This site became the new on June 19th. Learn more.
Show more Menu IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more... Menu IMPORTANT: Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more... Menu
Give us feedback

Child Health Improvement Through Computer Automation (CHICA) Highlighting Study

This study has been completed.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Aaron Carroll, Indiana University Identifier:
First received: April 18, 2012
Last updated: April 10, 2017
Last verified: April 2017
Results First Received: December 8, 2016  
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized;   Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment;   Masking: Outcomes Assessor;   Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
Condition: Physician Behavior
Interventions: Other: Receiving Highlighted Prompts
Other: Receiving Non-highlighted Prompts

  Participant Flow
  Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
No text entered.

Pre-Assignment Details
Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
While physicians were the ones that received prompts, the prompts are the unit of analysis.

Reporting Groups
Highlighted Prompts Physicians received highlighted prompts.
Non-highlighted Prompts Physicians received prompts that were not highlighted.

Participant Flow:   Overall Study
    Highlighted Prompts   Non-highlighted Prompts
STARTED   1076   1161 
COMPLETED   1076   1161 

  Baseline Characteristics
  Hide Baseline Characteristics

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
No text entered.

Reporting Groups
Receiving Highlighted Prompts These patients received highlighted prompts.
Receiving Non-highlighted Prompts These patients received prompts that were not highlighted.
Total Total of all reporting groups

Baseline Measures
   Receiving Highlighted Prompts   Receiving Non-highlighted Prompts   Total 
Overall Participants Analyzed 
[Units: Participants]
 1076   1161   2237 
[Units: Participants]
Count of Participants
<=18 years      1076 100.0%      1161 100.0%      2237 100.0% 
Between 18 and 65 years      0   0.0%      0   0.0%      0   0.0% 
>=65 years      0   0.0%      0   0.0%      0   0.0% 
Sex/Gender, Customized [1] 
[Units: Participants]
Count of Participants
Unknown   1076   1161   2237 
[1] We did not record gender for this study, and so it is not known.

  Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   The Number of Prompts That Were Responded to   [ Time Frame: 1 year ]

  Serious Adverse Events

  Other Adverse Events

  Limitations and Caveats
  Hide Limitations and Caveats

Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.

  More Information
  Hide More Information

Certain Agreements:  
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact:  
Name/Title: Aaron E. Carroll, MD, MS
Organization: Indiana University School of Medicine
phone: 3172789616

Responsible Party: Aaron Carroll, Indiana University Identifier: NCT01583101     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: CHICA_Highlight_Study
Study First Received: April 18, 2012
Results First Received: December 8, 2016
Last Updated: April 10, 2017