"Eye Protection After Mydriatic Use for ROP Screening: Impact on Vitals Signs and Pain Scores"
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01860534 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : May 22, 2013
Results First Posted : January 14, 2016
Last Update Posted : January 14, 2016
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Light Sensitivity | Behavioral: eye covers | Not Applicable |
Pain management for Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening focuses on pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions during the actual eye examination. Management of pain related to increased light sensitivity during the post-mydriasis period has not been described.
This prospective, randomized study evaluated the impact of protecting the eyes from ambient light exposure post mydriasis. Vital signs and pain scales were recorded in infants randomized to either wear or not wear eye patches after mydriasis for their ROP exam. Infants less than 30 weeks gestational age or less than 1500 grams at birth were included. Standard statistical methods were used to compare vital signs and pain scores for each group at baseline, 1 and 3 hours after mydriasis.
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 28 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Crossover Assignment |
| Masking: | None (Open Label) |
| Primary Purpose: | Supportive Care |
| Official Title: | "Eye Protection After Mydriatic Use for ROP Screening: Impact on Vitals Signs and Pain Scores" |
| Study Start Date : | July 2011 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | September 2012 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | September 2012 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Eye patches covers
The infants were randomly assigned by alternating enrolled patients between one of two groups prior to their first ROP screening. Group A was patched for their first ROP exam and then unpatched for their second exam while group B was unpatched for their first ROP exam and patched for their second exam. The patched subjects had eye covers after their eyes were dilated, and the unpatched subjects had comfort measures similar to the patched subjects but their eyes were not covered. The patching of the eyes was done in the same way that it is done for eye protection during phototherapy, with the same model of eye patches (Natus biliband) and with the same nursing care.
|
Behavioral: eye covers
The infants were randomly assigned by alternating enrolled patients between one of two groups prior to their first ROP screening. Group A was patched for their first ROP exam and then unpatched for their second exam while group B was unpatched for their first ROP exam and unpatched for their second exam. The patched subjects had eye covers after their eyes were dilated, and the unpatched subjects had comfort measures similar to the patched subjects but their eyes were not covered. The patching of the eyes was done in the same way that it is done for eye protection during phototherapy, with the same model of eye patches (Natus biliband) and with the same nursing care.
Other Name: eye patches (Natus biliband) |
|
No Intervention: no eye patches covers
The infants were randomly assigned by alternating enrolled patients between one of two groups prior to their first ROP screening. Group A was patched for their first ROP exam and then unpatched for their second exam while group B was unpatched for their first ROP exam and patched for their second exam. The patched subjects had eye covers after their eyes were dilated, and the unpatched subjects had comfort measures similar to the patched subjects but their eyes were not covered. The patching of the eyes was done in the same way that it is done for eye protection during phototherapy, with the same model of eye patches (Natus biliband) and with the same nursing care.
|
- Heart Rate [ Time Frame: pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after mydriatic drops ]At 3 times (pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after Cyclomydril drops), subjects were exposed to ambient lighting for a period of five minutes. This usually entailed removing isolette covers and exposing the patient to the ambient room light. During this time, pain and vital signs were recorded every minute. Heart rate was recorded directly from their cardio-respiratory monitor (Agilent M1106C). The mean of the five recorded values for each variable was used
- Respiratory Rate [ Time Frame: pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after mydriatic drops ]At 3 times (pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after Cyclomydril drops), subjects were exposed to ambient lighting for a period of five minutes. This usually entailed removing isolette covers and exposing the patient to the ambient room light. During this time, pain and vital signs were recorded every minute. Respiratory rate was recorded directly from their cardio-respiratory monitor (Agilent M1106C). The mean of the five recorded values for each variable was used
- Oxygen Percent Saturation [ Time Frame: pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after mydriatic drops ]At 3 times (pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after Cyclomydril drops), subjects were exposed to ambient lighting for a period of five minutes. This usually entailed removing isolette covers and exposing the patient to the ambient room light. During this time, pain and vital signs were recorded every minute. Oxygen percent saturation was recorded directly from their cardio-respiratory monitor (Agilent M1106C). The mean of the five recorded values for each variable was used
- Pain [ Time Frame: pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after mydriatic drops ]At 3 times (pre-mydriasis, 1 hour and 3 hours after Cyclomydril drops), subjects were exposed to ambient lighting for a period of five minutes. This usually entailed removing isolette covers and exposing the patient to the ambient room light. During this time, pain and vital signs were recorded every minute. Pain scores were recorded by direct observation using the Neonatal and Infant Pain Scale (NIPS). The mean of the five recorded values for each variable was used. NIPS scoring consists of 6 measures associated with neonatal or infant pain, each with a range of 0-7 with low scores (0-2) associated with no pain and scores > to 4 associated with severe pain. Maximum scoring would be 42 for severe pain and minimal being 0 for no pain. The six measures on NIPS include: facial expression, crying, breathing patterns, arm movements, leg movements and state of arousal.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | Child, Adult, Older Adult |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- All infants with gestational age at birth of 30 weeks or less or with birth weight less than 1500g undergoing their first ROP exam in the Infant Special Care Unit (ISCU) at UTMB.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Infants were excluded if they had any congenital malformation or syndrome; a history of eye surgery or were receiving inotropics medications.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01860534
| United States, Texas | |
| University of Texas Medical Branch | |
| Galveston, Texas, United States, 77555 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Erika M. Espino-Torres, MD | UTMB |
| Responsible Party: | The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01860534 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
11-039 |
| First Posted: | May 22, 2013 Key Record Dates |
| Results First Posted: | January 14, 2016 |
| Last Update Posted: | January 14, 2016 |
| Last Verified: | May 2014 |
|
pain mydriasis light |
|
Photophobia Vision Disorders Sensation Disorders |
Neurologic Manifestations Nervous System Diseases Eye Diseases |

