Whole-Body MRI and Conventional Imaging in Detecting Distant Metastases in Young Patients With Solid Tumors or Lymphoma
Recruitment status was: Active, not recruiting
RATIONALE: New imaging procedures, such as whole-body MRI, may improve the ability to detect metastatic cancer and determine the extent of disease.
PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying whole-body MRI to see how well it works compared to standard imaging procedures in detecting distant metastases in patients with solid tumors or lymphoma.
|Lymphoma Neuroblastoma Sarcoma||Procedure: computed tomography Procedure: magnetic resonance imaging Procedure: positron emission tomography|
|Study Design:||Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
|Official Title:||Whole-Body MRI in the Evaluation of Pediatric Malignancies|
|Study Start Date:||October 2004|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date:||December 2005 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
- Compare non-inferior diagnostic performance of whole-body MRI (i.e., combination of turbo short-tau inversion-recovery (STIR) and out-of-phase imaging) vs conventional imaging (i.e., the combination of chest CT scan, scintigraphy [bone, gallium, meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG), or optional fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)] and abdominal/pelvic CT scan/MRI as indicated) for detecting distant metastases for use in staging common tumors in pediatric patients.
- Determine the incremental benefit of adding out-of-phase T1-weighted gradient-recalled echo imaging to turbo STIR for detecting distant disease in these patients.
- Determine, preliminarily, the relative accuracies of FDG-PET, whole-body MRI, and a combination of FDG-PET and whole-body MRI in detecting stage IV disease in these patients.
- Determine the effects of multiple factors, including cancer type, site of primary tumor, and patient age, on diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI in these patients.
- Determine the interobserver variability associated with interpreting whole-body MRI exams for detecting distant metastases in these patients.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.
Patients undergo conventional MRI, CT scan, and/or scintigraphy (e.g., bone, meta-iodobenzylguanidine [MIBG], or gallium) and experimental whole-body MRI sequences. Patients may optionally undergo fludeoxyglucose F18 positron emission tomography (FDG-PET).
Patients with a lesion (or lesions) detected on whole-body MRI or FDG-PET at initial staging that are not confirmed by biopsy or other conventional imaging studies at staging repeat standard imaging at 3- to 6-month follow-up.
Patients with an abnormality that is considered highly suspicious for a metastasis or when biopsy proof of that metastasis is obtained receive treatment at the discretion of the treating physician.
Patients are followed annually for 3 years.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 226 patients (45 with neuroblastoma, 54 with rhabdomyosarcoma, 27 with other sarcoma, and 100 with lymphoma) will be accrued for this study within 1 year.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00072488
Hide Study Locations
|United States, California|
|UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center|
|San Francisco, California, United States, 94115|
|United States, Colorado|
|Children's Hospital Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders|
|Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045|
|United States, Florida|
|Nemours Children's Clinic|
|Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32207-8482|
|University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center - Miami|
|Miami, Florida, United States, 33136|
|United States, Georgia|
|AFLAC Cancer Center and Blood Disorders Service of Children's Healthcare of Atlanta - Egleston Campus|
|Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322|
|United States, Illinois|
|Children's Memorial Hospital - Chicago|
|Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60614|
|United States, Indiana|
|Riley's Children Cancer Center at Riley Hospital for Children|
|Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202-5225|
|United States, Iowa|
|Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Iowa|
|Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242-1002|
|United States, Massachusetts|
|Massachusetts General Hospital|
|Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114|
|United States, Missouri|
|Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology at Washington University Medical Center|
|St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110|
|United States, New Jersey|
|Cancer Institute of New Jersey at UMDNJ - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School|
|New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08903|
|United States, New York|
|Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center|
|New York, New York, United States, 10065|
|United States, Pennsylvania|
|Children's Hospital of Philadelphia|
|Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104|
|United States, Rhode Island|
|Hasbro Children's Hospital|
|Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02903|
|United States, South Carolina|
|Hollings Cancer Center at Medical University of South Carolina|
|Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425|
|United States, Tennessee|
|St. Jude Children's Research Hospital|
|Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38105|
|Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center|
|Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232-6838|
|Canada, British Columbia|
|Children's & Women's Hospital of British Columbia|
|Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6H 3V4|
|Canada, Nova Scotia|
|IWK Health Centre|
|Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3K 6R8|
|McMaster Children's Hospital at Hamilton Health Sciences|
|Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 3Z5|
|Hospital for Sick Children|
|Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X8|
|Principal Investigator:||Marilyn J. Siegel, MD||Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology at Washington University Medical Center|