Extended Dosing With Eltrombopag for Severe Aplastic Anemia
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01891994|
Recruitment Status : Active, not recruiting
First Posted : July 3, 2013
Results First Posted : December 4, 2018
Last Update Posted : December 4, 2018
- Eltrombopag is a drug being tested for treating severe aplastic anemia. It can help improve blood counts in these patients. However, researchers do not know how long the drug can and should be taken for this type of anemia.
- To look at whether 6 months of treatment with eltrombopag can improve patient s blood counts.
- Individuals at least 2 years of age who are taking eltrombopag for severe aplastic anemia.
- Participants will take eltrombopag by mouth once a day for 6 months.
- Blood samples will be collected every 2 weeks for the first 6 months. Bone marrow samples will be collected at 3 and 6 months. These samples will look at the effects of the study drug on the marrow.
- Participants will continue to take the study drug for as long as it is effective and if the side effects are not severe.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Severe Aplastic Anemia (SAA)||Drug: Eltrombopag||Phase 2|
Hide Detailed Description
Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a life-threatening blood disease that can be successfully treated with immunosuppressive drug regimens or allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, 20-40% of patients are ineligible for transplant due to lack of an appropriate donor, age, or comorbidities. Immunosuppression can be more broadly utilized, but about 1/3 of patients do not respond to a single course of horse ATG and cyclosporine and have persistent severe cytopenias. Among patients who do respond to immunosuppression, responses may be partial, with persistent thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and/or anemia. About 30% of responding patients either relapse or are dependent on continued cyclosporine administration. Patients with refractory severe cytopenias are at risk of dying from infection or bleeding, and they require regular platelet and/or red blood cell transfusions, which are expensive and inconvenient, Patients with refractory SAA are also at risk for progression to other hematologic disorders, including myelodysplasia and leukemia.
Thrombopoietin (TPO) was first identified as the principal protein regulating platelet production, and it stimulates the proliferation of megakaryocytes and release of platelets. TPO was later shown to stimulate proliferation of more primitive bone marrow stem and progenitor cells in vitro and in animal models, suggesting it could have an impact of production of red and white blood cells as well as platelets.
The 2nd generation oral small molecule TPO-agonist eltrombopag (Promacta ) has been shown to increase platelets in healthy subjects and in thrombocytopenic patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infection. Eltrombopag has been well-tolerated in clinical trials, and unlike recombinant TPO, it does not induce autoantibodies. Eltrombopag received FDA accelerated approval on November 20, 2008 for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura who have had an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, or splenectomy. In November 2012, FDA approval was received for hepatitis C associated thrombocytopenia.
We conducted a pilot dose finding study in patients with severe aplastic anemia who had refractory thrombocytopenia following standard immunosuppressive therapy. Patients began at a dose of 50 mg/day and escalated every two weeks to a maximum dose of 150 mg/day. We reported that 11 of 25 patients (44%) achieved hematological response in at least one lineage following 12 weeks of dose-escalating eltrombopag therapy, with minimal toxicity. Responding patients as assessed at 12 weeks were invited to continue on drug in an extension phase. With a median follow-up of 27 months on drug, 7 eventually became tri-lineage responders. Nine became transfusion-independent for platelets (median increase in platelet count 34,000/micro l), six had improved hemoglobin levels (median increase of 3.8g/dL), including three previously dependent on red cell transfusions achieving transfusion-independence, and eight exhibiting increased neutrophil counts (median increase 590 cells/mico L). Serial bone marrow biopsies demonstrated normalization of tri-lineage hematopoiesis in responders, without increased fibrosis.
In the previous study, response assessment occurred at 12 weeks, and patients not fulfilling response criteria at that time had the drug discontinued. Several patients began to have detectable changes in transfusion requirements or blood counts by 12 weeks, but did not fulfill response criteria by that time point and therefore had to discontinue eltrombopag. Other patients who barely met response criteria at 12 weeks showed very marked further improvements in blood counts in all lineages during the extension phase, in some cases not reaching maximal responses until one year after initiating eltrombopag. We hypothesize that a larger fraction of patients may respond if eltrombopag is continued for longer than 12 weeks.
We, therefore propose a follow-up Phase 2 study giving eltrombopag treatment for 24 weeks prior to definitive response assessment, and initiating study medication at a fixed dose of 150 mg/day (75 mg /day for individuals of East Asian ethnicity), given lack of toxicity at that dose in the prior study, and no evidence for response in any patient during dose escalation prior to reaching this dose. Responses will be assessed in all three lineages. Subjects with platelet, red cell, and/or neutrophil responses at 24 weeks may continue study medication (extended access) until they meet off study criteria.
The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of 6 months of eltrombopag administration in improving bone marrow function in SAA patients with persistent severe cytopenias refractory to treatment with immunosuppressive treatment.
Secondary objectives include assessment of relapse or clonal evolution, pre-treatment characteristics predicting response, and the impact of treatment and treatment response on quality of life.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Actual Enrollment :||40 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Single Group Assignment|
|Masking:||None (Open Label)|
|Official Title:||Extended Dosing With Eltrombopag in Refractory Severe Aplastic Anemia|
|Study Start Date :||June 28, 2013|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||October 16, 2017|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||December 31, 2021|
administration of eltrombopag for 6 months
administration of eltrombopag for 6 months
- The Portion of Drug Responders as Defined by Hematologic Improvements [ Time Frame: 24 weeks ]Defined as unilineage or multilineage recovery by 1 or more of the following: 1) platelet response (increase to 20 × 103/μL above baseline or stable platelet counts with transfusion independence for a minimum of 8 weeks in those who were transfusion dependent on entry into the protocol); (2) erythroid response (when pretreatment hemoglobin was <9 g/dL, defined as an increase in hemoglobin by 1.5 g/dL or, in transfused patients, a reduction in the units of packed red blood cell transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 transfusions for 8 consecutive weeks, compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 weeks); and (3) neutrophil response (when pretreatment absolute neutrophil count [ANC] of <0.5 × 103/μL as at least a 100% increase in ANC, or an ANC increase >0.5 × 103/μL, and the toxicity profile as measured using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events).
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01891994
|United States, Maryland|
|National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike|
|Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20892|
|Principal Investigator:||Cynthia E Dunbar, M.D.||National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)|