We updated the design of this site on December 18, 2017. Learn more.
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Augment® Bone Graft (Formerly GEM OS™1 Bone Graft) Compared to Autologous Bone Graft in Foot and Ankle Fusions

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00583375
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : December 31, 2007
Results First Posted : February 23, 2018
Last Update Posted : February 23, 2018
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
BioMimetic Therapeutics

Brief Summary:

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Demonstrate equivalent clinical and radiologic outcomes to the "gold standard" (ABG) in a representative clinical model (hindfoot and ankle fusions)

STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Augment® Bone Graft is an equivalent bone grafting substitute to autologous bone graft in applications as shown by non-inferiority analysis

STUDY RATIONALE: Evaluate a fully synthetic growth-factor enhanced bone graft substitute to facilitate fusion in conditions or injuries requiring bone graft in a representative clinical fusion model and thus the opportunity to provide equivalent union rates as ABG without necessitating an additional invasive procedure to harvest the graft

REGULATORY PHASE: Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) for Premarket Approval (PMA) Application as a bone regeneration system, pivotal phase


Condition or disease Intervention/treatment
Foot Fusion Device: Augment® Bone Graft Procedure: Standard of Care

Study Type : Interventional  (Clinical Trial)
Actual Enrollment : 414 participants
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Foot and Ankle Fusions
Study Start Date : April 2007
Primary Completion Date : January 2010
Study Completion Date : February 2010

Resource links provided by the National Library of Medicine

U.S. FDA Resources

Arm Intervention/treatment
Active Comparator: Group 1

Standard Rigid Fixation plus autograft

Standard of Care: Autologous Bone Graft

Procedure: Standard of Care
Autologous Bone Graft
Experimental: Group 2
Standard Rigid Fixation plus Augment® Bone Graft
Device: Augment® Bone Graft
Augment® Bone Graft



Primary Outcome Measures :
  1. Subjects Fused at 24 Weeks (as Determined by CT Assessment) [ Time Frame: 24 weeks ]
    An independent radiologist examined CT images for all patients' joints and determined whether or not the joint had at least 50% osseous bridging. If a patient demonstrated all joints having at least 50% osseous bridging, this patient was classified as fused.


Secondary Outcome Measures :
  1. Pain on Weight Bearing [ Time Frame: 24 and 52 Weeks ]

    Subjects were asked to stand and report pain on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (with 0 being no pain and 100 being worst pain imaginable).

    1. Clinically significant improvement: ≥20mm decrease from baseline
    2. Detectable improvement: 10-20mm decrease from baseline
    3. Maintained: <10mm decrease from baseline and <10mm increase from baseline
    4. Deteriorated: >10mm increase from baseline

  2. Pain at Fusion Site [ Time Frame: 24 and 52 weeks ]

    Subjects were asked to report current pain level at the fusion site on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (with 0 being no pain and 100 being worst pain imaginable).

    1. Clinically significant improvement: ≥20mm decrease from baseline
    2. Detectable improvement: 10-20mm decrease from baseline
    3. Maintained: <10mm decrease from baseline and <10mm increase from baseline
    4. Deteriorated: >10mm increase from baseline

  3. Foot Function Index (FFI) [ Time Frame: 24 and 52 weeks ]

    The Foot Function Index (FFI) measures the impact of foot pathology on function in terms of pain, disability and activity restriction. The FFI is a self-administered index consisting of 23 items divided into 3 sub-scales. Both total and sub-scale scores are produced.

    1. Clinically significant improvement: ≥10 point decrease from baseline
    2. Improved: 5-10 point decrease from baseline
    3. Maintained: <5 point decrease from baseline and <5 point increase from baseline
    4. Deteriorated: >5 point increase from baseline

  4. AOFAS Hindfoot and Ankle Score [ Time Frame: 24 and 52 weeks ]

    Subjects were asked to report pain, functionality and ability levels while the physician performed assessments based on alignment, abnormality, motion, and stability. The total score ranges from a low of zero to a high of 100, with subscales measuring pain (40 points), function (50 points), and alignment (10 points), with higher scores showing better outcomes.

    1. Clinically significant improvement: ≥20 point increase from baseline
    2. Improved: 10-20 point increase from baseline
    3. Maintained: <10 point increase from baseline and <10 point decrease from baseline
    4. Deteriorated: >10 point decrease from baseline

  5. SF-12 Physical Component Score [ Time Frame: 24 and 52 weeks ]

    The SF-12 Physical Component Score is a validated quality of life metric with a minimum of zero and a maximum of 100, with higher scores denoting higher quality of life.

    1. Maintenance or improvement: ≥0 point increase from baseline
    2. Slight Decline: 0-10 point decrease from baseline
    3. Deteriorated: >10 point decrease from baseline



Information from the National Library of Medicine

Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.


Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
Sexes Eligible for Study:   All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

1) Bone defect in the hindfoot or ankle requiring fusion using open surgical technique with supplemental bone graft/substitute, requiring one of the following procedures:

  • Ankle joint fusion
  • Subtalar fusion
  • Calcaneocuboid fusion
  • Talonavicular fusion
  • Triple arthrodesis (subtalar, talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints)
  • Double fusions (talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous fusion surgery of the proposed fusion site.
  2. The patient uses chronic medications known to affect the skeleton (e.g. glucocorticoid usage > 10mg/day).
  3. Pregnant or a female intending to become pregnant during this study period.
  4. Morbidly obese (BMI > 45 kg/m2)

Information from the National Library of Medicine

To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00583375


  Hide Study Locations
Locations
United States, Arizona
Tucson Orthopaedic Institute
Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85712
United States, California
California Pacific Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine
San Francisco, California, United States, 94118
Santa Cruz Orthopaedic Institute
Santa Cruz, California, United States, 95065
United States, Connecticut
Hartford Hospital Orthopaedic Center
Hartford, Connecticut, United States, 06106
United States, Florida
The Center for Bone & Joint Surgery
Royal Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33411
United States, Georgia
Southern Orthopaedic Center
Savannah, Georgia, United States, 31405
United States, Illinois
Illinois Bone and Joint Institute, Ltd.
Glenview, Illinois, United States, 60025
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, United States, 60153
SIU School of Medicine
Springfield, Illinois, United States, 62794
United States, Kansas
Advanced Orthopaedic Associates
Wichita, Kansas, United States, 67226
United States, Maryland
Union Memorial Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21218
United States, Michigan
Mid Michigan Orthopaedic Institute
East Lansing, Michigan, United States, 48823
Orthopaedic Associates of Grand Rapids
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49525
Henry Ford Hospital - West Bloomfield
West Bloomfield, Michigan, United States, 48322
United States, Nevada
Desert Orthopaedic Center
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89121
United States, New Jersey
UMDNJ
Newark, New Jersey, United States, 07103
United States, New York
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, United States, 10021
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, United States, 10032
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, United States, 14627
United States, North Carolina
Ortho Carolina Research Institute
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28209
Duke Health Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27704
United States, Ohio
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43231
United States, Oregon
Orthopaedic & Neurosurgical Care & Research
Bend, Oregon, United States, 97701
United States, Pennsylvania
The Rothman Institute
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
United States, Rhode Island
University Orthopaedics, Inc
Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02905
United States, Tennessee
Campbell Clinic
Germantown, Tennessee, United States, 38138
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
United States, Texas
Bone and Joint Clinic of Houston
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
United States, Virginia
The Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Center
Arlington, Virginia, United States, 22206
United States, Wisconsin
Marshfield Clinic
Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States, 54449
Canada, Alberta
Peter Lougheed Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T1Y 6H6
Canada, British Columbia
St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6Z 1Y6
Canada, Nova Scotia
Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 3A7
Canada, Ontario
The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5C 1R6
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 2S8
Sponsors and Collaborators
BioMimetic Therapeutics
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Christopher DiGiovanni, M.D. Rhode Island Hospital

Responsible Party: BioMimetic Therapeutics
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00583375     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: BMTI-2006-01
First Posted: December 31, 2007    Key Record Dates
Results First Posted: February 23, 2018
Last Update Posted: February 23, 2018
Last Verified: January 2018

Keywords provided by BioMimetic Therapeutics:
arthritis
ankle pain
foot pain
hindfoot fracture
ankle fracture