Evaluation of iFR vs FFR in Stable Angina or Acute Coronary Syndrome (iFR Swedeheart)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02166736|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : June 18, 2014
Last Update Posted : January 12, 2017
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
No Study Results Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for this Study
|Recruitment Status :||Completed|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||October 2015|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||December 2016|
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Götberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir IJ, Sandhall L, Danielewicz M, Jakobsen L, Olsson SE, Öhagen P, Olsson H, Omerovic E, Calais F, Lindroos P, Maeng M, Tödt T, Venetsanos D, James SK, Kåregren A, Nilsson M, Carlsson J, Hauer D, Jensen J, Karlsson AC, Panayi G, Erlinge D, Fröbert O; iFR-SWEDEHEART Investigators. Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1813-1823. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1616540. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
Götberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir I, Sandhall L, Omerovic E, James SK, Erlinge D, Fröbert O. Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve guided intervention (iFR-SWEDEHEART): Rationale and design of a multicenter, prospective, registry-based randomized clinical trial. Am Heart J. 2015 Nov;170(5):945-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.031. Epub 2015 Aug 15.