Child Health Improvement Through Computer Automation (CHICA) Highlighting Study
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01583101 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : April 23, 2012
Results First Posted : March 23, 2017
Last Update Posted : May 15, 2017
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
The investigators have developed a novel decision support system for implementing clinical guidelines in pediatric practice. CHICA (Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation) combines three elements: (1) pediatric guidelines encoded in Arden Syntax; (2) a dynamic, scannable paper user interface; and (3) an HL7-compliant interface to existing electronic medical record systems. The result is a system that both delivers "just-in-time" patient-relevant guidelines to physicians during the clinical encounter, and accurately captures structured data from all who interact with it. Preliminary work with CHICA has demonstrated the feasibility of using the system to implement and evaluate clinical guidelines.
However, analyses have shown that physicians ignore a fair number of prompts. The investigators would like to experiment with changes to the system to see if they can increase physicians' response rates. This could include highlighting prompts, reordering them, or flagging them in other ways. The main outcome of interest in the rate at which physicians answer prompts.
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Physician Behavior | Other: Receiving Highlighted Prompts Other: Receiving Non-highlighted Prompts | Not Applicable |
We have developed a novel decision support system for implementing clinical guidelines in pediatric practice. CHICA (Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation) combines three elements: (1) pediatric guidelines encoded in Arden Syntax; (2) a dynamic, scannable paper user interface; and (3) an HL7-compliant interface to existing electronic medical record systems. The result is a system that both delivers "just-in-time" patient-relevant guidelines to physicians during the clinical encounter, and accurately captures structured data from all who interact with it. Preliminary work with CHICA has demonstrated the feasibility of using the system to implement and evaluate clinical guidelines.
However, analyses have shown that physicians ignore a fair number of prompts. We would like to experiment with changes to the system to see if we can increase physicians' response rates. This could include highlighting prompts, reordering them, or flagging them in other ways. The main outcome of interest is the rate at which physicians answer prompts.
This will be a randomized, controlled trial of the CHICA system to see if we can improve prompt response rates. We will randomize physicians or clinics to receive some form of prompt change, including highlighting them, reordering them, or flagging them. No other changes will be made to care.
We will extract data from the CHICA system for all patients seen in our study clinics. This data will include a the clinic location, whether or not a physician responded to a prompt, the prompt's position on the form, the patient's gender, the rule priority of the prompt, rule title, patient insurance category, the patient's age in days, and the name of the provider. The main outcome of interest is whether or not a prompt was answered (discussed/not discussed).
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 2237 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Masking: | Single (Outcomes Assessor) |
| Primary Purpose: | Health Services Research |
| Official Title: | Increasing Prompt Response Rates in the CHICA System |
| Study Start Date : | April 2012 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | October 2012 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | October 2012 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Receiving Highlighted Prompts
Prompts received by physicians were highlighted.
|
Other: Receiving Highlighted Prompts
Prompts received by physicians were highlighted. |
|
Active Comparator: Receiving Non-highlighted Prompts
Prompts received by physicians were not highlighted.
|
Other: Receiving Non-highlighted Prompts
Prompts received by physicians were not highlighted. |
- The Number of Prompts That Were Responded to [ Time Frame: 1 year ]The main outcome of interest is whether or not a prompt was answered (discussed/not discussed).
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | Child, Adult, Older Adult |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Physicians practicing in one of our four CHICA clinics who use CHICA
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not being a physician practicing in one of our four CHICA clinics who use CHICA
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01583101
| United States, Indiana | |
| IUMG Clinic System | |
| Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Aaron E Carroll, MD, MS | Indiana University School of Medicine |
| Responsible Party: | Aaron Carroll, Assoc. Prof of Pediatrics, Indiana University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01583101 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
CHICA_Highlight_Study |
| First Posted: | April 23, 2012 Key Record Dates |
| Results First Posted: | March 23, 2017 |
| Last Update Posted: | May 15, 2017 |
| Last Verified: | April 2017 |
| Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement: | |
| Plan to Share IPD: | No |

