Effects and Mechanisms of Specific Trunk Exercises in Low Back Pain
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01611792 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : June 5, 2012
Results First Posted : August 21, 2017
Last Update Posted : October 18, 2017
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Low Back Pain | Other: Stabilization exercise protocol Other: Strength and conditioning exercise protocol | Not Applicable |
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 58 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Masking: | Double (Participant, Investigator) |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | Effects and Mechanisms of Specific Trunk Exercises in Low Back Pain |
| Study Start Date : | March 2003 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | June 2008 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | June 2008 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: Stabilization |
Other: Stabilization exercise protocol
The stabilization exercise protocol consists of exercises focused on improving the ability of trunk muscles to stabilize the spine, beginning with training to isolate the deeper abdominal muscles as well as deep dorsal trunk muscles. Then patients were progressed to exercises that added leverage of the limbs while maintaining the co-contraction of the deeper abdominal muscles and deep dorsal trunk muscles while breathing normally. Various positions (e.g., supine and quadruped positions) were used to challenge the patients based on their tolerance. Finally, patients were progressed to exercises in more functional positions that included tasks/activities that were reported as challenging and/or painful; patients performed the tasks at the speed demanded by the particular task. Maintenance of the co-contraction of deep trunk muscles was emphasized during these functional activities.
Other Names:
|
| Active Comparator: Strengthening and Conditioning |
Other: Strength and conditioning exercise protocol
This protocol contained trunk strengthening and endurance exercises. It consisted of 3 phases: 1) initial strengthening of trunk flexors/extensors in single plane movements, 2) trunk and lower-extremity stretching as well as progression of trunk-strengthening exercises to include multi-planar trunk movements. Aerobic exercises were progressed as tolerated and patient education about body biomechanics were reinforced, and 3) trunk-strengthening exercises under dynamic conditions (e.g., unstable support surface and in multi-planar trunk movements). During the 10 week protocol, exercises became more challenging, and each subject had to complete at least the first phase before moving onto the next phase in order to be included in post-testing analyses. There was no specific focus on the deep abdominal or deep dorsal trunk muscles during any of these exercises.
Other Names:
|
- Change From Baseline to 11 Weeks in Oswestry Disability Scale (0-100%) [ Time Frame: Baseline and 11 weeks ]Disability; Scale 0-100% Lower score is considered better/improved Negative value indicates improvement
- Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Oswestry Disability Scale (0-100%) [ Time Frame: Baseline and 6 Months ]Disability; Sacle 0-100% Lower score is considered better/improved; Negative value indicates improvement
- Change From 11 Weeks to 6 Months in Oswestry Disability Scale (0-100%) [ Time Frame: 11 Weeks and 6 Months ]Disability; Sacle 0-100% Lower score is considered better/improved; Negative value indicates improvement
- Change From Baseline to 11 Weeks in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (0-10 Points) [ Time Frame: Baseline and 11 weeks ]Current Pain Scale 0-10 Lower score is better/improved; Negative value indicates improvement
- Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (0-10 Points) [ Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months ]Current Pain Scale 0-10 Lower score is better/improved; Negative value indicates improvement
- Change From 11 Weeks to 6 Months in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (0-10 Points) [ Time Frame: 11 weeks and 6 months ]Current Pain Scale 0-10 Lower score is better/improved; Negative value indicates improvement
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 21 Years to 55 Years (Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- a history of chronic LBP with or without recurrences for a minimum of 12 months
- between 21 - 55 years of age
- able to stand and walk without assistance
- have an Oswestry Disability Score of 19% or higher
Exclusion Criteria:
- any major structural spinal deformity including scoliosis, kyphosis, or stenosis
- spinal fracture or dislocation
- osteoporosis
- ankylosing spondylitis
- rheumatoid arthritis
- disc herniation with corroborating clinical signs and symptoms
- serious spinal complications such as tumor or infection
- previous spinal surgery
- frank neurological loss, i.e., weakness and sensory loss
- pain or paresthesia below the knee
- etiology of LBP other than the lumbar spine, e.g., hip joint
- history of neurological disease which required hospitalization
- active treatment for cancer
- history of unresolved cancer
- pregnancy or less than 6 months post-partum or less than 6 months post weaning
- magnified symptom-behavior
- worker's compensation or disability case
- in litigation for the LBP problem
- have a BMI ≥ 30
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01611792
| United States, Vermont | |
| Human Motion Analysis Laboratory | |
| Burlington, Vermont, United States, 05405 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Sharon M Henry, PT, PhD | University of Vermont |
| Responsible Party: | Sharon M. Henry, Professor, University of Vermont |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01611792 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
NIH/NCMRR/R01-HD040909 |
| First Posted: | June 5, 2012 Key Record Dates |
| Results First Posted: | August 21, 2017 |
| Last Update Posted: | October 18, 2017 |
| Last Verified: | October 2017 |
| Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
| Plan to Share IPD: | No |
|
Stabilization exercise Strength and conditioning exercise Physical therapy Rehabilitation |
|
Back Pain Low Back Pain Pain Neurologic Manifestations |

