We are updating the design of this site. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Conservative Non-Invasive Versus Routine Invasive Management in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Patients With Non ST Elevation Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (CABG-ACS)

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01895751
First Posted: July 10, 2013
Last Update Posted: July 20, 2016
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Collaborator:
University of Glasgow
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Colin Berry, NHS National Waiting Times Centre Board
No Study Results Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for this Study
  Study Status: This study has been completed.
  Study Completion Date: July 2016
  Primary Completion Date: July 2016 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Publications:
Sixth National Audit Cardiac Surgical Database Report (2008). Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland.
British Cardiovascular Intervention Society (BCIS) Audit of Adult Interventional Procedures (2010). Ludman PF on behalf of BCIS and the National Institute of Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR).

Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):