We are updating the design of this site. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

The Community Youth Development Study: A Test of Communities That Care (CYDS III)

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01088542
First Posted: March 17, 2010
Last Update Posted: May 18, 2017
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Collaborator:
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Sabrina Oesterle, University of Washington
  Purpose
The Community Youth Development Study is an experimental test of the Communities That Care (CTC) prevention planning system. It has been designed to find out if communities that were trained to use the CTC system improved public health by reducing rates of adolescent drug use, delinquency, violence, and risky sexual behavior when compared to communities that did not use this approach. The primary purpose of the current continuation study is to investigate whether CTC has long-term effects on substance use, antisocial behavior, and violence, as well as secondary effects on educational attainment, mental health, and sexual risk behavior in young adults at ages 21 and 23.

Condition Intervention
Substance Abuse Juvenile Delinquency Sexual Behavior Criminal Behavior Violence Depression Anxiety Suicide Sexually Transmitted Infection Educational Attainment Behavioral: Communities That Care

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Prevention
Official Title: Long-term Effects of Communities That Care on Young Adults From Small Towns

Further study details as provided by Sabrina Oesterle, University of Washington:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Targeted risk and protective factors, substance use, delinquency, violence [ Time Frame: Baseline through thirteen-year follow-up (age 23) ]
    Surveys of the panel starting in 5th grade (2004) and continuing in grades 6-10, grade 12, and at ages 19, 21, and 23 are used to assess the impact of the intervention on risk and protective factors targeted by communities, substance use, delinquency, and violence. Cross-sectional surveys of all youth in grades 6, 8, 10, and 12 in all participating communities, conducted every 2 years from 2002 through 2012, are also used to assess the impact of the intervention on these primary outcomes.

  • CTC coalition functioning, prevention system transformation, evidence-based program (EBP) implementation [ Time Frame: Baseline through eight-year follow-up (age 18) ]
    Structured telephone interviews with key community leaders, CTC coalition members, and prevention services providers (Community Key Informant Survey, Coalition Board Interview, Community Resource Documentation Survey) conducted in 2001-02, 2004-05, 2007-08, 2009-10, and 2011-12 are used to assess intervention effects on CTC coalition functioning, prevention system transformation, and evidence-based prevention program implementation.


Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Substance use disorder, depression and generalized anxiety disorder, sexual risk behavior [ Time Frame: Nine- through thirteen-year follow-up ]
    Secondary outcomes salient in late adolescence and young adulthood were added to the self-report longitudinal survey beginning at the nine-year follow-up (age 19).


Enrollment: 52323
Study Start Date: October 2003
Study Completion Date: December 2016
Primary Completion Date: December 2016 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
No Intervention: No intervention
Communities in the no intervention arm received no intervention from the project and continued to implement prevention services as usual.
Experimental: Communities That Care Intervention
Communities randomly assigned to the experimental condition received 5 years of training and technical assistance (from 2003 to 2008) to implement the Communities That Care (CTC) prevention system in their communities. They also received 5 years of funding to support a full-time community coordinator and 4 years of seed money to implement tested and effective prevention programs selected as a result of their CTC process.
Behavioral: Communities That Care
The Communities That Care (CTC) system provides communities training and ongoing technical assistance in a structured process for conducting prevention needs assessments using epidemiological data on levels of risk and protective factors for adolescent problem behaviors, selection of tested and effective preventive interventions shown to address community-prioritized factors, implementation of these interventions with fidelity, and evaluation of the community's progress toward its goals. The CTC system is designed to produce a plan for prevention services that is tailored to the needs of each community. CTC is installed in five phases through a manualized series of training events designed to build the capacity of communities to install and sustain the system over time.

  Show Detailed Description

  Eligibility

Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Ages Eligible for Study:   10 Years and older   (Child, Adult, Senior)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Resident at baseline in one of the 24 participating communities
  • Student in the Class of 2011 panel sample or in grades 6, 8, 10, or 12 during a survey year
  • Community leader or prevention service provider in one of the participating communities

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to read and comprehend consent materials and/or survey questions in either english or spanish
  Contacts and Locations
Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01088542


Locations
United States, Washington
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98115
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of Washington
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Sabrina Oesterle, Ph.D. University of Washington
  More Information

Publications:
Fagan AA, Hanson K, Hawkins JD, Arthur MW. Implementing effective community-based prevention programs in the Community Youth Development Study. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 6(3):256-278, 2008.
Quinby RK, Fagan AA, Hanson K, Brooke-Weiss B, Arthur MW, Hawkins JD. Installing the Communities That Care prevention system: Implementation progress and fidelity in a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Community Psychology 36(3):313-332, 2008.

Responsible Party: Sabrina Oesterle, Research Associate Professor, University of Washington
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01088542     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: STUDY00000692
R01DA015183 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract )
First Submitted: March 15, 2010
First Posted: March 17, 2010
Last Update Posted: May 18, 2017
Last Verified: May 2017
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Plan to Share IPD: Yes
Plan Description: We support the goal of making datasets available to researchers in a timely manner to expedite translation of research results into knowledge, products, and procedures to improve human health. With these goals in mind, we have entered into data-sharing collaborations many times with outside researchers. To ensure that the use of these data stay within the legal and ethical constraints of the consent agreement under which they were collected, we have developed a Fair Use Agreement, available upon request, that is signed by the Principal Investigator, Dr. Oesterle, and by the collaborating researcher when agreement has been reached to share study data. As part of the Fair Use Agreement, we ask researchers to abide by the same Data and Safety Monitoring Plan (DSMP) that we adhere to. We will continue to share data with other researchers who meet the terms of our Fair Use Agreement (and DSMP) and share our strong commitment to protection of the rights and privacy of study participants.

Keywords provided by Sabrina Oesterle, University of Washington:
substance use
delinquency
risky sexual behavior
risk factors
protective factors
prevention
community coalitions
systems transformation
violence

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Suicide
Substance-Related Disorders
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Self-Injurious Behavior
Behavioral Symptoms
Chemically-Induced Disorders
Mental Disorders
Infection
Virus Diseases
Genital Diseases, Male
Genital Diseases, Female