A Comparison of Metallic Staples Versus Absorbable Staples After a Cesarean Section (C-Section)
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01198691 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : September 10, 2010
Results First Posted : June 12, 2014
Last Update Posted : October 9, 2018
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Cesarean Section | Device: Insorb absorbable staples Device: Insorb | Phase 2 |
The ideal method of closing the skin following a Pfannenstiel incision has not yet been established. Presently, the method of skin closure is a matter of the surgeon's personal preference. Currently, there is limited evidence regarding which method is considered "superior" in terms of post operative pain, patient satisfaction, and cost effectiveness. This information would be incredibly valuable in helping guide surgeons in their choice of skin closure technique; and with the rates of Cesarean deliveries rapidly rising, it is important to determine the best method of skin closure in order to optimize patient care.
After a patient is consented she will be randomized into either the control group and receive the standard metallic staples or the experimental group and receive the absorbable staples for her skin closure procedure. One day after her procedure the RN will ask the patient to rate her pain using a 10cm VAS pain scale. Two or three days after the skin closure and before the patient is discharged a short survey about the patient's satisfaction of her scar appearance will be administered. The PI will go back and review the patient's chart to determine the amount of narcotics administered.
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 100 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Masking: | Single (Participant) |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | Closure of Pfannenstiel Skin Incisions After Cesarean Delivery: A Comparison of Metallic Staples Versus Absorbable Staples |
| Study Start Date : | July 2010 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | May 2011 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | May 2011 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Control Group
This group will receive the standard metallic staples to close their incision.
|
Device: Insorb absorbable staples
Patients will be randomized to receive either the standard metallic staples or the Insorb absorbable staples |
|
Experimental: Case Group
This group will receive the Insorb absorbable staples to close their incision.
|
Device: Insorb
Patients will be randomized to receive either standard metallic staples or Insorb absorbable staples |
- Post Operative Pain [ Time Frame: 1 Year ]Post operative pain at post operative day #1 will be measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The scale has a minimum score of 0 representing no pain and a maximum score of 10 representing the worst possible pain.
- Post Operative Pain (3 Days Post-op) [ Time Frame: 1 Year ]Post operative pain at the time of discharge will be measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The scale has a minimum score of 0 representing no pain and a maximum score of 10 representing the worst possible pain.
- Patient Satisfaction [ Time Frame: This will be assessed 3 day after the patient's C-section before they are discharged from the hospital ]Patients will be given a survey prior to being discharged to assess their satisfaction with the appearance of their scar. The survey asked whether patients "strongly agree," "agree," "disagree," or "strongly disagree" with the statement, "I am satisfied with the overall appearance of my incision." Those who responsed "agree" or "strongly agree" were said to be satisfied with the appearance and the outcome is reported as number of participants who were satisfied.
- Patient Satisfaction [ Time Frame: Patient satisfaction will be assessed 6 weeks later at their post-op visit ]Patients will be given a survey at their 6 week post-op visit to assess their satisfaction with the appearance of their scar. The survey asked whether patients "strongly agree," "agree," "disagree," or "strongly disagree" with the statement, "I am satisfied with the overall appearance of my incision." Those who responsed "agree" or "strongly agree" were said to be satisfied with the appearance and the outcome is reported as number of participants who were satisfied.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | Female |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Obstetric service patients (receiving prenatal care from the Faculty Medical Center)
- Women greater than 18 years old
- Singleton gestation
- Cesarean Section performed by Pfannenstiel skin incision
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of drug or alcohol abuse
- Contraindication to post operative NSAID's or Narcotics
- Emergent Cesarean Deliveries
- Less then 18 years of age
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01198691
| United States, Ohio | |
| Good Samaritan Hospital | |
| Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45220 | |
| Responsible Party: | TriHealth Inc. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01198691 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
10018-10-016 |
| First Posted: | September 10, 2010 Key Record Dates |
| Results First Posted: | June 12, 2014 |
| Last Update Posted: | October 9, 2018 |
| Last Verified: | May 2014 |
|
metallic staples absorbable staples Cesarean Delivery |

