Polidocanol Endovenous Microfoam (PEM) Versus Vehicle for the Treatment of Saphenofemoral Junction (SFJ) Incompetence (VANISH-2)
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01231373 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : November 1, 2010
Results First Posted : April 2, 2014
Last Update Posted : April 21, 2021
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Varicose Veins | Drug: polidocanol injectable foam, 0.125% Drug: polidocanol injectable foam, 0.5% Drug: polidocanol injectable foam, 1.0% Drug: Vehicle | Phase 3 |
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 235 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Masking: | Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor) |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Randomized, Blinded, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Varisolve Polidocanol Endovenous Microfoam (PEM) 0.5% and 1% Compared to Vehicle for the Treatment on Saphenofemoral Junction (SFJ) Incompetence "VANISH-2" |
| Study Start Date : | November 2010 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | September 2011 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | August 2014 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: polidocanol injectable foam, 0.125% |
Drug: polidocanol injectable foam, 0.125%
active placebo for blinding |
| Experimental: polidocanol injectable foam, 0.5% |
Drug: polidocanol injectable foam, 0.5%
0.5% polidocanol foam injection |
| Experimental: polidocanol injectable foam, 1.0% |
Drug: polidocanol injectable foam, 1.0%
1.0% polidocanol foam injection |
| Placebo Comparator: Vehicle |
Drug: Vehicle
injection of vehicle comparator |
- Change in Patient-Reported Symptoms of Varicose Veins (VVSymQ Score) [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ]The 9 varicose vein symptoms were to be assessed and graded on a 6-point (i.e., 0-5) duration scale and an 11-point (i.e., 0-10) intensity scale, and the patient's level activity for that day was to be assessed and graded on the 6-point (i.e., 0-5) duration scale. The 9 varicose vein symptoms assessed using the e-diary were derived from the first question of the modified Venous Insufficiency Epidemiologic and Economic Study-Quality of Life/Symptoms (VEINES-QOL/Sym) instrument. The VVSymQ is a subset of 5 VEINES QOL/Sym items that have been determined in earlier studies to be most important to patients. The daily VVSymQ score is the sum of the duration scores for these 5 symptoms (scores range from 0 to 25). At Visit 2/baseline, Week 8, scores were calculated.
- Change From Baseline to 8 Weeks in Appearance as Rated by Patient (PA-V3) [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ]The Patient Self-assessment of Visible Varicose Veins (PA-V3) instrument is a 5-point scale used by patients to evaluate the appearance of their visible varicose veins. On this single-item paper questionnaire, the instructions included a diagram fo the medial view of a leg with the area between the ankle and the groin circled. The patient was instructed to choose 1 of 5 response options that best described the appearance of the visible varicose veins of the leg that was treated in the study. The patient was instructed not to consider the appearance of the leg outside the circled area or of any spider veins. Possible responses ranged from "Not at all noticeable" (a score of 0) to "Extremely noticeable" (a score of 4).
- Change From Baseline at 8 Weeks Post-Treatment in IPR-V3 Score--Physician Photographic Review of Appearance [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ]The Independent Photography Review--Visible Varicose Veins (IPR-V3) instrument is a 5-point scale used to assess the appearance of a patient's visible varicose veins. At baseline and Week 8, standardized digital photographs were taken of the medial view of the patient's target leg, from groin to ankle. An independent photography review panel, consisting of 3 trained, blinded clinicians, evaluated the appearance of the patient's visible varicose veins using the IPR-V3 instrument's 5-point scale (0-4, where 0=none and 4=very severe visible varicose veins).
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Incompetence of SFJ associated with incompetence of the GSV or other major accessory vein
- Ability to comprehend and sign an informed consent document and complete study questionnaires in English
- Ability to record symptoms in accordance with the protocol
- Symptomatic varicose veins
- Visible varicose veins
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who only have telangiectatic or reticular veins (Clinical Finding C1, as assessed by CEAP Classification of Venous Disorders).
- Leg obesity impairing the ability to access the vein to be treated and/or to apply post-procedure compression bandaging and stockings
- Ultrasonographic or other evidence of current or previous deep vein thrombosis or occlusion
- Deep vein reflux unless clinically insignificant in comparison to superficial reflux
- Peripheral arterial disease precluding the wearing of post-procedure compression bandaging and stockings
- Reduced mobility
- Major surgery, prolonged hospitalization or pregnancy within 3 months of screening
- Major co-existing disease (e.g. malignancy; pulmonary disease; renal or hepatic insufficiency; serious skin disease/condition that may compromise the ability of the patient to comply with the compression protocol, etc.)
- Known allergic response to polidocanol or heparin, including history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and/or multiple allergic reactions
- Current alcohol or drug abuse
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Women of childbearing potential not using effective contraception
- History of DVT, pulmonary embolism, or stroke
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01231373
| United States, Alabama | |
| Dothan, Alabama, United States, 36303 | |
| United States, California | |
| San Diego, California, United States, 92120 | |
| San Diego, California, United States, 92121 | |
| United States, Indiana | |
| Lafayette, Indiana, United States, 47905 | |
| United States, Maryland | |
| Frederick, Maryland, United States, 21701 | |
| Hunt Valley, Maryland, United States, 21030 | |
| United States, New Mexico | |
| Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States, 87544 | |
| United States, Oklahoma | |
| Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104 | |
| United States, Pennsylvania | |
| Monroeville, Pennsylvania, United States, 15143 | |
| Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15232 | |
| United States, South Carolina | |
| Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29615 | |
| United States, Washington | |
| Bellevue, Washington, United States, 98004 | |
| Responsible Party: | Boston Scientific Corporation |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01231373 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
VAP.VV016 |
| First Posted: | November 1, 2010 Key Record Dates |
| Results First Posted: | April 2, 2014 |
| Last Update Posted: | April 21, 2021 |
| Last Verified: | April 2021 |
|
varicose veins |
|
Varicose Veins Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases |
Polidocanol Sclerosing Solutions Pharmaceutical Solutions |

