Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Workers' Acceptability of a Prototype Integrated and Interactive Pedal Desk (WAPD)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01956071
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : October 8, 2013
Results First Posted : February 18, 2019
Last Update Posted : February 18, 2019
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Corby K. Martin, Pennington Biomedical Research Center

Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to assess full-time workers'impressions and acceptability of a prototype pedal desk. The pedal-desk is a semi-recumbent (upright) portable pedal mechanism that allows workers to complete tasks in a traditional seated position.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Acceptability of Semi-recumbent Pedal Desk Device: WAPD Not Applicable

Detailed Description:

Researchers in recent years have begun to consider how modern occupational practices and environments could be enriched to facilitate increased energy expenditure by replacing sedentary behaviors with opportunities for non-exercise physical activity without competing with time committed to work tasks. The investigators have developed a pedal desk: a semi-recumbent (upright) portable pedal mechanism with a maneuverable and adaptable desktop. While utilizing the pedal desk, workers are able to complete their tasks in a more traditional seated position. Determining workers' acceptability is a key initial step in translating this "sedentary behavior countermeasure" to real workplace settings.

In addition to having their height, weight, body fat percentage, and bioelectrical impedance measured, eligible participants will be asked to complete three tasks while simultaneously pedaling at a sustainable and self-selected pace. The three tasks are: 1) compose and send an email; 2) search a topic on the internet, and 3) complete an on-line questionnaire. The questionnaire that participants will complete was developed specifically for this study, utilizes Likert scales, and is based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. Constructs tested focus on perceptions of using the pedal desk at work and include: behavioral beliefs, normative beliefs, control beliefs, intention, self-efficacy, and an open-ended question soliciting general impressions concerning using the pedal desk at work.

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 44 participants
Allocation: N/A
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
Official Title: Workers' Acceptability of a Prototype Integrated and Interactive Pedal Desk
Study Start Date : January 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date : April 2014
Actual Study Completion Date : April 2014

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Foot Health

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: WAPD
Participants were asked to complete three tasks while simultaneously pedaling at a sustainable and self-selected pace. The three tasks were: 1) compose and send an email; 2) search a topic on the internet, and 3) complete an on-line questionnaire.
Device: WAPD
The objective was to assess workers' acceptability of the Pennington Pedal Desk.




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Pedal Desk Trial Questionnaire [ Time Frame: Visit 1 ]
    Full-time sedentary workers used the pedal desk for 15 minutes while they: 1) searched the internet, 2) composed an email, and 3) completed acceptability ratings using an online Likert scale anchored from 1/strongly disagree to 5/strongly agree. The Questionnaire assessed subjective opinions about exercise and use of the Pedal Desk. No subscale or total scores were generated, and there are no maximum or minimum values. Rather, the number and proportion of participants who rated "strongly agree", etc. on each item was calculated.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   21 Years to 65 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • full-time employee at Pennington Biomedical Research Center
  • between ages 21 and 65
  • self-report primarily sitting while at work
  • comfortable sending emails and searching topics on the internet

Exclusion Criteria:

  • weigh more than 250 pounds
  • have physical limitations that prevent performance of pedaling motions
  • pregnancy
  • pacemaker or metal joint replacement

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01956071


Locations
Layout table for location information
United States, Louisiana
Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States, 70808
Sponsors and Collaborators
Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Corby K. Martin, Principle Investigator, Pennington Biomedical Research Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01956071    
Other Study ID Numbers: PBRC 2013-050
First Posted: October 8, 2013    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: February 18, 2019
Last Update Posted: February 18, 2019
Last Verified: October 2018