Alprostadil in Maculopathy Study (AIMS)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00619229 |
Recruitment Status :
Terminated
(Interim Analysis: Optimization of study design required.)
First Posted : February 20, 2008
Results First Posted : April 11, 2011
Last Update Posted : October 27, 2014
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Macular Degeneration | Drug: Alprostadil (prostaglandin E1) Other: Placebo | Phase 3 |
Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
Actual Enrollment : | 37 participants |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
Masking: | Double (Participant, Investigator) |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
Official Title: | Confirmatory, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Groups Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Prostaglandin E1 in Subjects With Dry Age-related Macular Degeneration. |
Study Start Date : | July 2006 |
Actual Primary Completion Date : | February 2010 |
Actual Study Completion Date : | February 2010 |

Arm | Intervention/treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Alprostadil
Alprostadil
|
Drug: Alprostadil (prostaglandin E1)
Alprostadil 20 µg ampoules; 60 µg alprostadil/d i.v. for 15 days.
Other Name: Prostavasin |
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo
|
Other: Placebo
Placebo/d i.v. for 15 days |
- Difference in Visual Acuity Between Measurements at 3 Months After Drug Intervention and Measurements at Baseline (Assessed Within Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Chart) [ Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months ]Difference in visual acuity was measured with the standard ETDRS chart with letters arranged in lines of five. The first line is assumed to have letters of a specific size and each subsequent line to consist of letters of a smaller size. The subject starts reading the first line and continues reading the following lines until failing a line. Passing a line means to name at least three of the five letters correctly.
- The Difference in Visual Acuity Between Measurements Immediately After Intervention and Measurements at Baseline [ Time Frame: From baseline to time immediately after intervention ]Difference in visual acuity was measured with the standard ETDRS chart with letters arranged in lines of five. The first line is assumed to have letters of a specific size and each subsequent line to consist of letters of a smaller size. The subject starts reading the first line and continues reading the following lines until failing a line. Passing a line means to name at least three of the five letters correctly.
- The Difference in Visual Acuity Between Measurements at 6 Months After Intervention and Measurements at Baseline [ Time Frame: From baseline to 6 months ]Difference in visual acuity was measured with the standard ETDRS chart with letters arranged in lines of five. The first line is assumed to have letters of a specific size and each subsequent line to consist of letters of a smaller size. The subject starts reading the first line and continues reading the following lines until failing a line. Passing a line means to name at least three of the five letters correctly.
- Progression of the Dry Age-related Macular Degeneration [ Time Frame: From baseline to 6 months ]
Severity of the diagnosed dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) was assessed in comparison to Baseline and classified as
- Progression
- Stabilization
- Amelioration
- Development of a Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration [ Time Frame: From baseline to 6 months ]
A wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is defined as the development of choroidal neovascularization of the "study-eye" (worse eye).
Development is categorized in Yes and No, where Yes means that a subject who had no wet AMD at Screening has developed a wet AMD at Week 29.
- The Difference in Contrast Sensitivity Between Measurements Immediately After Intervention and Measurements at Baseline [ Time Frame: From baseline to time immediately after intervention ]Difference in contrast sensitivity was measured with the Pelli-Robson test, using a chart with letters arranged in groups of three. The first group has unit contrast and each subsequent group has a lower contrast. Passing a group means to read correctly at least two of the three letters. A Pelli-Robson score of 2.0 indicates normal contrast sensitivity of 100 percent. Scores less than 2.0 signify poorer contrast sensitivity. Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity score of less than 1.5 is consistent with visual impairment and a score of less than 1.0 represents visual disability.
- The Difference in Contrast Sensitivity Between Measurements at 3 Months After Intervention and Measurements at Baseline [ Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months ]Difference in contrast sensitivity was measured with the Pelli-Robson test, using a chart with letters arranged in groups of three. The first group has unit contrast and each subsequent group has a lower contrast. Passing a group means to read correctly at least two of the three letters. A Pelli-Robson score of 2.0 indicates normal contrast sensitivity of 100 percent. Scores less than 2.0 signify poorer contrast sensitivity. Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity score of less than 1.5 is consistent with visual impairment and a score of less than 1.0 represents visual disability.
- The Difference in Contrast Sensitivity Between Measurements at 6 Months After Intervention and Measurements at Baseline [ Time Frame: From baseline to 6 months ]Difference in contrast sensitivity was measured with the Pelli-Robson test, using a chart with letters arranged in groups of three. The first group has unit contrast and each subsequent group has a lower contrast. Passing a group means to read correctly at least two of the three letters. A Pelli-Robson score of 2.0 indicates normal contrast sensitivity of 100 percent. Scores less than 2.0 signify poorer contrast sensitivity. Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity score of less than 1.5 is consistent with visual impairment and a score of less than 1.0 represents visual disability.
- The Difference in Color Vision Between Measurements Immediately After Intervention and Measurements at Baseline [ Time Frame: From baseline to time immediately after intervention ]The difference in color vision after intervention in comparison to Baseline was assessed by the investigator as 'Changed from Normal to Pathologic', 'Finding unchanged', and 'Changed from Pathologic to Normal'.
- The Difference in Color Vision Between Measurements at 3 Months After Intervention and Measurements at Baseline [ Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months ]The difference in color vision after intervention in comparison to Baseline was assessed by the investigator as 'Changed from Normal to Pathologic', 'Finding unchanged', and 'Changed from Pathologic to Normal'.
- The Difference in Color Vision Between Measurements at 6 Months After Intervention and Measurements at Baseline [ Time Frame: From baseline to 6 months ]The difference in color vision after intervention in comparison to Baseline was assessed by the investigator as 'Changed from Normal to Pathologic', 'Finding unchanged', and 'Changed from Pathologic to Normal'.

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
Ages Eligible for Study: | 50 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) |
Sexes Eligible for Study: | All |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male and female subjects older than 50 years of age.
- Dry age-related macula degeneration (AMD) with hard drusen and possibly beginning geographic atrophy in one eye
- Visual acuity between 0.2 and 0.7 (logMAR) assessed with ETDRS charts
Exclusion Criteria:
- Dry AMD AREDS category 3 or 4 in both eyes
- Wet AMD in at least one eye
- Detachment of the pigmentary epithelium
- Glaucoma
- Diabetic retinopathy
- Medical history of retinal vein occlusion
- Uveitis
- Cataract surgery during the study
- High myopia (< -6 dpt) with pathological findings of the retina
- Medical history of any opthalmic surgery with complications
- Medical history of cataract surgery without complications within the last 12 weeks
- Medical history of vitrectomy
- AREDS medication within the last 2 days
- Opthalmologic dietary supplements within the last 2 days
- Medical history of retinal hemorrhage
- Cardiac failure (NYHA grade II or higher)
- Inadequately controlled coronary heart disease or cardiac arrhythmia
- Subject has a medical history and/or suspicion of pulmonary edema or pulmonary infiltration
- Subject has a peripheral edema
- Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to enrollment
- Subject has renal insufficiency, compensated retention (creatinine > 1,5 mg/dL)
- Subject has known existing malignant disease
- Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Subject has a venoocclusive lung disease
- Known hepatic disease
- Inadequately controlled or untreated hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 180 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg)
- Subject has upper grade cardiac valvular disorders
- Pregnancy or lactation period
- Known hypersensitivity to PGE1 or to any component of the trial medication
- Subject has a history of chronic alcohol or drug abuse within the past 2 years
- Subject has known lactose intolerance
- Poor general state of health or other criteria
- Subject has other serious illness
- Laboratory values outside the normal range unless considered not clinically relevant by the investigator

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00619229
Germany | |
Berlin, Germany | |
Bochum, Germany | |
Dortmund, Germany | |
Karlsruhe, Germany | |
Muenchen, Germany | |
Muenster, Germany |
Study Director: | UCB Clinical Trial Call Center | +1 877 822 9493 (UCB) |
Responsible Party: | UCB Pharma |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00619229 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
SP0878 2005-005686-11 ( EudraCT Number ) |
First Posted: | February 20, 2008 Key Record Dates |
Results First Posted: | April 11, 2011 |
Last Update Posted: | October 27, 2014 |
Last Verified: | November 2011 |
Alprostadil prostaglandin E1 Prostavasin® macular degeneration |
Macular Degeneration Retinal Degeneration Retinal Diseases Eye Diseases |
Alprostadil Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors Vasodilator Agents Urological Agents |