We are updating the design of this site. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Desensitising Celiac Disease Patients With the Human Hookworm (NaCeD)

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01661933
First Posted: August 10, 2012
Last Update Posted: October 20, 2014
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Collaborator:
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Dr John Croese, The Prince Charles Hospital
Results First Submitted: September 21, 2014  
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment;   Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor);   Primary Purpose: Prevention
Condition: Celiac Disease
Intervention: Biological: Necator americanus

  Participant Flow
  Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
Of 20 potential candidates, 2 could not be contacted (address changed), 1 was not interested, and 5 were unavailable (travel-2, pregnancy-2 or study-1 commitments). Twelve enrolled in September 2012. 8 committed to 3 endoscopic procedures and 2 committed to two endoscopies.

Pre-Assignment Details
Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
No text entered.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Necator Americanus, Gluten Challenge Single arm, vertical. Necator americanus: Subjects were inoculated with 20 3rd stage Na larvae (10 + 10 over 4-8 weeks). After hookworm colonization, a micro-dose gluten challenge of 10 mg daily for 6 weeks, followed by 50 mg daily for 6 weeks was completed. After this, a detailed assessment including histology was performed to establish it safe for the participant to proceed to a low-dose gluten challenge of 25 mg daily and 1 G (15-20 G of pasta) twice weekly for 12 weeks. After low-dose challenge, a further evaluation was undertaken before inviting participants to undertake a gluten challenge of 3 G daily over for 2 weeks (preceded by a micro-dose 2 week lead-in).

Participant Flow for 3 periods

Period 1:   Gluten Micro-challenge
    Necator Americanus, Gluten Challenge
STARTED   12 [1] 
COMPLETED   12 [2] 
NOT COMPLETED   0 
[1] All 12 enrolled completed hookworm inoculation and gluten micro-challenge.
[2] Two gluten intolerant participants did not proceed to the low-dose challenge.

Period 2:   Low-dose Gluten Challenge
    Necator Americanus, Gluten Challenge
STARTED   12 [1] 
COMPLETED   10 [2] 
NOT COMPLETED   2 
Physician Decision                2 
[1] One was symptomatically intolerant to gluten >25 mg. One had active CeD pre- & post-micro-challenge
[2] Two had challenge interrupted for 1-2 weeks. All completed challenge.

Period 3:   High-dose Gluten Challenge
    Necator Americanus, Gluten Challenge
STARTED   10 [1] 
COMPLETED   8 
NOT COMPLETED   2 
Withdrawal by Subject                2 
[1] 2 of 10 available after post-GC-1g did not enroll for reasons unrelated to gluten.



  Baseline Characteristics


  Outcome Measures
  Show All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   Duodenal Villus Height:Crypt Depth   [ Time Frame: Week -24 to -36 ]

2.  Secondary:   Intraepithelial Lymphocyte Count   [ Time Frame: Week-24 and -36 ]

3.  Secondary:   Number of Participants With 2 Points Increase in Marsh Score Post GC-1g   [ Time Frame: Longitudinal change between week-24 and week-36 ]

4.  Secondary:   Serum Anti-tissue Transglutaminase Antibodies Measured as International Units/mL (IU/mL)   [ Time Frame: Anti-tTG IU/mL levels pre-trial, mid-trial and after 3 gram/day gluten challenge ]


  Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events


  Limitations and Caveats
  Hide Limitations and Caveats

Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
Open study. Small number. Historical controls.


  More Information
  Hide More Information

Certain Agreements:  
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.


Results Point of Contact:  
Name/Title: Dr John Croese. The Chief Investigator
Organization: The Prince Charles Hospital
phone: +61733716164
e-mail: jcroese@bigpond.com


Publications:

Responsible Party: Dr John Croese, The Prince Charles Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01661933     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: AU/3/BOBD012
First Submitted: August 6, 2012
First Posted: August 10, 2012
Results First Submitted: September 21, 2014
Results First Posted: October 13, 2014
Last Update Posted: October 20, 2014