Treatment Study of Vacuum Assisted Closure for Postsurgical Subcutaneous Abdominal Wound Healing Impairments (SAWHI)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01528033|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : February 7, 2012
Last Update Posted : August 10, 2017
This clinical study is performed in several German, Dutch and Belgian hospitals to evaluate the efficacy of Vacuum Assisted Closure® (V.A.C.®) for the treatment of postsurgical abdominal wound healing impairments after surgery. Therefore the underlying layer of fibrous tissue that permeates the internal organs must be intact.
Main outcome measure is the time until complete wound closure that sustained for a minimum of 14 days. Furthermore the therapy options will be examined regarding several other clinical, safety, patient reported and economic parameters.
Patients will be assigned equally and by chance to both treatment groups. Study participants as well as the attending doctors and nurses will be informed about the assignment to the respective treatment arm.
The primary outcome measure and some of the secondary parameters like reappearance of the wound and the development of the wound size over time, examined within an active study treatment time of 42 days, will be photographed and analysed under the use of a central computer system. The central analysing personal will not be informed about patient details or therapy allocation.
Patients with at first closed belly wounds with wound healing disorder in the postoperative course after surgery without an opening of the underlying layer of fibrous tissue are eligible to be included in the trial if the diagnosis of a wound healing impairment in the postoperative course is manifested as a wound with spontaneous dehiscence, a wound that requires an active reopening of the suture by the treating physician or a wound that cannot be closed by primary intention and requires further treatment to achieve permanent closure.
Study participants will be selected and enrolled within clinical surgical departments which provide the respective personal, structural and scientific background for the conduction of the trial project.
Trial therapy will be started in-hospital and may be continued in ambulatory care. It is very important to examine the therapy options also in the ambulant care setting thus study participants with good health who are able to continue the specific wound treatment in ambulant should be transferred to the ambulant service as soon as possible.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Wound Healing Disorder Impaired Wound Healing Abdominal Wound Healing Disorder Abdominal Wound Healing Impairment Acute Postsurgical Subcutaneous Wound||Device: Vacuum Assisted Closure® Other: Standard conventional wound therapy||Not Applicable|
Hide Detailed Description
The Institute for Research in Operative Medicine as part of the Private University of Witten /Herdecke is planning and performing a clinical trial project to evaluate the efficacy of Vacuum Assisted Closure® (V.A.C.®) Therapy for the treatment of postsurgical abdominal wound healing impairments after surgery without fascial dehiscence. The clinical trial project is fully financed by Kinetic Concepts Incorporated (KCI). The V.A.C.® Therapy devices that will be used in this study include the ActiV.A.C.® Therapy System, InfoV.A.C.® Therapy System, and V.A.C. Freedom® Therapy System. All V.A.C.® Therapy devices to be utilized in this study bear the CE mark and will be operated within normal conditions of use and according to manufacturer's specifications.
Background of the clinical trial project is the decision of the Joint Federal Committee of Germany (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschusses (G-BA)) that Vacuum assisted closure therapy is inadmissible to be a standard benefit of health insurance companies in Germany.
This decision is based on systematic review & meta-analysis of existing trials performed by Institute for Quality and Economic Efficiency in the Healthcare System (Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG)) which showed an insufficient state of evidence regarding the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of acute and chronic wounds.
This study project compares Vacuum Assisted Closure® and standard conventional wound therapy in the treatment of acute abdominal wounds after surgery without fascial dehiscence and will be conducted in abdominal surgical hospital departments with the required structural, manpower, and scientific qualifications. Patients will be stratified according to hospital and wound size. Trial therapy will be started in-hospital and may be continued in ambulatory care.
The study is designed as a multinational, multicentre, prospective randomized controlled, adaptive design, clinical superiority trial, with blinded photographic analysis of the primary endpoint.
The primary objective is to compare the clinical, safety, and economic outcomes of V.A.C.® Therapy and SCWT in postsurgical abdominal wound healing impairments without fascial dehiscence.
The primary outcome to be observed in this study is time to complete abdominal wound closure where closure is observed at or before day 42 and is confirmed to have been sustained for a period of at least 14 consecutive days. This study design also will allow detailed description of specific covariates to determine their effect on response variables (healing).
This study's hypothesis is that the use of the V.A.C.® Therapy System, when compared to SCWT in the management of post-surgical abdominal wound healing impairments with intact fascia, will result in a decrease in the time to achieve complete wound closure with confirmation after subsequent 14 days.
Using V.A.C.® Therapy is an effective and safe treatment option for hospitals as well as for outpatient care for treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds with wound healing impairment in the postoperative course.
Randomisation to treatment arms will be performed at a 1:1 ratio. Randomisation will be performed via a centralized system with an Internet-based tool. To address issues of blinding, wound photo documentation will be obtained during the trial and confirmation of wound closure will be assessed via blinded photographic analysis, which will serve as the method of primary endpoint analysis.
Primary closed abdominal wounds with wound healing disorder in the postoperative course after surgical intervention without fascial dehiscence are eligible to be included in the trial if the diagnosis of a wound healing impairment in the postoperative course is manifested as a wound with spontaneous dehiscence, a wound that requires an active reopening of the suture by the treating physician or a wound that cannot be closed by primary intention and requires further treatment to achieve permanent closure.
During active recruitment phase, the pre-trial estimates indicate approximately 600 patients will be required to yield the target of 552 evaluable participants. Using an adaptive design study sample-size calculations will be re-estimated upon planed interim analysis of study data of 250 patients. Patients will be enrolled from approximately 25 centres in Germany, the United Kingdom, Belgium and the Netherlands.
The evaluation of the primary Endpoint defined as time (number of days) to achieve complete wound closure verified by photo documentation and blinded, computer-based wound quality assessment as well as wound closure confirmation after 14 consecutive days and secondary endpoints including clinical endpoints like recurrences, safety endpoints, patient reported outcome parameters and economic-based outcome measures will provide data regarding efficacy and efficiency of NPWT therapy for the treatment of acute post-surgical abdominal wound healing impairment in hospital as well as in the ambulant setting.
The results of the study will be provided to make a contribution to the final decision of the Joint Federal Committee about NPWT to be a standard benefit of health insurance companies in Germany for inpatient and / or outpatient care.
|Study Type :||Interventional (Clinical Trial)|
|Estimated Enrollment :||550 participants|
|Intervention Model:||Parallel Assignment|
|Masking:||Single (Outcomes Assessor)|
|Official Title:||Treatment of Subcutaneous Abdominal Wound Healing Impairment After Surgery Without Fascial Dehiscence by Vacuum Assisted Closure™(SAWHI-V.A.C.® Study) Versus Standard Conventional Wound Therapy|
|Study Start Date :||August 2011|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date :||December 2017|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||June 2018|
Experimental: Vacuum Assisted Closure®
Negative pressure wound therapy
Device: Vacuum Assisted Closure®
Vacuum Assisted Closure® (V.A.C.®) Therapy within a maximum study treatment time of 42 days.
VAC® Therapy Systems used within the trial are ActiV.A.C.®, InfoV.A.C.®, V.A.C. Freedom®, V.A.C. Via® and VAC Ulta®. All used systems are equally eligible for the treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds and should be used according to availability and local preferences within the trial site.
Systems differ regarding user surface and display and processing of data. For the treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds the V.A.C.® Granufoam Dressing (size medium and big) is recommended.
Other Name: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Active Comparator: Standard conventional wound therapy
According to institutional clinical standards
Other: Standard conventional wound therapy
Standard conventional wound therapy (SCWT) according to institutional clinical standards within a maximum study treatment time of 42 days
- Time to complete wound closure [ Time Frame: 42 days ]
Time (number of days) to achieve complete wound closure verified by photo documentation and blinded, computer-based wound quality assessment as well as wound closure confirmation after 14 consecutive days (14 days -0 / + 3)
Complete wound closure is defined as:
100% epithelialization No drainage from the wound No need for adjuvant therapy or dressing No presence of sutures
- Incidence of confirmed and verified wound closure [ Time Frame: 42 days ]Incidence of confirmed and verified wound closure achieved after a maximum study observation / treatment period of 42 days (+ 14 days to observe sustained closure)
- Recurrence [ Time Frame: 132 days ]Recurrence of wound opening after confirmed wound closure
- Wound size over time [ Time Frame: 42 days ]Reduction of wound size over time (Reduction in wound volume over time + Reduction in wound surface area over time)
- Serious Adverse Events (SAE) [ Time Frame: 132 days ]Incidence of serious adverse events
- Adverse Events [ Time Frame: 42 days ]Incidence of wound-related adverse events and adverse device events
- Mortality [ Time Frame: 132 days ]Mortality of any cause (within 132 days from the time of initiation of therapy)
- Quality of Life (QoL) [ Time Frame: 132 days ]SF-36® at Visit Wound Closure or End of Maximum Treatment Time, Visit Hospital Discharge if applicable and Visit general Follow Up at Day 132
- Pain [ Time Frame: 42 days ]Pain (using a patient diary form Day 1 to Day 42 or until wound closure)
- Patient Satisfaction [ Time Frame: 132 days ]Patient Satisfaction (Visit general Follow Up at Day 132)
- Direct medical resource use [ Time Frame: 42 days ]diagnostics, medication, specific wound therapy, treatment and medical attendance, reinterventions, rehospitalisations
- Indirect medical resource use [ Time Frame: 42 days ]restrictions of productivity besides absence from the workplace (activities of daily living); non-productive time for gainfully employed
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01528033
|Contact: Doerthe Seidel||0049(0)2219895726||Doerthe.Seidel@uni-wh.de|
|Contact: Stefan Bauer||0049(0) 221989 5735||Stefan.Bauer@uni-wh.de|
|Brussel, Belgium, 1090|
|Contact: Mathias Allaeys email@example.com|
|Department of Abdominal Surgery Gasthuisberg University Hospital||Recruiting|
|Leuven, Belgium, 3000|
|Contact: Marc Miserez, Prof. firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg (Berlin)||Recruiting|
|Berlin, Germany, 10365|
|Contact: F. Fritze- Büttner, Dr. 0049 30 5518-4471 email@example.com|
|Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie||Recruiting|
|Berlin, Germany, 12683|
|Contact: Henryk Thielemann, Dr. +49/30/5681-0 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|St. Josef-Hospital gGmbH Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum||Recruiting|
|Bochum, Germany, 44791|
|Contact: Waldemar Uhl, Prof. Dr. email@example.com|
|Göttingen, Germany, 37075|
|Contact: Recca Talaulicar +49 (551) 398706 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Klinik für Allgemeine Chirurgie, Viszeral-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie||Recruiting|
|Homburg, Germany, 66421|
|Contact: Matthias Glanemann, Prof. Dr. +49 / 6841/16-31000 email@example.com|
|UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität||Recruiting|
|Mainz, Germany, 55131|
|Contact: Grimminger, Dr. firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Universitätsmedizin Mannheim Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg Chirurgische Klinik||Recruiting|
|Mannheim, Germany, 68167|
|Contact: Florian Herrle, Dr. Florian.email@example.com|
|Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar||Recruiting|
|München, Germany, 81675|
|Contact: André Mihaljevic, Dr. med. +49 (89) 41402121 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Ruppiner Kliniken GmbH||Recruiting|
|Neuruppin, Germany, 16816|
|Contact: Stephan Gretschel, PD Dr. email@example.com|
|Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Klinik für Allgemein- und Visceralchirurgie||Recruiting|
|Potsdam, Germany, 14467|
|Contact: Frank Marusch, Prof. Dr. +49 (331) 2415202 firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Rotenburg, Germany, 27356|
|Contact: Oleg Heizmann, PD Dr. O.Heizmann@diako-online.de|
|Thüringen-Kliniken "Georgius Agricola" GmbH||Recruiting|
|Saalfeld, Germany, 07318|
|Contact: Thomas Krönert, Dr. email@example.com|
|GRN-Klinik Sinsheim, Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie||Recruiting|
|Sinsheim, Germany, 74889|
|Contact: Tobias Gehrig, Dr. firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Principal Investigator:||Doerthe Seidel||Institut für Forschung in der Operativen Medizin der Privaten Universität Witten / Herdecke gGmbH|