Try the modernized ClinicalTrials.gov beta website. Learn more about the modernization effort.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Safety and Efficacy of Two Types of Botulinum Toxin Type A For the Treatment of Glabellar Lines

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01271452
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : January 6, 2011
Results First Posted : January 16, 2012
Last Update Posted : January 29, 2019
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Allergan

Study Description
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information
Brief Summary:
This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of two different types of botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of glabellar frown lines.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Glabellar Lines Biological: botulinum toxin type A Phase 4

Study Design
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Layout table for study information
Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 224 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Study Start Date : September 2010
Actual Primary Completion Date : January 2011
Actual Study Completion Date : April 2011

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Botox

Arms and Interventions
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Arm Intervention/treatment
Active Comparator: Vistabel®
botulinum toxin type A (Vistabel®)
 Biological: botulinum toxin type A
20 units (total dose) botulinum toxin type A injected into glabellar region on Day 0
Other Names:
  • Vistabel®
  • BOTOX® Cosmetic
Active Comparator: Bocouture®
botulinum toxin type A (Bocouture®)
 Biological: botulinum toxin type A
30 units (total dose) botulinum toxin type A injected into glabellar region on Day 0
Other Name: Bocouture®


Outcome Measures
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Number of Subjects With a Treatment Response at Day 28 Based on the Injector's Assessment of the Severity of Glabellar Lines at Maximum Contraction Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) [ Time Frame: Day 28 ]
    Number of subjects with a treatment response at Day 28 based on the injector's assessment of the severity of glabellar lines at maximum contraction using the FWS. The FWS measures wrinkles on a scale from 0=none (best) to 3=severe (worst). Treatment response was defined as a 1 point or greater reduction from Day 0 in the FWS score at maximum contraction.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Number of Subjects With a Treatment Response at Day 84 Based on the Injector's Assessment of the Severity of Glabellar Lines at Maximum Contraction Using the FWS [ Time Frame: Day 84 ]
    Number of subjects with a treatment response at Day 84 based on the injector's assessment of the severity of glabellar lines at maximum contraction using the FWS. The FWS measures wrinkles on a scale from 0=none (best) to 3=severe (worst). Treatment response was defined as a 1 point or greater reduction from Day 0 in the FWS score at maximum contraction.

  2. Number of Subjects With a Treatment Response at Day 98 Based on the Injector's Assessment of the Severity of Glabellar Lines at Maximum Contraction Using the FWS [ Time Frame: Day 98 ]
    Number of subjects with a treatment response at Day 98 based on the injector's assessment of the severity of glabellar lines at maximum contraction using the FWS. The FWS measures wrinkles on a scale from 0=none (best) to 3=severe (worst). Treatment response was defined as a 1 point or greater reduction from Day 0 in the FWS score at maximum contraction.

  3. Number of Subjects With a Treatment Response at Day 112 Based on the Injector's Assessment of the Severity of Glabellar Lines at Maximum Contraction Using the FWS [ Time Frame: Day 112 ]
    Number of subjects with a treatment response at Day 112 based on the injector's assessment of the severity of glabellar lines at maximum contraction using the FWS. The FWS measures wrinkles on a scale from 0=none (best) to 3=severe (worst). Treatment response was defined as a 1 point or greater reduction from Day 0 in the FWS score at maximum contraction.

  4. Number of Subjects With a Treatment Response at Day 28 Based on the Subject's Assessment of the Severity of Glabellar Lines at Maximum Contraction Using the FWS [ Time Frame: Day 28 ]
    Number of subjects with a treatment response at Day 28 based on the subject's assessment of the severity of glabellar lines at maximum contraction using the FWS. The FWS measures wrinkles on a scale from 0=none (best) to 3=severe (worst). Treatment response was defined as a 1 point or greater reduction from Day 0 in the FWS score at maximum contraction.

  5. Number of Subjects With a Treatment Response at Day 84 Based on the Subject's Assessment of the Severity of Glabellar Lines at Maximum Contraction Using the FWS [ Time Frame: Day 84 ]
    Number of subjects with a treatment response at Day 84 based on the subject's assessment of the severity of glabellar lines at maximum contraction using the FWS. The FWS measures wrinkles on a scale from 0=none (best) to 3=severe (worst). Treatment response was defined as a 1 point or greater reduction from Day 0 in the FWS score at maximum contraction.

  6. Number of Subjects With a Treatment Response at Day 98 Based on the Subject's Assessment of the Severity of Glabellar Lines at Maximum Contraction Using the FWS [ Time Frame: Day 98 ]
    Number of subjects with a treatment response at Day 98 based on the subject's assessment of the severity of glabellar lines at maximum contraction using the FWS. The FWS measures wrinkles on a scale from 0=none (best) to 3=severe (worst). Treatment response was defined as a 1 point or greater reduction from Day 0 in the FWS score at maximum contraction.

  7. Number of Subjects With a Treatment Response at Day 112 Based on the Subject's Assessment of the Severity of Glabellar Lines at Maximum Contraction Using the FWS [ Time Frame: Day 112 ]
    Number of subjects with a treatment response at Day 112 based on the subject's assessment of the severity of glabellar lines at maximum contraction using the FWS. The FWS measures wrinkles on a scale from 0=none (best) to 3=severe (worst). Treatment response was defined as a 1 point or greater reduction from Day 0 in the FWS score at maximum contraction.


Eligibility Criteria
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Layout table for eligibility information
Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 65 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Moderate to severe glabellar frown lines

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of myasthenia gravis or Eaton Lambert syndrome
  • Aesthetic treatment with botulinum toxin within 6 months or planned treatment with botulinum toxin for any reason during the study
  • Prior filler treatments, surgeries, insertion procedures in/to the glabellar region
  • Facial cosmetic procedures in the glabellar area within 6 months
  • Bleeding disorders or use of anticoagulants within 10 days
  • History of facial nerve palsy
Contacts and Locations
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01271452


Locations
Layout table for location information
Germany
Munich, Bavaria, Germany
Sponsors and Collaborators
Allergan
Investigators
Layout table for investigator information
Study Director: Medical Director Allergan
More Information
Go to 
Top of Page Study Description Study Design Arms and Interventions Outcome Measures Eligibility Criteria Contacts and Locations More Information
Publications:

Layout table for additonal information
Responsible Party: Allergan
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01271452    
Other Study ID Numbers: MAF/AGN/Facial/011
2010-021401-20 ( EudraCT Number )
First Posted: January 6, 2011    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: January 16, 2012
Last Update Posted: January 29, 2019
Last Verified: January 2019
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Layout table for MeSH terms
Botulinum Toxins
Botulinum Toxins, Type A
abobotulinumtoxinA
Acetylcholine Release Inhibitors
Membrane Transport Modulators
Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
 Cholinergic Agents
Neurotransmitter Agents
Physiological Effects of Drugs
Neuromuscular Agents
Peripheral Nervous System Agents