Echogenic Versus Stimulating Needle and Catheter for Sciatic Blocks (Echostim1)
This study has been completed.
Lawson Health Research Institute
The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Sugantha Ganapathy, Lawson Health Research Institute
First received: October 11, 2011
Last updated: April 19, 2013
Last verified: January 2012
No Study Results Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for this Study
|Study Status:||This study has been completed.|
|Study Completion Date:||January 2013|
|Primary Completion Date:||January 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
Brookes J, Sondekoppam R, Armstrong K, Uppal V, Dhir S, Terlecki M, Ganapathy S. Comparative evaluation of the visibility and block characteristics of a stimulating needle and catheter vs an echogenic needle and catheter for sciatic nerve block with a low-frequency ultrasound probe. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Dec;115(6):912-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev351.