Tap Water Versus Normal Saline for Wound Irrigation
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01564342 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : March 27, 2012
Last Update Posted : March 27, 2012
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- No Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
This study is designed to compare the infection rates in wounds irrigated with sterile normal saline to those irrigated with chlorinated tap water. The hypothesis is that the wound infection rate subsequent to irrigation with tap water is not significantly different than the infection rate for wounds irrigated with sterile normal saline.
Inclusion criteria are patients older than 1-year of age who present to the emergency department with a soft-tissue laceration requiring repair. Exclusion criteria include patients with any underlying immunocompromising illness, current use of antibiotics, puncture or bite wounds, underlying tendon or bone involvement, or wounds more than nine hours old.
Patients are randomized to have their wounds irrigated either with tap water or sterile normal saline prior to closure, controlling for the volume and irrigation method used. Structured follow-up is completed at 48 hours and 30 days to determine the presence of infection.
The primary outcome measure is the difference in wound infection rates between the two randomized groups.
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Wound Infection Rate | Procedure: wound irrigation with study fluid | Not Applicable |
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 660 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Tap Water Irrigation With Normal Saline for Wound Management |
Study Start Date : | June 1994 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | June 1996 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | June 1996 |

Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
wounds irrigated with sterile normal saline
Patients in this arm had their wounds irrigated with sterile normal saline
|
Procedure: wound irrigation with study fluid
wounds were either irrigated with sterile normal saline or tap water. |
wound irrigation with tap water
Patients in the arm had their wounds irrigated with tap water
|
Procedure: wound irrigation with study fluid
wounds were either irrigated with sterile normal saline or tap water. |
- Wound Infection at 48 hours [ Time Frame: 48 hours ]The primary outcome for this study is the difference in wound infection rates between the two randomized groups. It is assessed at 48 hours
- wound infection manifest at 30 days [ Time Frame: 30 days ]patients are again contacted at 30 days after repair of their wound to assess for evidence of delayed or late infections

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 12 Months and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Inclusion Criteria:
• Patients older than 1-year of age, who presented to the ED with an uncomplicated soft-tissue laceration requiring repair.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diabetes mellitus
- Asplenism
- primary immune disorder
- Mechanical heart valve
- Chronic alcoholism
- Steroid use,
- Antibiotics use
- Immunosuppressive chemotherapy
- Wounds older than 9 hours or from a human or animal bite
- Puncture wounds
- Wounds associated with bone, tendon, or neurovascular injury

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01564342
United States, California | |
Stanford University Medical Center | |
Stanford, California, United States, 94305 |
Responsible Party: | Stanford University |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01564342 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
M1272 |
First Posted: | March 27, 2012 Key Record Dates |
Last Update Posted: | March 27, 2012 |
Last Verified: | March 2012 |
wound irrigation tap water irrigation wound infection wound irrigation solution |
Wound Infection Wounds and Injuries Infection |