Home or Home-like Hospital Birth
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00237601|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : October 12, 2005
Last Update Posted : April 2, 2010
In the Netherlands, which has about 200.000 births per year, maternity care is provided by midwives or general practitioners unless medical reasons necessitate specialist obstetric care. Women with low risk pregnancies are free to decide where to give birth, attended by their midwife or general practitioner, at home or in the hospital, from which they are then discharged within 24 hours. In the Netherlands these hospital births are referred to as "poliklinische bevallingen" (i.e. outpatient deliveries) to indicate that they do not involve formal hospitalisation, or as "verplaatste thuisbevalling" (i.e. relocated home births) to indicate that they are supervised by the same caregivers as the home births without involvement of specialist obstetricians.
In the last two decades a marked increase in the referral rate to obstetricians during childbirth has occurred, especially for nulliparae, both in planned home births and planned hospital births (outpatient deliveries). 90% from all primigravidae will start their pregnancy under care of the primary caregiver (midwife of general practitioner). During the pregnancy 30% will be referred to the secondary caregiver (obstetrician specialist). The other 60% will start labor guided by the primary caregiver. More than 50% of these women will be referred to the obstetrician during labor.
Despite this unique situation of the Dutch maternity care, the differences between home and hospital birth (outpatient deliveries) with regard to effectivity and efficiency have never been investigated. It is also unclear if pregnant women are informed about a 50% risk of being transported to the secondary caregiver/ hospital during labor at home. Neither do we know what their experiences are.
This study aims to investigate the differences between home and hospital deliveries under care of the primary caregiver with regard to effectivity (costs) and efficiency (patient satisfaction) of care.
|Condition or disease||Intervention/treatment||Phase|
|Pregnancy||Other: obstetric care||Phase 3|
|Study Type :||Observational|
|Actual Enrollment :||500 participants|
|Official Title:||Home or Home-like Hospital Birth for Low-risk Nulliparae: Does it Matter?|
|Study Start Date :||January 2006|
|Primary Completion Date :||March 2008|
|Study Completion Date :||December 2008|
Women with the intention to give birth at home
|Other: obstetric care|
Women with the intention to give birth in a short-stay hospital setting
|Other: obstetric care|
- primary outcome: referral rate to secondary care, preferences of women and partners with regard to place of birth. Secondary outcome: costs of home birth and hospital births satisfaction of obstetric care
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00237601
|Academic Hospital Maastricht|
|Maastricht, Netherlands, 6202 HX|
|Study Chair:||Jan G. Nijhuis, Prof dr MD PhD||Maastricht University Medical Center|
|Principal Investigator:||Marijke JC Hendrix, MBA||Maastricht University Medical Center|