Foley Catheter Versus Cervidil for Induction of Labor at Term
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01402050 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : July 26, 2011
Results First Posted : February 6, 2020
Last Update Posted : March 2, 2020
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Study Type | Interventional |
---|---|
Study Design | Allocation: Randomized; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: None (Open Label); Primary Purpose: Treatment |
Condition |
Labor Induction |
Interventions |
Drug: CERVIDIL (Dinoprostone) Device: FOLEY BALLOON |
Enrollment | 376 |
Recruitment Details | |
Pre-assignment Details |
Arm/Group Title | FOLEY BALLOON | CERVIDIL |
---|---|---|
![]() |
Comparing Foley balloon to Cervidil for decreased time from the start of the induction process to delivery is the aim of this RCT. Subjects randomized into the Foley Balloon Arm received a Foley Balloon past the cervical os filled with 30 cc of sterile water, and catheter taped to inside of maternal thigh. Catheter was removed for any of the 5 reasons: expulsion, nonreasurring fetal heart rate tracing mandating placement of internal monitors, tachysystole, spontaneous membrane rupture, or 12 hours elapsed since placement. Key words: FOLEY BALLOON: INDUCTION OF LABOR |
CERVIDIL (Dinoprostone) Arm: Subjects randomized to this arm received dinoprostone controlled release vaginal insert (standard dosing Cervidil, 0.3mg/hour of dinoprostone over 12 hours). The vaginal insert was placed in the posterior fornix and was removed for any of the 5 reasons stated for the Foley catheter Arm description. Fetal heart rate and uterine contractions were continuously monitored per standard. Time of placement was noted as the time of Labor Induction initiation and time of delivery was noted as the end time of Labor Induction. Key word: INDUCTION OF LABOR |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
Started | 185 | 191 |
Completed | 185 | 191 |
Not Completed | 0 | 0 |
Arm/Group Title | FOLEY BALLOON | CERVIDIL | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Comparing foley balloon to cervidil for decreased time from the start of the induction process to delivery FOLEY BALLOON: INDUCTION OF LABOR |
CERVIDIL (Dinoprostone): INDUCTION OF LABOR | Total of all reporting groups | |
Overall Number of Baseline Participants | 185 | 191 | 376 | |
![]() |
[Not Specified]
|
|||
Age, Continuous
Mean (Standard Deviation) Unit of measure: Years |
||||
Number Analyzed | 185 participants | 191 participants | 376 participants | |
28.0 (6.4) | 26.9 (5.9) | 27.5 (6.2) | ||
Sex: Female, Male
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
||||
Number Analyzed | 185 participants | 191 participants | 376 participants | |
Female |
185 100.0%
|
191 100.0%
|
376 100.0%
|
|
Male |
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
0 0.0%
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Measure Type: Count of Participants Unit of measure: Participants |
Number Analyzed | 185 participants | 191 participants | 376 participants |
White |
87 47.0%
|
81 42.4%
|
168 44.7%
|
|
Black |
34 18.4%
|
33 17.3%
|
67 17.8%
|
|
Hispanic |
44 23.8%
|
60 31.4%
|
104 27.7%
|
|
Other |
20 10.8%
|
17 8.9%
|
37 9.8%
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Measure Type: Number Unit of measure: Participants |
||||
United States | Number Analyzed | 185 participants | 191 participants | 376 participants |
185 | 191 | 376 |
Name/Title: | Ana Braescu |
Organization: | Phoenix Perinatal Associates - Mednax |
Phone: | 602-614-0488 |
EMail: | ana_braescu@mednax.com |
Responsible Party: | Pediatrix |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01402050 |
Other Study ID Numbers: |
01-10-0012 |
First Submitted: | April 8, 2011 |
First Posted: | July 26, 2011 |
Results First Submitted: | January 24, 2020 |
Results First Posted: | February 6, 2020 |
Last Update Posted: | March 2, 2020 |