Prophylactic Topical Agents in Reducing Radiation-Induced Dermatitis in Patients With Non-inflammatory Breast Cancer (Curcumin-II)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02556632 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : September 22, 2015
Results First Posted : November 6, 2017
Last Update Posted : November 6, 2017
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Study Type | Interventional |
---|---|
Study Design | Allocation: Randomized; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor); Primary Purpose: Supportive Care |
Conditions |
Breast Carcinoma Pain Radiation-Induced Dermatitis Stage 0 Breast Cancer |
Interventions |
Drug: Curcumin-based Gel Procedure: Dermatologic Complications Management Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis Other: Placebo Other: Questionnaire Administration |
Enrollment | 191 |
Recruitment Details | |
Pre-assignment Details |
Arm/Group Title | Arm I (Curcumin-based Gel) | Arm II (HPR Plus) | Arm III (Placebo Gel) |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Patients apply curcumin-based gel topically TID approximately every 4-6 hours beginning on the first day of radiation therapy and continuing until 1 week after completion of radiation therapy. Curcumin-based Gel: Applied topically Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies |
Patients apply HPR Plus™ topically TID approximately every 4-6 hours beginning on the first day of radiation therapy and continuing until 1 week after completion of radiation therapy. Dermatologic Complications Management: Apply HPR Plus topically Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies |
Patients apply placebo gel topically TID approximately every 4-6 hours beginning on the first day of radiation therapy and continuing until 1 week after completion of radiation therapy. Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies Placebo: Apply placebo gel topically Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies |
Period Title: Overall Study | |||
Started | 64 | 65 | 62 |
Completed | 59 | 59 | 53 |
Not Completed | 5 | 6 | 9 |
Reason Not Completed | |||
Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Disliked Intervention | 1 | 1 | 1 |
No Reason | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Personal Issues | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Changed Mind | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Withdrew (Unrelated Medical) | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Unrelated Adverse Event | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Related Adverse Event | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Possibly Related Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Did Not Start RT | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Ineligible | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Disliked Study Procedures | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Treatment or Change Delay | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Arm/Group Title | Arm I (Curcumin-based Gel) | Arm II (HPR Plus) | Arm III (Placebo Gel) | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Patients apply curcumin-based gel topically TID approximately every 4-6 hours beginning on the first day of radiation therapy and continuing until 1 week after completion of radiation therapy. Curcumin-based Gel: Applied topically Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies |
Patients apply HPR Plus™ topically TID approximately every 4-6 hours beginning on the first day of radiation therapy and continuing until 1 week after completion of radiation therapy. Dermatologic Complications Management: Apply HPR Plus topically Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies |
Patients apply placebo gel topically TID approximately every 4-6 hours beginning on the first day of radiation therapy and continuing until 1 week after completion of radiation therapy. Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies Placebo: Apply placebo gel topically Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies |
Total of all reporting groups | |
Overall Number of Baseline Participants | 64 | 65 | 62 | 191 | |
![]() |
[Not Specified]
|
||||
Age, Continuous
Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: Years |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 64 participants | 65 participants | 62 participants | 191 participants | |
59.0 (11.2) | 60.7 (10.5) | 59.8 (9.3) | 59.8 (10.3) | ||
Sex: Female, Male
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 64 participants | 65 participants | 62 participants | 191 participants | |
Female |
64 100.0%
|
65 100.0%
|
62 100.0%
|
191 100.0%
|
|
Male |
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 64 participants | 65 participants | 62 participants | 191 participants | |
Hispanic or Latino |
2 3.1%
|
0 0.0%
|
1 1.6%
|
3 1.6%
|
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
62 96.9%
|
63 96.9%
|
61 98.4%
|
186 97.4%
|
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0 0.0%
|
2 3.1%
|
0 0.0%
|
2 1.0%
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 64 participants | 65 participants | 62 participants | 191 participants | |
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
|
Asian |
0 0.0%
|
1 1.5%
|
1 1.6%
|
2 1.0%
|
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
|
Black or African American |
8 12.5%
|
9 13.8%
|
4 6.5%
|
21 11.0%
|
|
White |
55 85.9%
|
55 84.6%
|
57 91.9%
|
167 87.4%
|
|
More than one race |
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
1 1.6%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
1 0.5%
|
|
Marital Status
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 64 participants | 65 participants | 62 participants | 191 participants | |
Married |
45 70.3%
|
37 56.9%
|
37 59.7%
|
119 62.3%
|
|
Domestic Partner |
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
1 1.6%
|
1 0.5%
|
|
Divorced |
5 7.8%
|
9 13.8%
|
16 25.8%
|
30 15.7%
|
|
Separated |
1 1.6%
|
0 0.0%
|
1 1.6%
|
2 1.0%
|
|
Single |
8 12.5%
|
8 12.3%
|
2 3.2%
|
18 9.4%
|
|
Widowed |
5 7.8%
|
10 15.4%
|
4 6.5%
|
19 9.9%
|
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0 0.0%
|
1 1.5%
|
1 1.6%
|
2 1.0%
|
|
Stage of Disease
[1] Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 64 participants | 65 participants | 62 participants | 191 participants | |
DCIS |
5 7.8%
|
12 18.5%
|
11 17.7%
|
28 14.7%
|
|
Stage I |
34 53.1%
|
29 44.6%
|
22 35.5%
|
85 44.5%
|
|
Stage II |
16 25.0%
|
18 27.7%
|
20 32.3%
|
54 28.3%
|
|
Stage III |
7 10.9%
|
5 7.7%
|
8 12.9%
|
20 10.5%
|
|
Stage IV |
2 3.1%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
2 1.0%
|
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0 0.0%
|
1 1.5%
|
1 1.6%
|
2 1.0%
|
|
[1]
Measure Description:
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is considered the earliest form of cancer and consists of abnormal cells in the milk duct. Stage I.This stage is a small cancer that has not grown deeply into nearby tissues and has not spread to lymph nodes. Stage II and III.These stages indicate larger cancers that have grown more deeply into nearby tissue and may have also spread to lymph nodes. Stage IV.This stage means that the cancer has spread to other organs or parts of the body. Unknown or Not Reported Stage. There is not enough information to determine stage. |
|||||
Location of Breast Cancer
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 64 participants | 65 participants | 62 participants | 191 participants | |
Left |
29 45.3%
|
27 41.5%
|
30 48.4%
|
86 45.0%
|
|
Right |
35 54.7%
|
37 56.9%
|
31 50.0%
|
103 53.9%
|
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0 0.0%
|
1 1.5%
|
1 1.6%
|
2 1.0%
|
|
Prior Chemotherapy
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 64 participants | 65 participants | 62 participants | 191 participants | |
No |
30 46.9%
|
35 53.8%
|
34 54.8%
|
99 51.8%
|
|
Yes |
34 53.1%
|
29 44.6%
|
27 43.5%
|
90 47.1%
|
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0 0.0%
|
1 1.5%
|
1 1.6%
|
2 1.0%
|
|
Currently on Hormone Therapy
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 64 participants | 65 participants | 62 participants | 191 participants | |
No |
52 81.3%
|
48 73.8%
|
48 77.4%
|
148 77.5%
|
|
Yes |
12 18.8%
|
16 24.6%
|
13 21.0%
|
41 21.5%
|
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0 0.0%
|
1 1.5%
|
1 1.6%
|
2 1.0%
|
|
Currently on Herceptin Treatment
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 64 participants | 65 participants | 62 participants | 191 participants | |
No |
56 87.5%
|
56 86.2%
|
58 93.5%
|
170 89.0%
|
|
Yes |
8 12.5%
|
8 12.3%
|
3 4.8%
|
19 9.9%
|
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0 0.0%
|
1 1.5%
|
1 1.6%
|
2 1.0%
|
|
Type of Radiation
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 64 participants | 65 participants | 62 participants | 191 participants | |
IMRT |
1 1.6%
|
2 3.1%
|
2 3.2%
|
5 2.6%
|
|
3D Conformal Whole Breast |
63 98.4%
|
62 95.4%
|
59 95.2%
|
184 96.3%
|
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0 0.0%
|
1 1.5%
|
1 1.6%
|
2 1.0%
|
|
Radiation Boost Planned
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 64 participants | 65 participants | 62 participants | 191 participants | |
No |
4 6.3%
|
3 4.6%
|
2 3.2%
|
9 4.7%
|
|
Yes |
60 93.8%
|
61 93.8%
|
59 95.2%
|
180 94.2%
|
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0 0.0%
|
1 1.5%
|
1 1.6%
|
2 1.0%
|
|
Total Radiation Dose Prescribed
[1] [2] Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: Gray units |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 64 participants | 64 participants | 61 participants | 189 participants | |
58.4 (5.6) | 59.5 (4.5) | 59.1 (5.2) | 59.0 (5.1) | ||
[1]
Measure Description: The international system (SI) unit of radiation dose expressed in terms of absorbed energy per unit mass of tissue. The gray is the unit of absorbed dose and has replaced the rad. 1 gray = 1 Joule/kilogram and also equals 100 rad.
[2]
Measure Analysis Population Description: The demographic data was captured in the Onstudy form but two of the participants did not get to the point to fill that form out.
|
|||||
Breast Field Separation
[1] [2] Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: Centimeters |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 64 participants | 64 participants | 61 participants | 189 participants | |
22.6 (4.0) | 23.8 (4.2) | 22.8 (5.5) | 23.1 (4.6) | ||
[1]
Measure Description: Breast field separation (BFS) evaluates the association of breast size with radiation-induced skin toxicity. BFS can be obtained from the radiation treatment plan for both 3D conformal breast radiation and IMRT. BFS is defined as the distance between the medial and lateral tangential fields. The tangential fields are created during simulation to achieve uniform dose distribution to the breast volume. The tangential fields align with the medial and lateral contours of the breast. BFS is similar to the width measurement of the breast and is calculated as part of the radiation treatment plan.
[2]
Measure Analysis Population Description: The demographic data was captured in the Onstudy form but two of the participants did not get to the point to fill that form out.
|
Name/Title: | Julie Ryan Wolf, PhD, MPH; Associate Professor of Dermatology and Radiation Oncology |
Organization: | University of Rochester |
Phone: | 585-276-3862 |
EMail: | julie_ryan@urmc.rochester.edu |
Responsible Party: | Gary Morrow, University of Rochester NCORP Research Base |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT02556632 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
URCC14079 NCI-2015-00869 ( Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program) ) URCC14079 ( Other Identifier: University of Rochester NCORP Research Base ) URCC-14079 ( Other Identifier: DCP ) R21CA178648 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract ) UG1CA189961 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract ) |
First Submitted: | July 23, 2015 |
First Posted: | September 22, 2015 |
Results First Submitted: | August 28, 2017 |
Results First Posted: | November 6, 2017 |
Last Update Posted: | November 6, 2017 |