Effect of High Dose Ciclesonide on Asthma Control (CONTRAST)
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01455194 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : October 19, 2011
Results First Posted : October 25, 2016
Last Update Posted : February 10, 2017
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Bronchial Asthma | Drug: Ciclesonide | Phase 3 |
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 520 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Masking: | Double (Participant, Investigator) |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | Control of Moderate or Severe Asthma With 160, 320 and 640 mcg Ciclesonide/Day. A One-year Randomised, Double-blind, Multicenter Trial. |
| Study Start Date : | November 2011 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | August 2014 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | August 2014 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: CIC 160
Two puffs of 40 mcg ciclesonide inhaled in the morning and the evening (corresponding to a total daily dose of 160 mcg)
|
Drug: Ciclesonide
During the treatment period subjects will inhale two puffs of either 40, 80 or 160 μg ciclesonide in the morning and the evening (corresponding to a total daily dose of 160, 320 or 640 μg) |
|
Active Comparator: CIC 320
Two puffs of 80 mcg ciclesonide inhaled in the morning and the evening (corresponding to a total daily dose of 320 mcg)
|
Drug: Ciclesonide
During the treatment period subjects will inhale two puffs of either 40, 80 or 160 μg ciclesonide in the morning and the evening (corresponding to a total daily dose of 160, 320 or 640 μg) |
|
Active Comparator: CIC 640
Two puffs of 160 mcg ciclesonide inhaled in the morning and the evening (corresponding to a total daily dose of 640 mcg)
|
Drug: Ciclesonide
During the treatment period subjects will inhale two puffs of either 40, 80 or 160 μg ciclesonide in the morning and the evening (corresponding to a total daily dose of 160, 320 or 640 μg) |
- Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Score at Baseline [ Time Frame: Baseline ]The ACQ was developed to measure the adequacy of asthma control in clinical research and in clinical practice. It includes 5 questions about symptoms, 1 question about beta 2 -agonist use and 1 about lung function (FEV1% predicted). Participants recall their experiences during the previous 7 days and respond to each question using a 7-point scale. The items are equally weighted and the ACQ score is the mean of 7 items and ranges between 0 (well controlled) and 6 (extremely poorly controlled). Mean scores of =<0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.76 and < 1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and a score >= 1.5 indicates uncontrolled asthma.
- Change From Baseline in ACQ Score to Tlast [ Time Frame: Week 52 ]The ACQ was developed to measure the adequacy of asthma control in clinical research and in clinical practice. It includes 5 questions about symptoms, 1 question about beta 2 -agonist use and 1 about lung function (FEV1% predicted). Participants recall their experiences during the previous 7 days and respond to each question using a 7-point scale. The items are equally weighted and the ACQ score is the mean of 7 items and ranges between 0 (well controlled) and 6 (extremely poorly controlled). Mean scores of =<0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.76 and < 1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and a score >= 1.5 indicates uncontrolled asthma.
- Time Course of ACQ [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (Treatment period) ]The time course of the incidence of a 0.5 points improvement of ACQ score was evaluated. Mean ACQ values over time by treatment group for on-treatment site measurements was assessed. The time course of asthma control (ACQ) was done on a weekly base using home-based and site-based ACQ measurements. The ACQ was developed to measure the adequacy of asthma control in clinical research and in clinical practice. It includes 5 questions about symptoms, 1 question about beta 2 -agonist use and 1 about lung function (FEV1% predicted). Participants recall their experiences during the previous 7 days and respond to each question using a 7-point scale. The items are equally weighted and the ACQ score is the mean of 7 items and ranges between 0 (well controlled) and 6 (extremely poorly controlled). Mean scores of =<0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.76 and < 1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and a score >= 1.5 indicates uncontrolled asthma.
- Number of Weeks With Well-controlled Asthma Over the Course of the Study [ Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 52 (treatment period) ]The number of weeks with well-controlled asthma is defined as the number of weeks that the participant had an ACQ score of 0.75 or lower over the course of the study. The ACQ was developed to measure the adequacy of asthma control in clinical research and in clinical practice. It includes 5 questions about symptoms, 1 question about beta 2 -agonist use and 1 about lung function (FEV1% predicted). Participants recall their experiences during the previous 7 days and respond to each question using a 7-point scale. The items are equally weighted and the ACQ score is the mean of 7 items and ranges between 0 (well controlled) and 6 (extremely poorly controlled). Mean scores of =<0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.76 and < 1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and a score >= 1.5 indicates uncontrolled asthma.
- Number of Participants With Well-controlled Asthma and ACQ Improvement at the End of the Study [ Time Frame: Week 52 ]Well-controlled asthma at the end of the study was defined as a participant with an ACQ score of 0.75 or lower. ACQ improvement was defined as a decrease in ACQ score of at least 0.5. The ACQ was developed to measure the adequacy of asthma control in clinical research and in clinical practice. It includes 5 questions about symptoms, 1 question about beta 2 -agonist use and 1 about lung function (FEV1% predicted). Participants recall their experiences during the previous 7 days and respond to each question using a 7-point scale. The items are equally weighted and the ACQ score is the mean of 7 items and ranges between 0 (well controlled) and 6 (extremely poorly controlled). Mean scores of =<0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.76 and < 1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and a score >= 1.5 indicates uncontrolled asthma.
- Number of Participants Reporting Time to First Well-Controlled Asthma and ACQ Improvement [ Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 52 (treatment period) ]Well-controlled asthma at the end of the study was defined as a participant with an ACQ score of 0.75 or lower. ACQ improvement was defined as a decrease in ACQ score of at least 0.5. The ACQ was developed to measure the adequacy of asthma control in clinical research and in clinical practice. It includes 5 questions about symptoms, 1 question about beta 2 -agonist use and 1 about lung function (FEV1% predicted). Participants recall their experiences during the previous 7 days and respond to each question using a 7-point scale. The items are equally weighted and the ACQ score is the mean of 7 items and ranges between 0 (well controlled) and 6 (extremely poorly controlled). Mean scores of =<0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.76 and < 1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and a score >= 1.5 indicates uncontrolled asthma.
- Number of Participants Reporting Time to First Well-Controlled Asthma Measurement by ACQ Cut-Off Point [ Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 52 (treatment period) ]Well-controlled asthma was defined as an ACQ score of equal to or lower than the ACQ cut-off point.The ACQ was developed to measure the adequacy of asthma control in clinical research and in clinical practice. It includes 5 questions about symptoms, 1 question about beta 2 -agonist use and 1 about lung function (FEV1% predicted). Participants recall their experiences during the previous 7 days and respond to each question using a 7-point scale. The items are equally weighted and the ACQ score is the mean of 7 items and ranges between 0 (well controlled) and 6 (extremely poorly controlled). Mean scores of =<0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.76 and < 1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and a score >= 1.5 indicates uncontrolled asthma.
- Number of Participants Reporting Time to First Asthma Exacerbation [ Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 52 (treatment period) ]Asthma exacerbations were defined as a worsening of asthma requiring either treatment with oral (or other systemic) glucocorticosteroids for at least 3 days or hospitalisation or a visit to the emergency room because of asthma. Baseline was defined as the average of the ACQ measurements of the last 2 weeks at site prior to first intake of double-blind study medication
- Number of Participants Reporting Asthma Exacerbations Rates [ Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 52 (treatment period) ]Participants with at least 1 asthma exacerbation in the double-blind treatment period have been reported. As predefined in the protocol, the results for participants with missing data for any category were not included.
- Number of Participants With Markedly High Benefits [ Time Frame: Week 1 up to Week 52 ]The analyses was intended to identify participant's subsets that would benefit from dose escalation. This analysis tested the potential factors, including age, sex, pretrial inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose category, history of exacerbations, baseline ACQ score, baseline BMI category and smoking status. ACQ includes 5 questions about symptoms, 1 about beta 2 -agonist use and 1 about lung function (FEV1% predicted). Participants recall their experiences during the previous 7 days and respond to each question using a 7-point scale. The items are equally weighted and the ACQ score is the mean of 7 items and ranges between 0 (well controlled) and 6 (extremely poorly controlled).Mean scores of =<0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.76 and < 1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and a score >=1.5 indicates uncontrolled asthma. As predefined in the protocol, participants with missing data for any category were not included.
- Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) [ Time Frame: Baseline period (Week -3 up to -1), treatment period (Baseline up to Week 56) ]An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. TEAE is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. AEs included both serious AEs and non-serious AEs. Baseline of double-blind treatment period was defined as the average of the measurements of the last 2 weeks at site prior to first intake of double-blind study medication.
- Number of Participants Reporting Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs [ Time Frame: Baseline period (Week -3 up to -1), treatment period (Baseline up to Week 56) ]Vital signs included body temperature, blood pressure (BP) and pulse rate. Normal range for vital signs included: Systolic BP >170 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) or <85 mm Hg, Diastolic BP >105 mm Hg, resting pulse rate: >120 bpm or <50 bpm, difference in systolic BP at Visit x (increase or decrease) compared with pretreatment >40 mm Hg and difference in pulse rate at Visit x (increase or decrease) compared with pretreatment >30 bpm. Baseline of double-blind treatment period was defined as the average of the measurements of the last 2 weeks at site prior to first intake of double-blind study medication.
- Number of Participants Reporting Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Physical Examination Findings [ Time Frame: Baseline period (Week -3 up to -1), treatment period (Baseline up to Week 56) ]Physical examination consists of examinations of the following body systems: (1) eyes; (2) ears, nose, throat; (3) cardiovascular system; (4) respiratory system; (5) gastrointestinal system; (6) dermatologic system; (7) extremities; (8) musculoskeletal system; (9) nervous system; (10) lymph nodes; and (11) physical examinations other than body systems described in (1) to (10). Baseline of double-blind treatment period was defined as the average of the measurements of the last 2 weeks at site prior to first intake of double-blind study medication.
- Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values [ Time Frame: Baseline period (Week -3 up to -1), treatment period (Baseline up to Week 56) ]The number of participants with any markedly abnormal standard safety laboratory values collected throughout study. Baseline of double-blind treatment period was defined as the average of the measurements of the last 2 weeks at site prior to first intake of double-blind study medication.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 12 Years to 70 Years (Child, Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Written informed consent was provided
- History of persistent bronchial asthma for at least 6 months
- Current treatment with an Inhaled Corticosteroid (ICS) at a stable dose in the dose range of 200-1000 μg Fluticasone Propionate (FP)/day or equivalent for a minimum of 12 weeks
- Good inhalation technique
- Under the current ICS pre-treatment the ACQ score ranges between ≥ 0.75 and ≥ 2
Exclusion Criteria:
- Clinically relevant abnormal laboratory values suggesting an unknown disease and requiring further clinical evaluation
- Concomitant severe diseases (e.g. malignant diseases during the past 5 years [other than basal or squamous cell carcinoma], hepatitis C, acquired immune deficiency syndrome [AIDS])
- Diseases which are contraindications for the use of ICS (e.g. active or inactive pulmonary tuberculosis or relevant fungal, bacterial or viral infections of the lower respiratory tract demanding specific treatment)
- Use of systemic glucocorticosteroids within 4 weeks (injectable depot steroids 6 weeks) before entry into the baseline period, or more than 3 times during the last 6 months
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01455194
| Argentina | |
| Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, Argentina | |
| Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina | |
| Rosario-Santa Fe, Argentina | |
| Rosario, Argentina | |
| Salta, Argentina | |
| Tucuman, Argentina | |
| Brazil | |
| Florianopolis, Brazil | |
| Goiania, Brazil | |
| Porto Alegre, Brazil | |
| Rio de Janiero, Brazil | |
| Santo Andre, Sao Paulo, Brazil | |
| Sao Paulo, Brazil | |
| Sorocaba, Brazil | |
| Germany | |
| Berlin, Germany | |
| Bonn, Germany | |
| Landsberg, Germany | |
| Rudersdorf, Germany | |
| Schwetzingen, Germany | |
| Israel | |
| Beer-Sheva, Israel | |
| Haifa, Israel | |
| Jerusalem, Israel | |
| Kfar Saba, Israel | |
| Petach Tikva, Israel | |
| Rehovot, Israel | |
| Tel Aviv, Israel | |
| Russian Federation | |
| Barnaul, Russian Federation | |
| Moscow, Russian Federation | |
| Novosibirsk, Russian Federation | |
| St. Petersburg, Russian Federation | |
| Tomsk, Russian Federation | |
| Study Director: | AstraZeneca AstraZeneca | AstraZeneca |
| Responsible Party: | AstraZeneca |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01455194 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
CL-9709-301-RD 2011-000683-99 ( EudraCT Number ) U1111-1133-6333 ( Registry Identifier: WHO ) CL-9709-301-RDCTID ( Registry Identifier: Israel ) |
| First Posted: | October 19, 2011 Key Record Dates |
| Results First Posted: | October 25, 2016 |
| Last Update Posted: | February 10, 2017 |
| Last Verified: | December 2016 |
|
ciclesonide asthma |
|
Asthma Bronchial Diseases Respiratory Tract Diseases Lung Diseases, Obstructive Lung Diseases Respiratory Hypersensitivity Hypersensitivity, Immediate Hypersensitivity |
Immune System Diseases Ciclesonide Glucocorticoids Hormones Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists Physiological Effects of Drugs Anti-Allergic Agents |

