Interstitial Brachytherapy With or Without External-Beam Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Prostate Cancer
|
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00063882 |
|
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified July 2019 by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.
Recruitment status was: Active, not recruiting
First Posted : July 9, 2003
Results First Posted : October 16, 2019
Last Update Posted : November 5, 2021
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays and other sources to damage tumor cells. Interstitial brachytherapy uses radioactive material placed directly into or near a tumor to kill tumor cells. Combining interstitial brachytherapy with external-beam radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether interstitial brachytherapy is more effective with or without external-beam radiation therapy in treating prostate cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of interstitial brachytherapy with or without external-beam radiation therapy in treating patients who have prostate cancer.
| Condition or disease | Intervention/treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| Prostate Cancer | Radiation: Brachytherapy (100/110) Radiation: Brachytherapy (125/145) Radiation: External Beam Radiation Therapy | Phase 3 |
OBJECTIVES:
- Compare the 5-year freedom from progression in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with interstitial brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).
- Compare biochemical (i.e., prostate-specific antigen) failure, biochemical failure by the Phoenix definition, disease-specific survival, local progression, and distant metastases in patients treated with these regimens.
- Compare morbidity and quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.
- Determine the feasibility of collecting Medicare data in a large Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) prostate cancer clinical trial for cost effectiveness and cost utility analysis of combined treatment with interstitial brachytherapy and EBRT.
- Prospectively collect diagnostic biopsy samples from these patients for future biomarker analyses.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to disease stage (T1c vs T2a or T2b), Gleason score (≤ 6 vs 7), prostate-specific antigen (< 10 ng/mL vs 10-20 ng/mL), and prior neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients undergo external beam radiotherapy 5 days a week for 5 weeks. Within 2-4 weeks of radiotherapy, patients undergo interstitial brachytherapy with iodine I 125 or palladium Pd 103 seeds.
- Arm II: Patients undergo interstitial brachytherapy only, as in arm I. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, at 4, 12, and 24 months, and then annually for 3 years.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed at 3-5 weeks, at 4, 6, 9, and 12 months, every 6 months for 4 years, and then annually thereafter.
| Study Type : | Interventional (Clinical Trial) |
| Actual Enrollment : | 588 participants |
| Allocation: | Randomized |
| Intervention Model: | Parallel Assignment |
| Masking: | None (Open Label) |
| Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Phase III Study Comparing Combined External Beam Radiation and Transperineal Interstitial Permanent Brachytherapy With Brachytherapy Alone for Selected Patients With Intermediate Risk Prostatic Carcinoma |
| Study Start Date : | June 2003 |
| Actual Primary Completion Date : | May 2017 |
| Arm | Intervention/treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: EBRT + Brachytherapy
External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and transperineal interstitial permanent brachytherapy (100/110)
|
Radiation: Brachytherapy (100/110)
100 Gy Palladium-103 (P-102) or 110 Gy Iodine-125 (I-125) seeds within 2-4 weeks of completion of external beam radiotherapy. Radiation: External Beam Radiation Therapy Total dose of 45 Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicles as a daily dose of 1.8 Gy given 5 times per week. The prescribed dose is defined at the International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) reference point. Both 3D-conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) are permitted.
Other Name: EBRT |
|
Active Comparator: Brachytherapy Only
Transperineal interstitial permanent brachytherapy (125/145)
|
Radiation: Brachytherapy (125/145)
125 Gy Palladium-103 (P-103) or 145 Gy Iodine-125 (I-125) seeds within 4 weeks of study entry. |
- 5-Year Freedom From Progression Rate [ Time Frame: From randomization to 5 years ]A Freedom from Progression (FFP) failure includes biochemical failure, local failure, distant failure, or death due to any cause. Patients who are failure free with less than 5 years of follow-up or who receive any secondary salvage therapy are censored. Freedom from Progression rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
- Biochemical Failure Rate (Protocol Definition) [ Time Frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years. ]Biochemical failure is defined as having 3 consecutive rises of post-treatment PSA or starting hormones after one or more elevations in post-treatment PSA but before 3 consecutive elevations are documented. The sum of the 3 consecutive rises must exceed 1 ng/mL above the nadir. If 3 consecutive PSA rises occur during the first 24 months followed by a subsequent non-hormonal induced PSA decrease, patients will not be considered PSA failures. Three consecutive rises with any of the 3 PSA values occurring more than 24 months after the implant procedure will constitute a failure. Time to biochemical is defined as time from randomization to the date of first biochemical failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without biochemical failure (competing risk). Biochemical failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Five year rates are reported.
- Biochemical Failure (Phoenix Definition) [ Time Frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years.Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years. ]Biochemical Failure is defined as an increase of 2 ng/ml or more in PSA over the nadir PSA after 24 months from the start of treatment or the start of salvage hormones. Time to biochemical is defined as time from randomization to the date of first biochemical failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without biochemical failure (competing risk). Biochemical failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Five year rates are reported.
- Prostate Cancer Death [ Time Frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years. ]Prostate cancer death is defined as death due to prostate cancer or complications of treatment or death associated with any of the following: 1) further clinical tumor progression occurring after initiation of salvage androgen suppression therapy; 2) a rise that exceeds 1.0 ng/ml in the serum PSA level on at least two consecutive occasions that occurs during or after salvage androgen suppression therapy; and 3) disease progression in the absence of any anti-tumor therapy. Time to prostate cancer death is defined as time from randomization to the date of prostate cancer death, last known follow-up (censored), or death without prostate cancer (competing risk). Prostate cancer death rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Five year rates are reported.
- Local Failure [ Time Frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years. ]Failure is defined as progression (increase in palpable abnormality) at any time, failure of regression of the palpable tumor by two years, and redevelopment of a palpable abnormality after complete disappearance of previous abnormalities. Histologic criteria for local failure are presence of prostatic carcinoma upon biopsy and positive biopsy of the palpably normal prostate more than two years after the start of treatment. Time to local failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of first local failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without local failure (competing risk). Local failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Five year rates are reported.
- Distant Metastases [ Time Frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years. ]Failure is defined as the appearance of any distant metastases. Time to distant metastases is defined as time from randomization to the date of first distant metastases, last known follow-up (censored), or death without distant metastases (competing risk). Distant metastases rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Five year rates are reported.
- Overall Survival [ Time Frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Analysis occurs after all patients had been on study for at least 5 years. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years. ]Failure is defined as death due to any cause. Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death or last known follow-up (censored). Survival rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Five year rates are reported.
- Percentage of Patients With Acute Grade 2+ and Grade 3+ Toxicities [Genitourinary (GU), Gastrointestinal (GI), and Overall] [ Time Frame: Zero to 180 days from the start of radiation ]Acute toxicities are scored according to NCI Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) version 2.0 and will be defined as the worst severity of the toxicity occurring ≤ 180 days from start of radiation. The CTC v 2.0 assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each toxicity based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild, Grade 2 Moderate, Grade 3 Severe, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling, Grade 5 Death related to based.
- Time to Late Grade 3+ Toxicities [Genitourinary (GU), Gastrointestinal (GI), and Overall] [ Time Frame: From 181 days after the start of radiation to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 13.9 years. ]Late toxicities are scored according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Scheme and will be defined as the worst severity of the toxicity occurring > 180 days from radiation start. Grade 3+ GU/GI and overall were analyzed. RTOG/EORTC Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Scheme assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each toxicity based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild, Grade 2 Moderate, Grade 3 Severe, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling, Grade 5 Death related to toxicity. Time to late grade 3+ toxicity is defined as time from randomization to the date of first late grade 3+ toxicity, last known follow-up (censored), or death without late grade 3+ toxicity (competing risk). Late grade 3+ toxicity rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Five year rates are reported.
- Change in Health-related Quality of Life From Baseline to 4-Months as Measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) [ Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months after start of radiation ]The EPIC form is a 50-item, validated tool to assess disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and its therapies and comprises of four summary domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal function). The urinary domain summary score can be separated into 2 distinct subscales: urinary incontinence and urinary irritative. Hormonal domain was excluded as concurrent use of hormones was exclusionary and prior neoadjuvant hormone use was low. Response options for each EPIC item form a Likert scale and multi-item scale scores are transformed linearly to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores representing better health related quality of life. The change score was calculated as the value at 4 months minus the value at baseline. A negative change reflects a decline at 4 months and a positive change reflects an improvement at 4 months.
- Change in Health-Related Quality of Life From Baseline to 24-Months as Measured by EPIC [ Time Frame: Baseline and 24 months after start of radiation ]The EPIC form is a 50-item, validated tool to assess disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and its therapies and comprises of four summary domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal function). The urinary domain summary score can be separated into 2 distinct subscales: urinary incontinence and urinary irritative. Hormonal domain was excluded as concurrent use of hormones was exclusionary and prior neoadjuvant hormone use was low. Response options for each EPIC item form a Likert scale and multi-item scale scores are transformed linearly to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores representing better health related quality of life. The change score was calculated as the value at 24 months minus the value at baseline. A negative change reflects a decline at 24 months and a positive change reflects an improvement at 24 months.
- Change in Health-related Quality of Life From Baseline to 4-Months as Measured by EQ-5D (European Quality of Life-5 Domains) and AUA-SI (American Urological Association-Symptom Index) [ Time Frame: Baseline and 4 months after start of radiation ]
- Change in Health-Related Quality of Life From Baseline to 24-Months as Measured by EQ-5D and AUA-SI [ Time Frame: Baseline and 24 months after start of radiation ]
- Feasibility of Collecting Medicare Data in a Large RTOG Prostate Cancer Clinical Trial for Cost Effectiveness and Cost Utility Analysis of Combined Treatment With Interstitial Brachytherapy and External Beam Radiotherapy [ Time Frame: Analysis occurs after all patients have been potentially followed for 5 years. ]
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contacts provided below. For general information, Learn About Clinical Studies.
| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 120 Years (Adult, Older Adult) |
| Sexes Eligible for Study: | Male |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
-
Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate
- T1c-T2b, N0, M0
-
Intermediate-risk disease, as defined by 1 of the following:
- Gleason score < 7 AND prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 10-20 ng/mL
- Gleason score 7 AND PSA < 10 ng/mL
- No evidence of distant metastases
- Prostate volume ≤ 60 cc by transrectal ultrasonography
- American Urological Association voiding symptom score no greater than 15 (alpha blockers allowed)
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age
- 18 and over
Performance status
- Zubrod 0-1
Life expectancy
- Not specified
Hematopoietic
- Not specified
Hepatic
- Not specified
Renal
- Not specified
Other
- Patients must use effective contraception
- No other malignancy within the past 5 years except basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ at any other site
- No major medical or psychiatric illness that would preclude study therapy
- No hip prosthesis
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
- Not specified
Chemotherapy
- No prior chemotherapy
Endocrine therapy
-
Prior neoadjuvant hormonal therapy allowed provided the following are true:
- Therapy was initiated within 2-6 months of study enrollment
- Therapy was no more than 6 months in duration
- Use of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (e.g., finasteride) is discontinued before registration
- No concurrent hormonal therapy
Radiotherapy
- No prior pelvic radiotherapy
Surgery
- No prior radical surgery for prostate cancer
- No prior transurethral resection of the prostate
- No prior cryosurgery
Other
- No prior transurethral needle ablation of the prostate
- No prior transurethral microwave thermotherapy of the prostate
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT00063882
Show 170 study locations
| Principal Investigator: | Bradley R. Prestidge, MD | Bon Secours Cancer Institute |
Documents provided by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group:
| Responsible Party: | Radiation Therapy Oncology Group |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00063882 |
| Other Study ID Numbers: |
RTOG 0232 CDR0000288823 NCI-2009-01091 ( Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program) ) |
| First Posted: | July 9, 2003 Key Record Dates |
| Results First Posted: | October 16, 2019 |
| Last Update Posted: | November 5, 2021 |
| Last Verified: | July 2019 |
|
stage IIB prostate cancer stage IIA prostate cancer adenocarcinoma of the prostate |
|
Prostatic Neoplasms Genital Neoplasms, Male Urogenital Neoplasms |
Neoplasms by Site Neoplasms Prostatic Diseases |

