The HeartWare™ Ventricular Assist System as Destination Therapy of Advanced Heart Failure: the ENDURANCE Trial (ENDURANCE)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. Identifier: NCT01166347
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : July 21, 2010
Results First Posted : February 28, 2018
Last Update Posted : February 28, 2018
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
HeartWare, Inc.

Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of the HeartWare Ventricular Assist System in patients with chronic Stage D/ New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IIIB/IV left ventricular failure who have received and failed optimal medical therapy, and who are ineligible for cardiac transplantation.

Condition or disease Intervention/treatment Phase
Chronic Heart Failure Device: HeartWare® VAS Device: Control LVAD Not Applicable

Detailed Description:
The HeartWare Ventricular Assist System (VAS) is intended for use in patients with chronic Stage D/NYHA Class IIIB/IV left ventricular failure who have received and failed optimal medical therapy and who are ineligible for cardiac transplantation. The ENDURANCE clinical study is a prospective, randomized, unblinded, multi-center, non-inferiority evaluation of the HeartWare® VAS versus a control group consisting of any FDA-approved Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) approved for destination therapy. Patients are randomized to HeartWare® VAS or control LVAD in a 2:1 ratio. Each patient receiving the HeartWare® VAS or control LVAD is followed to the primary endpoint at 2 years, with a subsequent follow-up period extending to 5 years post implant.

Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 451 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Un-blinded, Multi-Center Clinical Trial to Evaluate the HeartWare™ Ventricular Assist System (VAS) for Destination Therapy of Advanced Heart Failure
Study Start Date : August 2010
Actual Primary Completion Date : May 2014
Actual Study Completion Date : May 2017

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

MedlinePlus related topics: Heart Failure
U.S. FDA Resources

Arm Intervention/treatment
Experimental: HeartWare® VAS
Implant of HeartWare® Ventricular Assist System
Device: HeartWare® VAS
The HeartWare® VAS is an implantable centrifugal pump that was designed to provide flows up to 10 L/min in a small device that is both lightweight and simple to use.
Active Comparator: Control LVAD
Implant of FDA-approved LVADs approved for destination therapy
Device: Control LVAD
Any FDA-approved LVAD for destination therapy.

Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Stroke-Free Survival Probability for 2 Years Post Implant [ Time Frame: Implant to 2 years ]
    The primary endpoint of the trial is stroke-free survival at two years, defined as alive on the originally implanted device, electively transplanted or explanted due to patient recovery and free from disabling stroke (Modified Rankin Scale >=4). The Modified Rankin Scale is scored from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates an absence of symptoms and 6 indicates death. A score of 4 or higher indicates moderately severe or greater disability. Weibull model estimates of survival probability (shown as a percent of 100) are used.

Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Number of Participants With Bleeding [ Time Frame: Implant to two years ]

    Number of participants with bleeding, per Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) definition. The event of bleeding is defined as: An episode of suspected internal or external bleeding that results in one or more of the following:

    1. Death,
    2. Re-operation,
    3. Hospitalization,
    4. Transfusion of red blood cells as follows:

    During first 7 days post implant

    • Adults (≥ 50 kg): ≥ 4U packed red blood cells (PRBC) within any 24 hour period during first 7 days post implant.

    After 7 days post implant

    • Any transfusion of packed red blood cells (PRBC) after 7 days following implant.

  2. Number of Participants With Major Infections [ Time Frame: Implant to two years ]
    Number of participants with major infections, per INTERMACS definition. A major infection is defined as: A clinical infection accompanied by pain, fever, drainage and/or leukocytosis that is treated by anti-microbial agents (non-prophylactic). A positive culture from the infected site or organ should be present unless strong clinical evidence indicates the need for treatment despite negative cultures. The general categories of infection include Localized non-device infection Percutaneous site and/or pocket infection Internal pump component, inflow or outflow tract infection Sepsis

  3. Overall Survival at 2 Years [ Time Frame: Implant to two years ]
    Overall survival is the probability (expressed as a percent of 100) did not died within 2 years post implant via the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants that did not died were censored at the time of last follow-up or 2 years post implant, whichever occurred first.

  4. Number of Participants With Device Malfunctions [ Time Frame: Implant to two years ]

    Number of Participants with device malfunctions per INTERMACS definition. Device malfunction denotes a failure of one or more of the components of the Mechanical Circulatory Support Device (MCSD) system which either directly causes or could potentially induce a state of inadequate circulatory support (low cardiac output state) or death. The manufacturer must confirm device failure. A failure that was iatrogenic or recipient-induced will be classified as an Iatrogenic/Recipient-Induced Failure.

    Device failure should be classified according to which components fails as follows:

    1. Pump failure (blood contacting components of pump and any motor or other pump actuating mechanism that is housed with the blood contacting components).
    2. Non-pump failure (e.g., external pneumatic drive unit, electric power supply unit, batteries, controller, interconnect cable, compliance chamber)

  5. Health Status Change Measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) [ Time Frame: Change from baseline to 2 years ]
    Health Status change as measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score. The KCCQ is a disease-specific patient-reported outcomes measure for patients with heart failure. It consists of 23 items, is comprised of 7 clinically relevant scales (Symptom Frequency, Symptom Burden, Symptom Stability, Physical Limitation, Social Limitation, Quality of Life, and Self-Efficacy), and yields 3 summary scores (Clinical Summary, Total Symptom, and Overall Summary Scores). Scale and summary scores range between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating better health status (e.g., better functioning, fewer symptoms, better quality of life). The Overall Summary Score is calculated as the mean of the Physical Limitation, Total Symptom, Quality of Life and Social Limitation scores. A positive change in score from baseline indicates an improvement.

  6. Health Status Change Measured by EuroQol EQ-5D (Version 3L) [ Time Frame: Change from baseline to 2 years ]
    The EuroQol-5D (version 3L) is a brief self-administered, validated instrument consisting of 2 parts. The second part consists of the EQ-5D general health status as measured by a visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). EQ-5D VAS measures the participant's self-rated health status on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). An adjustment was done on the response where the scores were normalized based on this paper: Johnson JA, Coons SJ. Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12 in an adult US sample. Qual Life Res. 1998 Feb;7(2):155-66.

  7. Change in Functional Status Measured by New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class [ Time Frame: Change from baseline to 2 years ]

    Change in Functional status, as measured by New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. There are 4 levels of NYHA:

    I (Mild): No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea.

    II (Mild): Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest, but ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea.

    III (Moderate): Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest, but less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea.

    IV (Severe): Unable to carry out any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased. Improvement is defined as moving from a higher numerical NYHA level to a lower numerical NYHA level (e.g., IV to III).

  8. Change in Functional Status as Measured by 6-minute Walk [ Time Frame: Change from baseline to 2 years ]
    Change in functional status, as measured by 6-minute walk test.

  9. Length of Initial Hospitalization [ Time Frame: Implant to the end of the initial hospitalization ]
    Length of Initial Hospitalization post implant

  10. Number of Participants Who Had a Re-hospitalization [ Time Frame: Implant to two years ]
    Number of participants who had a re-hospitalization while on the device

  11. Duration of Re-hospitalization [ Time Frame: Implant to two years ]
    Duration of Re-hospitalization while on device

  12. Cause of Re-hospitalization [ Time Frame: Implant to two years ]
    Cause of Re-hospitalization while on device. The reason a participant may have been re-hospitalized was due to an adverse event, the need for an explant, or for various "Other" reasons.

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Must be ≥18 years of age at consent
  2. Body Surface Area (BSA) ≥ 1.2 m2
  3. Patients with advanced heart failure symptoms (New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IIIB or IV) who are: (patient must meet one of the following) 3a. On optimal medical management, including dietary salt restriction and diuretics, for at least 45 out of the last 60 days and are failing to respond; or 3b. In NYHA Class III or NYHA Class IV heart failure for at least 14 days, and dependent on intra aortic balloon pump (IABP) for 7 days and/or inotropes for at least 14 days
  4. Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 25%
  5. LVAD implant is intended as destination therapy
  6. Must be able to receive either the HeartWare® VAS or control LVAD
  7. Female patients of childbearing potential must agree to use adequate contraceptive precautions for the duration of the study.
  8. The patient or legally authorized representative has signed the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Body Mass Index (BMI) > 40
  2. Existence of any ongoing mechanical circulatory support (MCS) other than an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP)
  3. Prior cardiac transplant.
  4. History of confirmed, untreated abdominal or thoracic aortic aneurysm > 5 cm.
  5. Cardiothoracic surgery within 30 days of randomization.
  6. Acute myocardial infarction within 14 days of implant
  7. Patients eligible for cardiac transplantation
  8. On ventilator support for > 72 hours within the four days immediately prior to randomization and implant.
  9. Pulmonary embolus within three weeks of randomization
  10. Symptomatic cerebrovascular disease, stroke within 180 days of randomization or > 80% stenosis of carotid or cranial vessels.
  11. Uncorrected moderate to severe aortic insufficiency. Correction may include repair or bioprosthesis at the time of implant.
  12. Severe right ventricular failure as defined by the anticipated need for right ventricular assist device (RVAD) support or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or right atrial pressure > 20 mmHg on multiple inotropes, right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) <15% or clinical signs
  13. Active, uncontrolled infection diagnosed by a combination of clinical symptoms and laboratory testing.
  14. Uncorrected thrombocytopenia or generalized coagulopathy (e.g., platelet count < 75,000, INR > 2.0 or PTT > 2.5 times control in the absence of anticoagulation therapy).
  15. Intolerance to anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapies or any other peri- or postoperative therapy that the investigator may administer based upon the patient's health status.
  16. Serum creatinine > 3.0 mg/dL within 72 hours of randomization or requiring dialysis (does not include use of ultra-filtration for fluid removal).
  17. Specific liver enzymes [AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT)] > 3 times upper limit of normal within 72 hours of randomization.
  18. A total bilirubin > 3 mg/dl within 72 hours of randomization, or biopsy proven liver cirrhosis or portal hypertension.
  19. Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) is demonstrated to be unresponsive to pharmacological manipulation and the PVR > 6 Wood units.
  20. Patients with a mechanical heart valve .
  21. Etiology of heart failure is due to, or associated with, uncorrected thyroid disease, obstructive cardiomyopathy, pericardial disease, amyloidosis, active myocarditis or restrictive cardiomyopathy
  22. History of severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) or severe restrictive lung disease
  23. Participation in any other study involving investigational drugs or devices
  24. Severe illness, other than heart disease, which would limit survival to < 3 years
  25. Peripheral vascular disease with rest pain or ischemic ulcers of the extremities
  26. Pregnancy
  27. Patient unwilling or unable to comply with study requirements
  28. Technical obstacles, which pose an inordinately high surgical risk, in the judgment of the investigator

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its identifier (NCT number): NCT01166347

  Hide Study Locations
United States, Alabama
The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
United States, Arizona
Mayo Clinic Hospital - Phoenix
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85054
United States, California
The University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
Sharp Memorial
San Diego, California, United States, 92123
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, United States, 94305
United States, Colorado
University of Colorado Hospital - Leprino
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
United States, District of Columbia
Washington Hospital Center
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
United States, Florida
University of Florida - Gainesville
Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital
Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
Tampa Transplant Institute/Tampa General Hospital
Tampa, Florida, United States, 33606
United States, Georgia
The Emory Clinic Inc.
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
Saint Joseph Hospital of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30342
United States, Illinois
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
Advocate Christ Medical Center
Oak Lawn, Illinois, United States, 60453
United States, Indiana
IU Health Methodist
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
Saint Vincent Health
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46260
United States, Kentucky
Jewish Hospital
Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
United States, Louisiana
John Ochsner Heart & Vascular Institute
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70115
United States, Maryland
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
United States, Massachusetts
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
United States, Michigan
University of Michigan Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
United States, Minnesota
Abbott Northwestern
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55407
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
St. Mary's Hospital - Mayo
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55902
United States, Missouri
Washington University/Barnes-Jewish Hospital
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
United States, New Jersey
Newark Beth Israel Medical Center
Newark, New Jersey, United States, 07112
United States, New York
Montefiore Medical Center
Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
New York Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia
New York, New York, United States, 10032
United States, North Carolina
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
United States, Ohio
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
United States, Oregon
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
United States, Pennsylvania
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
University of Pennsylvania Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
UPMC Presbyterian
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
United States, Texas
Baylor University Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
University of Texas - South Western
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
Texas Heart Institute
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
The Methodist Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
United States, Utah
Intermountain Medical Center
Murray, Utah, United States, 84107
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
United States, Virginia
Innova Heart and Vascular Institute Research - Cardiac Vascular & Thoracic Surgery Associates, PC
Falls Church, Virginia, United States, 22042
Sentara Norfolk
Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23507
United States, Washington
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
Northwest Cardiothoracic &Transplant Surgeons
Spokane, Washington, United States, 99204
United States, Wisconsin
Saint Luke's Medical Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53215
Sponsors and Collaborators
HeartWare, Inc.
Principal Investigator: Francis Pagani, MD University of Michigan Hospital
Principal Investigator: Joseph Rogers, MD Duke University

Publications of Results:
Responsible Party: HeartWare, Inc. Identifier: NCT01166347     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: HW004 ENDURANCE
First Posted: July 21, 2010    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: February 28, 2018
Last Update Posted: February 28, 2018
Last Verified: January 2018

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Heart Failure
Heart Diseases
Cardiovascular Diseases