RCT Novasure Versus Novasure + Mirena IUS in the Treatment of Menorrhagia
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01965587 |
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified October 2013 by Mr jonathan pepper MD FRCOG, Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust.
Recruitment status was: Not yet recruiting
First Posted : October 18, 2013
Last Update Posted : October 18, 2013
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Menorrhagia | Procedure: novasure mirena IUS combined | Not Applicable |
Endometrial ablation is a commonly used treatment option for women with heavy periods. It is recommended as an initial treatment. It aims at destroying the lining of the womb to reduce heavy menstrual loss.
A hormone releasing device in the womb (MIRENA®)is another commonly used treatment for women with heavy menstrual bleeding and has added benefit of reducing cyclical pain.
There is an increase in the number of women presenting to gynaecology clinic with persistence of pain or cyclical pain with absent or light bleeding after second generation endometrial ablation (Novasure). This may be due to the pockets of active lining of the womb that remains after ablation or possible adhesions created by the treatment. Most women require surgical removal of the womb (hysterectomy) because of pain or a further surgical procedure to divide these adhesions in an attempt to relieve pain and drain any collections in the womb.
We aim to determine if the combined use of MIRENA® and NOVASURE® (which is the second generation endometrial ablation technique used in our unit) will help in reducing the number of women presenting with cyclical pain and requiring further intervention or surgery. The aim of the current study is to compare between women receiving only NOVASURE treatment and women receiving combined NOVASURE and MIRENA treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding. The primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed at 6 and 12 months by a patient questionnaire. The primary outcome is improvement in quality of life The secondary outcomes include
- Lowering of surgical intervention
- Reduction in pain
- Reduction in amount of bleeding This will be a pilot study to determine if the theory is correct and then a larger powered study can be undertaken
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Estimated Enrollment : | 100 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Single (Participant) |
Primary Purpose: | Prevention |
Official Title: | RCT Novasure Versus Novasure + Mirena IUS in the Treatment of Menorrhagia. A Pilot Study |
Study Start Date : | December 2013 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date : | December 2014 |

Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: novasure mirena IUS combined
novasure mirena IUS combined therapy
|
Procedure: novasure mirena IUS combined
novasure mirena IUS combined
Other Name: Combined treatment Novasure and Mirena IUS |
Active Comparator: novasure alone
Sole treatment with Novasure
|
Procedure: novasure mirena IUS combined
novasure mirena IUS combined
Other Name: Combined treatment Novasure and Mirena IUS |
- Quality of life [ Time Frame: 6 months ]Patient questionaire to assess periods and pain

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | Child, Adult, Older Adult |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | Female |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Anybody suitable for novasure ablation
Exclusion Criteria:
- Mirena IUS is indicated as treatment

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01965587
United Kingdom | |
Walsall Manor Hospital | Not yet recruiting |
Walsall, West Midlands, United Kingdom, ws29ps | |
Contact: jonathan pepper, frcog 00441922721172 ext 7735 jonathan.pepper@walsallhealthcare.nhs.uk | |
Principal Investigator: Subashini Sivalingam, MRCOG |
Responsible Party: | Mr jonathan pepper MD FRCOG, Consultant Gynaecologist, Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01965587 History of Changes |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
Novasure2013 |
First Posted: | October 18, 2013 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | October 18, 2013 |
Last Verified: | October 2013 |
novasure Mirena IUS menorrhagia pelvic pain ashermanns |
Menorrhagia Uterine Hemorrhage Uterine Diseases Genital Diseases, Female Hemorrhage Pathologic Processes Menstruation Disturbances |
Levonorgestrel Contraceptive Agents, Female Contraceptive Agents Reproductive Control Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Contraceptives, Oral, Synthetic Contraceptives, Oral |