ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Safety and Efficacy Study of Apremilast to Treat Psoriatic Arthritis

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01925768
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : August 20, 2013
Results First Posted : June 13, 2016
Last Update Posted : April 6, 2017
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Celgene

Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to determine whether apremilast is safe and effective for treating patients with psoriatic arthritis.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Psoriatic Arthritis Drug: Apremilast 30 mg Drug: Placebo Phase 3

Detailed Description:

This is a Phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apremilast monotherapy in subjects with active psoriatic arthritis.

Approximately 214 subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either apremilast 30 mg BID (twice a day) or identically-appearing placebo, with approximately 107 subjects per treatment group.

This is a 113-week study. The subjects will spend 24 weeks in the double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment phase, followed by 28 weeks of active treatment phase (ie, up to Week 52 visit). The original treatment assignments (apremilast 30 mg BID (twice a day) or placebo) will remain blinded until all subjects have completed their Week 52 visit (or have discontinued). After the Week 52 visit, all subjects in the extension phase will continue to receive treatment with apremilast 30 mg BID (twice a day) until the end of the study (ie, up to Week 104 visit) or until early discontinuation from the trial.

The study will consist of 5 phases:

  1. Screening Phase - up to 5 weeks
  2. Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double Blind Treatment Phase - Weeks 0 to 24
  3. Active Treatment Phase - Week 24 to Week 52
  4. Open-label Extension Phase - Week 52 to Week 104
  5. Post-treatment Observational Follow-up Phase

Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 219 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Phase 3b, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast (CC-10004) Monotherapy in Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis
Actual Study Start Date : September 4, 2013
Actual Primary Completion Date : February 25, 2015
Actual Study Completion Date : November 17, 2016

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

Drug Information available for: Apremilast

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: Apremilast 30 mg
30 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks during the double-blind placebo-controlled phase; followed by 30 mg Apremilast BID for 28 weeks of active treatment phase (up to the 52 week visit); original treatment assignments remain blinded until all participants have completed their 52 week visit or have discontinued. After the Wk 52 visit, all participants in the extension phase will continue to receive treatment with apremilast 30 mg BID until the end of the study (ie, up to Week 104 visit) or until early discontinuation from the trial.
Drug: Apremilast 30 mg
30mg of Apremilast will be orally administered twice daily for 104 weeks
Other Names:
  • Otezla
  • CC-10004

Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Oral placebo BID during the placebo controlled phase weeks 0 to 24; placebo treated participants whose improvement is <10% in both swollen and tender joint counts at Week 16 are eligible for early escape (based on the measure of clinical benefit from their current treatment as evidenced by improvement (or lack of improvement) in 1) the physician (evaluator's) global assessment (EGA), 2) patients pain (pain NRS), 3) the patient global assessments (PGA), and 4) the health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI); Placebo-treated patients who early escape are transitioned to apremilast 30 mg PO BID during the active treatment phase up to their Week 52 visit; all those who complete the 52-week treatment phase will enter an open-label extension phase for an additional 52 weeks or until early discontinuation from the trial.
Drug: Placebo
Identically appearing Placebo tablets will be orally administered twice daily for up to 24 weeks




Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ]
    Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: o Patient's self-assessment of pain (measured on a 0 to 10 unit numeric rating scale [NRS]); o Patient's global self-assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 10 unit NRS); o Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 10 unit NRS); o Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]); o C-Reactive Protein (CRP)


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ]
    HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. A higher score indicates worse physical functioning, and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieve an ACR 20 Response at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ]
    Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: o Patient's self-assessment of pain (measured on a 0 to 10 unit numeric rating scale [NRS]); o Patient's global self-assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 10 unit NRS); o Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 10 unit NRS); o Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]); o C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

  3. Change From Baseline in the 28-joint Disease Activity Score Using C-reactive Protein as the Acute-phase Reactant (DAS28 [CRP]) at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ]

    The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables:

    • 28 tender joint count
    • 28 swollen joint count, which do not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee;
    • C-reactive protein (CRP)
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) scores range from 0 to 9.4. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement

  4. Change From Baseline in the Medical Outcomes Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) V2 Physical Function Domain Score Change at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ]
    The SF-36 (v 2.0) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). Norm-based scores were used in analyses, calibrated so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. The physical functioning domain assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.

  5. Change From Baseline in the SF-36V2 Physical Component Summary Score at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ]
    The SF-36 (v 2.0) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). Norm-based scores were used in analyses, calibrated so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. The physical functioning domain assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.

  6. Change From Baseline in the Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ]
    Morning stiffness was the participant's assessment of how long their morning stiffness lasted after first waking up in the morning, on average, during the previous week. A negative change from the baseline duration indicates an improvement.

  7. Percentage of Participants Whose Severity of Morning Stiffness at Week 24 Improved From Baseline [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 ]
    Morning stiffness severity was the participant's assessment of how severe their morning stiffness was after first waking up in the morning, on average, during the previous week. The severity was recorded as none, mild, moderate, moderately severe, or very severe. Improvement is defined as the change from baseline of a more severe assessment to less severe assessment.

  8. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ]
    HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. A higher score indicates worse physical functioning, and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

  9. Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score DAS28 (CRP) at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ]

    The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables:

    • 28 tender joint count
    • 28 swollen joint count, which do not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee;
    • C-reactive protein (CRP)
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) scores range from 0 to 9.4. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement

  10. Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) V 2.0 Physical Functioning Domain at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ]
    The SF-36 (v 2.0) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). Norm-based scores were used in analyses, calibrated so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. The physical functioning domain assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.

  11. Change From Baseline in the Duration of Morning Stiffness at Week 16 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ]
    Morning stiffness was the participant's assessment of how long their morning stiffness lasted after first waking up in the morning, on average, during the previous week. A negative change from the baseline duration indicates an improvement.

  12. Percentage of Participants Whose Severity of Morning Stiffness at Week 16 Improved From Baseline [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16 ]
    Morning stiffness severity was the participant's assessment of how severe their morning stiffness was after first waking up in the morning, on average, during the previous week. The severity was recorded as none, mild, moderate, moderately severe, or very severe. Improvement is defined as the change from baseline of a more severe assessment to less severe assessment.

  13. Percentage of Participants Who Achieve an ACR 20 Response at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 20 [ Time Frame: Baseline and at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 20 ]
    Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: o Patient's self-assessment of pain (measured on a 0 to 10 unit numeric rating scale [NRS]); o Patient's global self-assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 10 unit NRS); o Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 10 unit NRS); o Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]); o C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

  14. Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Weeks 52 and 104 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104 ]
    Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: o Patient's self-assessment of pain (measured on a 0 to 10 unit numeric rating scale [NRS]); o Patient's global self-assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 10 unit NRS); o Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 10 unit NRS); o Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index [HAQ-DI]); o C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

  15. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Weeks 52 and 104 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104 ]
    HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. A higher score indicates worse physical functioning, and a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

  16. Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 52 and 104 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104 ]

    The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables:

    • 28 tender joint count
    • 28 swollen joint count, which do not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee;
    • C-reactive protein (CRP)
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) scores range from 0 to 9.4. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement

  17. Change From Baseline in 36-item SF-36 (V2.0) Physical Functioning Component Scores and Summary Score at Weeks 52 and 104 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104 ]
    The SF-36 (v 2.0) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). Norm-based scores were used in analyses, calibrated so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. The physical functioning domain assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.

  18. Change From Baseline in the Duration of Morning Stiffness at Weeks 52 and 104 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104 ]
    Morning stiffness was the participant's assessment of how long their morning stiffness lasted after first waking up in the morning, on average, during the previous week. A negative change from the baseline duration indicates an improvement.

  19. Change From Baseline in the Severity of Morning Stiffness at Weeks 52 and 104 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 52 and 104 ]
    Morning stiffness severity was the participant's assessment of how severe their morning stiffness was after first waking up in the morning, on average, during the previous week. The severity was recorded as none, mild, moderate, moderately severe, or very severe. Improvement is defined as the change from baseline of a more severe assessment to less severe assessment.

  20. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the 24 Week Placebo Controlled Phase [ Time Frame: Start of the lst dose of IP to the end of the PBO controlled phase; Weeks 0-24 for those randomized to APR 30 mg; Weeks 0-24 for those randomized to PBO who did not enter EE at Week 16; Weeks 0-16 for those randomized to PBO who entered EE at Week 16 ]
    A TEAE is an AE with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of Investigational Product (IP). An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence, that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, including laboratory test values regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) was considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward adverse event that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or a condition that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males or females, 18 years and older at time of consent.
  2. Must understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent document prior to any study related assessments/procedures being conducted.
  3. Able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.
  4. Have a documented diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (by any criteria) of at least 3 months' duration
  5. Meet the classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis (CASPAR) at the time of screening.
  6. Have at least 3 swollen AND at least 3 tender joints.
  7. Must have high sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP) of at least 0.5 mg/dL at screening and at baseline.
  8. Must be receiving treatment on an outpatient basis.
  9. Must be tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker naive and other Biologic naïve for dermatologic and rheumatic conditions
  10. Subjects taking disease modifying anti-rheumatoid drugs (DMARDs), with the exception of cyclosporine and leflunomide (see 7.3. Exclusion Criteria 20, 21), do not require a washout, however, they must discontinue the DMARD treatment at least one day prior to their baseline visit (ie, Visit 2, Day 0)
  11. Subjects who have been previously treated with leflunomide will require a 12-week washout or treatment with the cholestyramine, per leflunomide prescribing label (ie. 8 g cholestyramine 3 times daily for 11 days.
  12. Subjects who have been previously treated with cyclosporine will require a 4-week washout prior to randomization to participate in the study
  13. If taking oral corticosteroids, must be on a stable dose of prednisone less than or equal to 10 mg/day or equivalent for at least 30 days prior to baseline visit (ie, Day 0)
  14. If taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or narcotic analgesics, must be on stable dose for at least 30 days prior to baseline visit (ie, Day 0) and until they have completed the Week 24 study visit.
  15. Must meet the following laboratory criteria:

    • White blood cell count greater than 3000/mm^3 (greater than 3.0 X 10^9/L) and less than 14,000/mm^3 (less than 14 X 10^9/L)
    • Platelet count at least 100,000/mm^3 (at least 100 X 10^9/L)
    • Serum creatinine less than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL (less than or equal to 132.6 μmol/L)
    • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) less than or equal to twice upper limit of normal (ULN). If initial test shows ALT or AST greater than 2 times the ULN, one repeat test is allowed during the screening period.
    • Total bilirubin less than or equal to 2 mg/dL (less than or equal to 34 μmol/L) or Albumin greater than LLN. If initial test result is greater than 2 mg/dL, one repeat test is allowed during the screening period.
    • Hemoglobin at least 9 g/dL (at least 5.6 mmol/L)
    • Hemoglobin A1c less than or equal to 9.0%
  16. All females of childbearing potential (FCBP) must use one of the approved contraceptive options as described below while on investigational product and for at least 28 days after administration of the last dose of the investigational product.

    At the time of study entry, and at any time during the study when a female subject of childbearing potential's contraceptive measures or ability to become pregnant changes, the investigator will educate the subject regarding contraception options and the correct and consistent use of effective contraceptive methods in order to successfully prevent pregnancy.

    Females of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at Screening and Baseline. All FCBP subjects who engage in activity in which conception is possible must use one of the approved contraceptive options described below:

    Option 1: Any one of the following highly effective methods: hormonal contraception (oral, injection, implant, transdermal patch, vaginal ring); intrauterine device (IUD); tubal ligation; or partner's vasectomy; OR Option 2: Male or female condom (latex condom or non latex condom NOT made out of natural [animal] membrane [for example, polyurethane]; PLUS one additional barrier method: (a) diaphragm with spermicide; (b) cervical cap with spermicide; or (c) contraceptive sponge with spermicide.

  17. Male subjects (including those who have had a vasectomy) who engage in activity in which conception is possible must use barrier contraception (male latex condom or nonlatex condom NOT made out of natural [animal] membrane [for example, polyurethane]) while on investigational product and for at least 28 days after the last dose of investigational product.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of clinically significant (as determined by the investigator) cardiac, endocrine, pulmonary, neurologic, psychiatric, hepatic, renal, hematologic, immunologic disease, or other major uncontrolled disease.
  2. Any condition, including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study or confounds the ability to interpret data from the study.
  3. Clinically significant abnormality on a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) at Screening.
  4. Pregnant or breast feeding.
  5. History of allergy to any component of the investigational product.
  6. Hepatitis B surface antigen positive at screening.
  7. Hepatitis C antibody positive at screening.
  8. History of positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or congenital or acquired immunodeficiency (eg, Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disease).
  9. Active tuberculosis or a history of incompletely treated tuberculosis.
  10. Clinically significant abnormality based upon chest radiograph with at least posterior-anterior (PA) view (the radiograph must be taken within 12 weeks prior to Screening or during the Screening visit). An additional lateral view is strongly recommended but not required.
  11. Active substance abuse or a history of substance abuse within 6 months prior to Screening.
  12. Bacterial infections requiring treatment with oral or injectable antibiotics, or significant viral or fungal infections, within 4 weeks of Screening. Any treatment for such infections must have been completed and the infection cured, at least 4 weeks prior to Screening.
  13. Malignancy or history of malignancy, except for:

    1. treated [ie, cured] basal cell or squamous cell in situ skin carcinomas;
    2. treated [ie, cured] cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] or carcinoma in situ of the cervix with no evidence of recurrence within the previous 5 years.
  14. Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned major surgery within 6 months following randomization.
  15. Erythrodermic, guttate, or generalized pustular psoriasis at randomization.
  16. Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than PsA, including, but not limited to: systemic lupus erythematosis (SLE), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), scleroderma, polymyositis, or fibromyalgia.
  17. Functional Class IV, as defined by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Classification of Functional Status in Rheumatoid Arthritis.
  18. Prior history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than PsA (eg, gout, reactive arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis, Lyme disease).
  19. Prior treatment with more than one non-biologic DMARD
  20. Use of the following systemic therapy(ies) within 4 weeks of randomization: cyclosporine or other calcineurin inhibitors, corticosteroids exceeding 10 mg daily prednisone equivalent, as well as other oral agents such as retinoids, mycophenolate, thioguanine, hydroxyurea, sirolimus, tacrolimus.
  21. Use of leflunomide within 12 weeks of randomization, unless subject has taken cholestyramine, 8g TID (three times a day) x 11 days after stopping leflunomide.
  22. Previous treatment with biologic agents for rheumatic diseases such as, but not limited to: adalimumab, abatacept, canakinumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rilonacept, certolizumab pegol, or tocilizumab.
  23. Previous treatment with biologic agents for dermatologic diseases such as alefacept, anti-TNFs (eg etanercept, adalinumab) or ustekinumab.
  24. Previous treatment with tofacitinib, Anti IL-17 agents or secukinumab
  25. Previous treatment with any cell depleting therapies, including investigational agents (eg, rituximab, alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab, alemtuzumab, anti-CD4, anti-CD5, anti-CD3, anti-CD19, and anti-CD20).
  26. Treatment with intravenous gamma globulin, plasmapheresis, or Prosorba® column
  27. Any previous treatment with alkylating agents such as cyclophosphamide or chlorambucil, or with total lymphoid irradiation.
  28. Prior treatment with any non-biologic DMARDS other than methotrexate, sulfasalazine, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, azathioprine, fumeric acid esters, cyclosporine, or leflunomide
  29. Prior treatment with apremilast, or participation in a clinical study, involving apremilast
  30. Use of any investigational drug within 4 weeks of randomization, or 5 pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic half lives, if known (whichever is longer).

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01925768


  Hide Study Locations
Locations
United States, Alabama
Achieve Clinical Research LLC
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35216
United States, California
Desert Medical Advances
Palm Desert, California, United States, 92260
United States, Florida
Bay Area Arthritis and Osteoporosis
Brandon, Florida, United States, 33511
Health Point Medical Group
Brandon, Florida, United States, 33511
Palmetto Medical Research
Hialeah, Florida, United States, 33016
Jeffrey Alper MD Research
Naples, Florida, United States, 34102
Suncoast Clinical Research
New Port Richey, Florida, United States, 34652
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612-4799
United States, Idaho
Coeur D'Alene Arthritis Clinic
Coeur D'Alene, Idaho, United States, 83814
United States, Illinois
Rockford Orthopedic Associates, LLC
Rockford, Illinois, United States, 61107
United States, Michigan
Advanced Rheumatology
Lansing, Michigan, United States, 48910
United States, Montana
Research West Incorporated
Kalispell, Montana, United States, 59901
United States, Nebraska
Heartland Clinical Research, Inc.
Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68134
United States, North Carolina
Physicians East
Greenville, North Carolina, United States, 27834
Piedmont Medical Research Associates Inc
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103-3914
United States, Pennsylvania
Altoona Center for Clinical Research
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States, 16635
United States, Tennessee
West Tennessee Research Institute
Jackson, Tennessee, United States, 38305
Ramesh C Gupta MD
Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38119
United States, Texas
Austin Regional Clinic
Austin, Texas, United States, 78731
Baylor Research Institute
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
Houston Medical Research
Houston, Texas, United States, 77090
Arthritis and Osteoporosis Associates LLP
Lubbock, Texas, United States, 79424
United States, Utah
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
United States, West Virginia
Mountain State Clinical Research
Clarksburg, West Virginia, United States, 26301
Australia, Western Australia
Colin Bayliss Research and Teaching Unit
Victoria Park, Western Australia, Australia, 6100
Australia
Eastern Health Clinical School
Box Hill, Australia, 3128
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Camperdown, Australia, 2050
Menzies Centre for Population Health Research
Hobart,, Australia, 7000
Optimus Clinical Research Pty. Ltd
Kogarah, Australia, 2217
Coastal Joint Care
Maroochydore, Australia, 4558
Westmead Cancer Care Center
Westmead, NSW, Australia, 2145
Canada, British Columbia
Manna Research
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6J 1S3
Canada, Manitoba
Manitoba Clinic
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3A1M3
Canada, Newfoundland and Labrador
Karma Clinical Trials
Saint John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, A1A 4Y3
Nexus Clinical Research
St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, A1A 5E8
Canada, Ontario
MAC Research Incorporated
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 2B6
Arthur Karasik Private Practice
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M9C 5N2
Manna Research
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M9W4L6
Jude Rodrigues Private Practice
Windsor, Ontario, Canada, N8X 5A6
Canada
CHUL du CHU de Quebec
Quebec, Canada, G1V 4G2
Czech Republic
Revmatologicky ustav
Praha 2, Czech Republic, 128 50
Revmatologicka Ambulance
Praha 4, Czech Republic, 140 00
Revmatologicka Ambulance
Sokolov, Czech Republic, 356 01
PV - MEDICAL, s.r.o.
Zlin, Czech Republic, 760 01
Estonia
Innomedica Medical and Research Centre
Tallinn, Estonia, EE-10117
East Tallinn Central Hospital
Tallinn, Estonia, EE-11412
Clinical Research Centre Ltd
Tartu, Estonia, 50106
Hungary
Qualiclinic kft
Budapest, Hungary, 1036
Debreceni Egyetem Orvos- es Egeszsegtudomanyi Centrum
Debrecen, Hungary, 4032
MAV Korhaz es Rendelointezet Szolnok
Szolnok, Hungary, 5000
Veszprém Megyei Önkormányzat Csolnoky Ferenc Kórház-Rendelöintézet
Veszprém, Hungary, 8200
New Zealand
Waikato hospital
Hamilton, New Zealand, 3204
Middlemore Clinical Trials
Manukau, New Zealand, 1640
Timaru Hospital
Timaru, New Zealand, 8601
Romania
Sf. Maria Clinical Hospital
Bucharest, Romania, 011172
Emergency County Clinical Hospital
Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 400006
Sf Apostol Andrei Emergency Clinical County Hospital
Galati, Romania, 800578
SC Covamed SRL
Sfantu Gheorghe, Covasna, Romania, 520052
Russian Federation
Research Medical Complex Vashe Zdorovie
Kazan, Russian Federation, 420103
Penza Regional Clinical Hospital n.a. N.N. Burdenko
Penza, Russian Federation, 440026
Departmental Hospital at Smolensk Station RZhD JSC
Smolensk, Russian Federation, 214025
Yaroslavl Regional Clinical Hospital
Yaroslavl, Russian Federation, 150062
Spain
Hospital Universitario a Coruna
A Coruña, Spain, 15006
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
Barcelona, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain, 08907
Hospital Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, Spain, 08035
Hospital de Basurto-Osakidetza
Bilbao, Spain, 48013
Hospital Universitario de Canarias
La Laguna, Spain, 38320
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, Spain, 28046
Hospital General Carlos Haya
Málaga, Spain, 29009
Corporacion Sanitaria Parc Tauli
Sabadell, Spain, 08208
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago
Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 15706
Sponsors and Collaborators
Celgene
Investigators
Study Director: Lilia Pineda, MD Celgene Corporation

Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Responsible Party: Celgene
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01925768     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: CC-10004-PSA-006
First Posted: August 20, 2013    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: June 13, 2016
Last Update Posted: April 6, 2017
Last Verified: April 2017

Keywords provided by Celgene:
Apremilast, Psoriatic Arthritis, PDE4 inhibitor

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Arthritis
Arthritis, Psoriatic
Joint Diseases
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Spondylarthropathies
Spondylarthritis
Spondylitis
Spinal Diseases
Bone Diseases
Psoriasis
Skin Diseases, Papulosquamous
Skin Diseases
Apremilast
Thalidomide
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
Analgesics
Sensory System Agents
Peripheral Nervous System Agents
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Anti-Inflammatory Agents
Antirheumatic Agents
Immunosuppressive Agents
Immunologic Factors
Leprostatic Agents
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Anti-Infective Agents
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
Angiogenesis Modulating Agents
Growth Substances