Penn Shoulder Score) [ Time Frame: At least 24 months after reverse TSA ]

    The Penn Shoulder Score is a shoulder-specific patient reported outcome measure. Best possible score is 100; worst possible score is 0. There are 3 sub-scores: pain (3 questions, 30 possible points), satisfaction (1 question, 10 possible points), and function (20 questions, 60 possible points). Total score is the sum of the 3 sub-scores. For all sub-scores, higher is better.

    The pain questions are based on a 10-point numeric rating scale. Points are added for the pain sub-score.

    The satisfaction question asks the patient to rate their satisfaction with their shoulder. It is based on a 10-point numeric rating scale, with 0 as "not satisfied" and 10 as "very satisfied".

    The function sub-score has 20 questions concerning activities of daily living. The response options are: 0 (can't do at all), 1 (can do with much difficulty), 2 (can do with some difficulty) and 3 (can do with no difficulty). If all activities can be done without difficulty, a score of 60 is achieved.


  2. Shoulder Strength - Flexion [ Time Frame: At least 24 months after TSA ]
    Muscle strength test will be performed three times with each motion and recorded, using the Lafayette Manual Muscle Test System (Model # 01163). Units of output are pounds.

  3. Shoulder Strength - Abduction [ Time Frame: At least 24 months after TSA ]
    Muscle strength test will be performed three times with each motion and recorded, using the Lafayette Manual Muscle Test System (Model # 01163). Units of output are pounds.

  4. Shoulder Strength - Internal Rotation [ Time Frame: At least 24 months after TSA ]
    Muscle strength test will be performed three times with each motion and recorded, using the Lafayette Manual Muscle Test System (Model # 01163). Units of output are pounds.

  5. Shoulder Strength - External Rotation [ Time Frame: At least 24 months after TSA ]
    Muscle strength test will be performed three times with each motion and recorded, using the Lafayette Manual Muscle Test System (Model # 01163). Units of output are pounds.

  6. Active Shoulder Range of Motion - Flexion [ Time Frame: At least 24 months after reverse TSA ]
    Flexion

  7. Active Shoulder Range of Motion - Abduction [ Time Frame: At least 24 months after reverse TSA ]
    Abduction

  8. Active Shoulder Range of Motion - External Rotation [ Time Frame: At least 24 months after reverse TSA ]
    External rotation

  9. Passive Shoulder Range of Motion - Flexion [ Time Frame: At least 24 months after reverse TSA ]
    Flexion

  10. Passive Shoulder Range of Motion - Abduction [ Time Frame: At least 24 months after reverse TSA ]
    Abduction

  11. Passive Shoulder Range of Motion - External Rotation [ Time Frame: At least 24 months after reverse TSA ]
    External rotation



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   Child, Adult, Older Adult
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Sampling Method:   Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients who had a reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty at the Cleveland Clinic from 2004 to 2011 and who had a high quality preoperative CT scan.
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients having undergone reverse TSA at the Cleveland Clinic with a high quality preoperative CT of the operative shoulder and a minimum of two years out from surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All patients having undergone reverse TSA at the Cleveland Clinic with no preoperative CT or a low quality preoperative CT of the operative shoulder and/or less than two years from surgery

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02052466


Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, Ohio
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
Sponsors and Collaborators
Eric Ricchetti
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Principal Investigator: Eric T Ricchetti, MD The Cleveland Clinic
Publications:
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Eric Ricchetti, Staff, Orthopaedic Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02052466    
Other Study ID Numbers: 12-1244
First Posted: February 3, 2014    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: February 23, 2017
Last Update Posted: May 9, 2017
Last Verified: May 2017
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: No
Keywords provided by Eric Ricchetti, The Cleveland Clinic:
Shoulder Joint
Computed tomography
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy
Rotator Cuff Injuries
Arthritis
Joint Diseases
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Rupture
Wounds and Injuries
Shoulder Injuries
Tendon Injuries
Chondrocalcinosis
Crystal Arthropathies