ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Efficacy Study Comparing 2% Chlorhexidine in 70% Isopropyl Alcohol Versus 2% Aqueous Chlorhexidine

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01270776
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified May 2013 by Vibhuti Shah, Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada.
Recruitment status was:  Recruiting
First Posted : January 5, 2011
Last Update Posted : May 14, 2013
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Vibhuti Shah, Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada

No Study Results Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for this Study
  Recruitment Status : Unknown
  Estimated Primary Completion Date : January 2014
  Estimated Study Completion Date : January 2014
Publications:
Baumgartner C, Constant H, Putet G, Aulagner G. Cutaneous antiseptic efficacy of two ethanol chlorhexidine dilutions for neonatal venepuncture. Journal De Pharmacie Clinique 1998;17:109-12.
Lilley C, Powls A, Gray A. A prospective randomised double blind Comparison of 0.5% versus 0.05% aqueous Chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis prior to line insertion in neonates. Arch. Dis. Child. 2006;91;17-19.