Safety and Efficacy of Mipomersen in Patients With Severe Hypercholesterolemia on a Maximally Tolerated Lipid-Lowering Regimen and Who Are Not on Apheresis
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00794664 |
|
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : November 20, 2008
Results First Posted : March 21, 2013
Last Update Posted : September 9, 2016
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Hypercholesterolemia Coronary Heart Disease | Drug: Mipomersen Drug: Placebo | Phase 3 |
Hypercholesterolemia is characterized by markedly elevated low density lipoproteins (LDL). Elevated LDL is a major risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD).
Mipomersen is an antisense drug that reduces a protein in the liver cells called apolipoprotein B (Apo-B). Apo-B plays a role in producing low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (the "bad" cholesterol) and moving it from the liver to one's bloodstream. High LDL-C is an independent risk factor for the development of coronary heart disease (CHD) or other diseases of blood vessels. It has been shown that lowering LDL-C reduces the risk of heart attacks and other major adverse cardiovascular events. The purpose of this study is to determine whether mipomersen safely and effectively lowers LDL-C in severely hypercholesterolemic patients who are on a maximally tolerated lipid-lowering regimen and who are not on apheresis.
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 58 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Masking: | Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Prospective Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Mipomersen in Patients With Severe Hypercholesterolemia on a Maximally Tolerated Lipid-Lowering Regimen and Who Are Not on Apheresis |
| Study Start Date : | January 2009 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | May 2010 |
| Actual Study Completion Date : | October 2010 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Weekly subcutaneous injections for 26 weeks
|
Drug: Placebo
1 mL weekly subcutaneous injections for 26 weeks |
|
Experimental: Mipomersen
200 mg weekly subcutaneous injections for 26 weeks
|
Drug: Mipomersen
200 mg (1 mL), weekly subcutaneous injections for 26 weeks
Other Names:
|
- Percent Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ]LDL-C was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. For patients with triglycerides <400 mg/dL, LDL-C was obtained using Friedewald's calculation; and for patients with triglycerides >=400 mg/dL, LDL-C was directly measured by the central laboratory using ultracentrifugation. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- LDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ]The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Primary Efficacy Time Point [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ]Apo-B was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Apo-B at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ]The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ]Total cholesterol was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Total Cholesterol at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ]The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Percentage Change From Baseline in Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ]Non-HDL-C was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Non-HDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ]The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Percentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ]Triglycerides were measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Triglycerides at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ]The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Percentage Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ]Lipoprotein(a) was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Lipoprotein(a) at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ]The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Percentage Change From Baseline in Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ]VLDL-C was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- VLDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ]The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Change From Baseline in Ratio of Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) to High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ]LDL-C and HDL-C were measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Ratio of LDL-C to HDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ]The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A1 (Apo-A1) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ]Apo-A1 was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Apo-A1 at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ]The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- Percentage Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ]HDL-C was measured in mg/dL. Samples were taken following an overnight fast. Baseline was defined as the average of the screening and Study Day 1 (pre-treatment) assessments. An assessment was not included in this calculation if it was associated with a non-fasting blood draw or was drawn more than 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1. The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
- HDL-C at Baseline and the Primary Efficacy Time Point (PET) [ Time Frame: Baseline (the average of the screening and Day 1 pre-treatment assessments) and the Primary Efficacy Time point (PET) up to week 28 ]The PET was the post-baseline visit, for which LDL-C was assessed, closest to 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Fasting LDL-C ≥200 mg/dL (5.1 mmol/L) at screening and the presence of at least 1 of the following criteria:
- Myocardial infarction (MI)
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)
- Coronary artery disease documented by angiography or any other accepted imaging technique
- Positive exercise test (≥1 mm ST-depression at maximal exercise or test terminated because of angina) or a perfusion defect (e.g., thallium or single photon emission computed tomography)
- Other clinical atherosclerotic diseases: peripheral artery disease, symptomatic carotid artery disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm
- Or, if alternative above were not met, fasting LDL-C ≥300 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L)
- On stable, maximally tolerated statin therapy for 8 weeks
- On stable, medication from an additional class of hypolipidemic agents for 8 weeks.
- On stable, low fat diet for 12 weeks
- Stable weight for 6 weeks
Exclusion Criteria:
- Significant health problems in the recent past including heart attack, stroke, coronary syndrome, unstable angina, heart failure, significant arrhythmia, hypertension, blood disorders, liver disease, cancer, digestive disorders, Type I diabetes, or uncontrolled Type II diabetes
- Apheresis within 3 months prior to Screening or expected to start apheresis during the treatment phase
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00794664
| United States, Florida | |
| Jupiter, Florida, United States, 33458 | |
| Winter Park, Florida, United States, 32792 | |
| United States, Georgia | |
| Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30338 | |
| United States, Kansas | |
| Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160 | |
| United States, Massachusetts | |
| Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114 | |
| United States, Missouri | |
| St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63104 | |
| United States, New Hampshire | |
| Concord, New Hampshire, United States, 03301 | |
| United States, Ohio | |
| Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45212 | |
| United States, South Carolina | |
| Aiken, South Carolina, United States, 29801 | |
| Canada, Manitoba | |
| Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3A 1M5 | |
| Canada, Quebec | |
| Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada, G7H 5H6 | |
| Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H1T 1C8 | |
| Czech Republic | |
| Hardec Kralove, Czech Republic, 500 05 | |
| Pilsen, Czech Republic, 305 99 | |
| Praha, Czech Republic, 128 08 | |
| Uherske Hradiste, Czech Republic, 686 68 | |
| Germany | |
| Berlin, Germany, 13353 | |
| Freiburg, Germany, 79106 | |
| Heidelberg, Germany, 69120 | |
| Koln (Lindenthal), Germany, 50937 | |
| South Africa | |
| Cape Town, South Africa, 7500 | |
| Cape Town, South Africa, 7925 | |
| Gauteng, South Africa, 0157 | |
| Pretoria, South Africa, 0002 | |
| United Kingdom | |
| Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom, GU2 7XX | |
| London, United Kingdom, SE1 7EH | |
| Manchester, United Kingdom, MI3 9WL | |
| Study Director: | Medical Monitor | Genzyme, a Sanofi Company |
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | Kastle Therapeutics, LLC |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00794664 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
MIPO3500108 2008-006020-53 ( EudraCT Number ) |
| First Posted: | November 20, 2008 Key Record Dates |
| Results First Posted: | March 21, 2013 |
| Last Update Posted: | September 9, 2016 |
| Last Verified: | August 2016 |
|
Heart Diseases Coronary Disease Coronary Artery Disease Myocardial Ischemia Hypercholesterolemia Cardiovascular Diseases Hyperlipidemias Dyslipidemias Lipid Metabolism Disorders Metabolic Diseases |
Vascular Diseases Arteriosclerosis Arterial Occlusive Diseases Mipomersen Anticholesteremic Agents Hypolipidemic Agents Antimetabolites Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Lipid Regulating Agents |

