Study of Apremilast to Treat Subjects With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis (POSTURE)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01583374 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : April 24, 2012
Results First Posted : March 17, 2015
Last Update Posted : May 12, 2020
|
Sponsor:
Amgen
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Amgen
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Study Type | Interventional |
---|---|
Study Design | Allocation: Randomized; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
Condition |
Ankylosing Spondyloarthritis |
Interventions |
Drug: Apremilast tablet 20 mg Drug: Apremilast tablet 30 mg BID Drug: Placebo |
Enrollment | 490 |
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | The study enrolled participants at 88 study sites and in 18 countries (Australia, Austria, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Germany, Hungary, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, Sweden, and the United States [US]). |
Pre-assignment Details |
Randomized participants were stratified by the following 2 parameters:
|
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Apremilast 20 mg | Apremilast 30 mg | Placebo / Apremilast 30 mg Early Escape (EE) | Placebo/Apremilast 30 mg Crossover (XO) | Apremilast 30 mg /Apremilast 30 mg EE | Apremilast 20 mg /Apremilast 30 mg EE | Apremilast 30 mg /Apremilast 30 mg Second Escape (SE) | Apremilast 20 mg/Apremilast 30 mg SE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Participants initially randomized to receive placebo tablets BID in the 24-week placebo-controlled phase. | Participants initially randomized to 20 mg apremilast tablets BID in the 24-week placebo-controlled phase continued to receive 20 mg apremilast tablets BID for up to 4.5 years in the long-term extension phase. | Participants initially randomized to 30 mg apremilast tablets BID in the 24-week placebo-controlled phase, continued to receive 30 mg apremilast tablets BID for up to 4.5 years in the long-term extension phase. | Participants initially randomized to receive placebo tablets BID who did not have at least 20% improvement or ≥ 1 unit improvement from baseline in 2 out of 4 of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) domains at Week 16 were transitioned to 30 mg apremilast tablets BID and continued to receive 30 mg apremilast tablets BID for up to 4.5 years in the long-term extension phase. | Participants initially randomized to placebo tablets BID in the 24-week placebo controlled phase were transitioned to 30 mg apremilast tablets BID at Week 24 and continued to receive 30 mg apremilast tablets BID for up to 4.5 years in the long-term extension phase. | Participants initially randomized to 30 mg apremilast tablets BID in the 24-week placebo-controlled phase who did not have at least 20% improvement or a ≥ 1-unit improvement from baseline in 2 of the 4 ASAS domains at Week 16 continued to receive 30 mg apremilast tablets BID for up to 4.5 years in the long-term extension phase. | Participants initially randomized to 20 mg apremilast tablets BID who did not have at least 20% improvement or ≥ 1 unit improvement from baseline in 2 out of 4 of the ASAS domains at Week 16 were transitioned to 30 mg apremilast tablets BID and continued to receive 30 mg apremilast tablets BID for up to 4.5 years in the long-term extension phase. | Participants initially randomized to 30 mg apremilast tablets BID who did not have at least 20% improvement or ≥ 1 unit improvement from baseline in 2 out of 4 of the ASAS domains from baseline at Week 24 continued to receive 30 mg apremilast tablets BID (second escape) for up to 4.5 years in the long-term extension phase. | Participants initially randomized to 20 mg apremilast tablets BID who did not have at least 20% improvement or ≥ 1 unit improvement from baseline in 2 out of 4 of the ASAS domains at Week 24 were transitioned to 30 mg apremilast tablets BID (second escape) and continued to receive 30 mg apremilast tablets BID for up to 4.5 years in the long-term extension phase. |
Period Title: Placebo-controlled Phase (Week 0-24) | |||||||||
Started | 164 | 163 | 163 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Received Treatment | 164 | 163 | 163 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Completed Week 16 | 150 | 151 | 144 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Early Escape at Week 16 | 51 [1] | 49 | 49 [1] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Completed | 145 [2] | 147 [2] | 138 [2] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Not Completed | 19 | 16 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reason Not Completed | |||||||||
Adverse Event | 6 | 7 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Lack of Efficacy | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Non-compliance with Study Drug | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Withdrawal by Subject | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Protocol Violation | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
[1]
One participant who escaped early did not complete Week 24
[2]
Completed = participants who completed the Placebo-controlled Phase
|
|||||||||
Period Title: Extension Phase (Weeks 24 to 52) | |||||||||
Started [1] | 0 | 74 | 65 | 47 | 91 | 48 | 48 | 25 | 23 |
Completed | 0 | 69 | 61 | 41 | 85 | 43 | 43 | 22 | 21 |
Not Completed | 0 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 2 |
Reason Not Completed | |||||||||
Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Adverse Event | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 2 |
Non-compliance study drug | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
[1]
9 participants who completed Week 24 did not continue in the extension phase.
|
|||||||||
Period Title: Long-Term Extension Phase Weeks 52-260 | |||||||||
Started [1] | 0 | 66 | 61 | 35 | 81 | 39 | 38 | 21 | 20 |
Completed | 0 | 40 | 41 | 22 | 50 | 22 | 20 | 12 | 10 |
Not Completed | 0 | 26 | 20 | 13 | 31 | 17 | 18 | 9 | 10 |
Reason Not Completed | |||||||||
Adverse Event | 0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 10 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
Noncomplinace with Study Drug | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
Death | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Miscellaneous | 0 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
[1]
24 participants who completed Week 52 did not continue in the Week 52-260 study period
|
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Placebo | Apremilast 20 mg | Apremilast 30 mg | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Participants initially randomized to receive placebo tablets BID in the 24-week placebo-controlled phase. | Participants initially randomized to 20 mg apremilast tablets BID in the 24-week placebo-controlled phase continued to receive 20 mg apremilast tablets BID for up to 4.5 years in the long-term extension phase. | Participants initially randomized to 30 mg apremilast tablets BID in the 24-week placebo-controlled phase. | Total of all reporting groups | |
Overall Number of Baseline Participants | 164 | 163 | 163 | 490 | |
![]() |
The modified Intent to Treat (mITT) population included all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of investigational product (IP); Five participants did not have a baseline SF-36 Physical Component Summary score.
|
||||
Age, Continuous
Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: Years |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | 163 participants | 163 participants | 490 participants | |
44.0 (12.89) | 45.2 (11.90) | 44.8 (11.75) | 44.7 (12.18) | ||
Sex: Female, Male
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | 163 participants | 163 participants | 490 participants | |
Female |
40 24.4%
|
42 25.8%
|
56 34.4%
|
138 28.2%
|
|
Male |
124 75.6%
|
121 74.2%
|
107 65.6%
|
352 71.8%
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | 163 participants | 163 participants | 490 participants | |
Hispanic or Latino |
5 3.0%
|
1 0.6%
|
1 0.6%
|
7 1.4%
|
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
158 96.3%
|
159 97.5%
|
162 99.4%
|
479 97.8%
|
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
1 0.6%
|
3 1.8%
|
0 0.0%
|
4 0.8%
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | 163 participants | 163 participants | 490 participants | |
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
|
Asian |
2 1.2%
|
2 1.2%
|
0 0.0%
|
4 0.8%
|
|
Black or African American |
1 0.6%
|
2 1.2%
|
2 1.2%
|
5 1.0%
|
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
1 0.6%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
1 0.2%
|
|
White |
158 96.3%
|
154 94.5%
|
158 96.9%
|
470 95.9%
|
|
Other |
1 0.6%
|
2 1.2%
|
3 1.8%
|
6 1.2%
|
|
Missing |
1 0.6%
|
3 1.8%
|
0 0.0%
|
4 0.8%
|
|
Duration of Ankylosing Spondylitis (Lower Back Pain and Stiffness)
Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: Years |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | 163 participants | 163 participants | 490 participants | |
10.40 (10.375) | 11.06 (11.302) | 10.32 (9.887) | 10.60 (10.521) | ||
Duration of Ankylosing Spondylitis
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | 163 participants | 163 participants | 490 participants | |
≤ 2 years |
41 25.0%
|
48 29.4%
|
40 24.5%
|
129 26.3%
|
|
>2 to ≤ 5 years |
29 17.7%
|
23 14.1%
|
26 16.0%
|
78 15.9%
|
|
>5 to ≤ 10 years |
33 20.1%
|
29 17.8%
|
33 20.2%
|
95 19.4%
|
|
>10 years |
61 37.2%
|
63 38.7%
|
64 39.3%
|
188 38.4%
|
|
Baseline Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) Score (0 - 10 NRS)
[1] Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: Units on a Scale |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | 163 participants | 163 participants | 490 participants | |
5.76 (2.194) | 5.75 (2.061) | 5.65 (2.100) | 5.72 (2.115) | ||
[1]
Measure Description: The BASFI is a composite score based on a self-administered survey of 10 questions using a 0 to 10 unit numerical rating scale (NRS) that assesses the degree of mobility and functional ability. The survey consists of 8 questions regarding function in AS and the last 2 reflect the ability to manage everyday life. The patient marks a box with an X on a 0 to 10 unit NRS for 10 questions; the left-hand box of 0 = easy; the right-hand box = impossible. The resulting 0 to 100 score is divided by 10 to give a final 0 to 10 BASFI score. A higher score correlates to reduced functional ability.
|
|||||
Baseline Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Score (0 - 10 NRS)
[1] Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: Units on a Scale |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | 163 participants | 163 participants | 490 participants | |
6.45 (1.319) | 6.46 (1.352) | 6.37 (1.357) | 6.42 (1.341) | ||
[1]
Measure Description: The BASDAI is a composite score based on a self-administered survey of 6 questions using a 0 to 10 unit NRS that assesses for 5 major symptoms of AS: fatigue; spinal pain; peripheral joint pain/swelling; areas of localized tenderness; morning stiffness severity upon wakening; morning stiffness duration upon wakening. To give each of the 5 symptoms equal weighting, the mean of the 2 scores relating to morning stiffness is taken. The resulting 0 to 50 score is divided by 5 to give a final 0 to 10 BASDAI score. A score of 4 or greater is considered to be indicative of active AS disease.
|
|||||
Baseline Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)-Linear Score (0 - 10 NRS)
[1] [2] Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: Units on a Scale |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 163 participants | 163 participants | 161 participants | 487 participants | |
4.36 (1.608) | 4.63 (1.721) | 4.41 (1.700) | 4.47 (1.678) | ||
[1]
Measure Description: The BASMI-Linearis designed to assess axial status (ie, cervical, dorsal and lumbar spine, hips, and pelvic soft tissue) and to define clinically significant changes in spinal movement. 5 dimensions of movement (lateral lumbar flexion, tragus to wall, forward lumbar flexion, maximal intermalleolar distance, and cervical rotation) were measured and normalized on 0 to 10 unit NRS. The average of these scores is the total BASMI score, with a higher value indicating more severe limitation in spinal mobility.
[2]
Measure Analysis Population Description: Three participants did not have baseline BASMI data.
|
|||||
Baseline Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) Summary Score (0-18)
[1] [2] Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: Units on a Scale |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | 162 participants | 160 participants | 486 participants | |
9.10 (4.639) | 8.38 (4.548) | 8.62 (4.935) | 8.50 (4.738) | ||
[1]
Measure Description: The ASQoL is a validated disease specific patient reported outcomes instrument to assess the impact of ankylosing spondylitis on the QoL of individuals with emphasis on the ability of the person to fulfill his or her needs. It consisted of 18 items requesting a yes (score=1) or no (score=0) response to questions related to the impact of pain on sleep, mood, motivation, ability to cope, activities of daily living, independence, relationships, and social life. The summary score ranges 0-18 with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.
[2]
Measure Analysis Population Description: Four participants did not have a baseline ASQoL score.
|
|||||
Baseline Physical Component Summary Score of Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Survey
[1] [2] Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: Units on a Scale |
|||||
Number Analyzed | 164 participants | 162 participants | 159 participants | 485 participants | |
32.57 (7.821) | 31.89 (8.561) | 32.16 (8.846) | 32.20 (8.402) | ||
[1]
Measure Description: The SF- 36 is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease and consists of 36 questions in 8 domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). Two overall summary scores can also be obtained-a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS). The PCS and MCS scores are transformed to have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with higher scores indicating better health. Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health.
[2]
Measure Analysis Population Description: Five participants did not have a baseline SF-36 Physical Component Summary score.
|
Outcome Measures
Adverse Events
Limitations and Caveats
[Not Specified]
More Information
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts
the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
The investigator shall have the right to publish and/or present study data provided that the investigator shall (i) furnish the sponsor a copy of any proposed publication or presentation generally sixty (60) days in advance of the submission, (ii) delete any confidential information of the sponsor, and (iii) delay submission for generally up to ninety (90) days to permit the preparation and filing of intellectual property applications or until sponsor gives its consent in a timely manner.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title: | Anne McClain, Senior Study Manager |
Organization: | Celgene Corporation |
Phone: | 888-260-1599 |
EMail: | ClinicalTrialDisclosure@Celgene.com |
Publications:
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Responsible Party: | Amgen |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01583374 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
CC-10004-AS-001 2011-001555-37 ( EudraCT Number ) |
First Submitted: | April 20, 2012 |
First Posted: | April 24, 2012 |
Results First Submitted: | February 24, 2015 |
Results First Posted: | March 17, 2015 |
Last Update Posted: | May 12, 2020 |