This site became the new ClinicalTrials.gov on June 19th. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more...
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu IMPORTANT: Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more...
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu
Give us feedback

Allogenic Umbilical Cord Blood and Erythropoietin Combination Therapy for Cerebral Palsy

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Sung Kwang Medical Foundation
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01193660
First received: August 29, 2010
Last updated: March 1, 2012
Last verified: March 2012
History of Changes
Results First Received: October 11, 2011  
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized;   Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment;   Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor);   Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition: Cerebral Palsy
Interventions: Biological: Umbilical Cord Blood Infusion
Drug: Erythropoietin Injection
Other: Active Rehabilitation
Other: Placebo Umbilical Cord Blood
Other: Placebo Erythropoietin

  Participant Flow
  Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
Enrollment Period: May 31, 2010 through April 9, 2011 All participants were recruited at CHA Bundang Medical Center.

Pre-Assignment Details
Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
We tried to recruit 106 subjects. Finally 105 patients were enrolled at the beginning of the overall study and none of the participants were washed out before assignment to groups.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Umbilical Cord Blood & Erythropoietin & Rehabilitation Allogeneic umbilical cord blood infusion (total nucleated cells > 3x10^7/kg intravenously), Erythropoietin injection (twice a week for 4 weeks with the dosage of 500 IU/kg for 2 times intravenously and 250 IU/kg subcutaneously for 6 times), and active rehabilitation
Erythropoietin & Rehabilitation Erythropoietin injection (twice a week for 4 weeks with the dosage of 500 IU/kg for 2 times intravenously and 250 IU/kg subcutaneously for 6 times),and active rehabilitation
Only Rehabilitation Active rehabilitation

Participant Flow:   Overall Study
    Umbilical Cord Blood & Erythropoietin & Rehabilitation   Erythropoietin & Rehabilitation   Only Rehabilitation
STARTED   35   36   34 
COMPLETED   31   33   32 
NOT COMPLETED   4   3   2 
Withdrawal by Subject                2                3                1 
Death                1                0                0 
Physician Decision                1                0                1 



  Baseline Characteristics
  Hide Baseline Characteristics

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
No text entered.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Umbilical Cord Blood & Erythropoietin & Rehabilitation Allogeneic umbilical cord blood infusion (total nucleated cells > 3x10^7/kg intravenously), Erythropoietin injection (twice a week for 4 weeks with the dosage of 500 IU/kg for 2 times intravenously and 250 IU/kg subcutaneously for 6 times), and active rehabilitation
Erythropoietin & Rehabilitation Erythropoietin injection (twice a week for 4 weeks with the dosage of 500 IU/kg for 2 times intravenously and 250 IU/kg subcutaneously for 6 times),and active rehabilitation
Only Rehabilitation Active rehabilitation
Total Total of all reporting groups

Baseline Measures
   Umbilical Cord Blood & Erythropoietin & Rehabilitation   Erythropoietin & Rehabilitation   Only Rehabilitation   Total 
Overall Participants Analyzed 
[Units: Participants]
 		 35   36   34   105 
Age 
[Units: Participants]
 		       
<=18 years   35   36   34   105 
Between 18 and 65 years   0   0   0   0 
>=65 years   0   0   0   0 
Age 
[Units: Months]
Mean (Standard Deviation) 		 45.71  (18.91)   50.05  (24.45)   46.0  (19.58)   47.30  (21.07) 
Gender 
[Units: Participants]
 		       
Female   13   11   9   33 
Male   22   25   25   72 
Region of Enrollment 
[Units: Participants]
 		       
Korea, Republic of   35   36   34   105 


  Outcome Measures
  Show All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   Changes in Motor Performance   [ Time Frame: Baseline -1 month - 3 months - 6 months ]
  Show Outcome Measure 1

2.  Primary:   Changes in Standardized Gross Motor Function   [ Time Frame: Baseline - 1 month - 3 months - 6 months ]
  Show Outcome Measure 2

3.  Secondary:   Changes in Cognitive Neurodevelopmental Outcome   [ Time Frame: Baseline -1 month - 3 months - 6 months ]
  Show Outcome Measure 3

4.  Secondary:   Changes in Motor Neurodevelopmental Outcome   [ Time Frame: Baseline - 1 month - 3 months - 6 months ]
  Show Outcome Measure 4

5.  Secondary:   Changes in Brain MRI   [ Time Frame: Baseline - 6 months ]
  Show Outcome Measure 5

6.  Secondary:   Comparison of Changes in Brain Glucose Metabolism Using by Brain 18F-FDG PET: Increased and Decreased Areas of Brain Glucose Metabolism   [ Time Frame: Baseline - 2 weeks ]
  Show Outcome Measure 6

7.  Secondary:   Changes in Functional Performance in Daily Activities   [ Time Frame: Baseline -1 month - 3 months - 6 months ]
  Hide Outcome Measure 7

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Changes in Functional Performance in Daily Activities
Measure Description Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) for assessing functional performance in daily activities in children (All values are adjusted and higher value means better functional performance, 0 - worst, 100 - best). We reported here 2 scales and 3 domains of each scale: a Functional Skill Scale (FSS) and a Caregiver Assistance Scale (CAS) which are divided respectively into 3 domains: self care, mobility, and social function. Categories of outcome table are each domain scores measured at each assessment time point.
Time Frame Baseline -1 month - 3 months - 6 months  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
Intention to treat

Reporting Groups
  Description
Umbilical Cord Blood & Erythropoietin & Rehabilitation Allogeneic umbilical cord blood infusion (total nucleated cells > 3x10^7/kg intravenously), Erythropoietin injection (twice a week for 4 weeks with the dosage of 500 IU/kg for 2 times intravenously and 250 IU/kg subcutaneously for 6 times), and active rehabilitation
Erythropoietin & Rehabilitation Erythropoietin injection (twice a week for 4 weeks with the dosage of 500 IU/kg for 2 times intravenously and 250 IU/kg subcutaneously for 6 times),and active rehabilitation
Only Rehabilitation Active rehabilitation

Measured Values
   Umbilical Cord Blood & Erythropoietin & Rehabilitation   Erythropoietin & Rehabilitation   Only Rehabilitation 
Participants Analyzed 
[Units: Participants]
 		 31   33   32 
Changes in Functional Performance in Daily Activities 
[Units: Units on a scale]
Mean (Standard Error) 		     
Self care of FSS: Baseline   39.1  (2.5)   38.2  (2.7)   37.4  (2.2) 
Self care of FSS: 1 month   42.2  (2.2)   40.4  (2.9)   40.0  (2.2) 
Self care of FSS: 3 months   44.7  (2.4)   43.5  (2.9)   41.7  (2.3) 
Self care of FSS: 6 months   46.5  (2.5)   45.0  (2.8)   42.8  (2.3) 
Mobility of FSS: Baseline   24.8  (3.7)   29.2  (4.3)   24.9  (3.7) 
Mobility of FSS: 1 month   28.1  (3.9)   32.4  (4.3)   27.9  (3.8) 
Mobility of FSS: 3 months   31.7  (4.3)   34.6  (4.3)   29.3  (3.9) 
Mobility of FSS: 6 months   34.6  (4.3)   36.6  (4.4)   31.4  (3.9) 
Social function of FSS: Baseline   40.0  (3.5)   40.1  (3.3)   34.8  (3.5) 
Social function of FSS: 1 month   42.8  (3.6)   42.5  (3.3)   37.5  (3.6) 
Social function of FSS: 3 months   46.4  (3.9)   45.8  (3.3)   40.0  (3.5) 
Social function of FSS: 6 months   49.1  (3.6)   47.8  (3.4)   42.3  (3.9) 
Self care of CAS: Baseline   18.0  (4.1)   17.9  (3.7)   15.3  (3.2) 
Self care of CAS: 1 month   20.1  (4.0)   21.1  (3.8)   19.0  (3.7) 
Self care of CAS: 3 months   27.0  (4.3)   24.2  (3.9)   21.5  (3.7) 
Self care of CAS: 6 months   29.4  (4.0)   26.0  (4.1)   23.1  (3.9) 
Mobility of CAS: Baseline   14.6  (4.1)   19.7  (4.8)   13.5  (4.0) 
Mobility of CAS: 1 month   19.6  (4.5)   22.6  (4.9)   15.6  (4.2) 
Moblity of CAS: 3 months   22.5  (5.1)   26.0  (5.3)   19.3  (4.5) 
Mobility of CAS: 6 months   24.9  (5.5)   29.2  (5.4)   24.0  (4.8) 
Social function of CAS: Baseline   23.0  (5.2)   24.7  (3.9)   18.2  (4.4) 
Social function of CAS: 1 month   28.5  (5.6)   30.0  (4.5)   21.1  (4.8) 
Social function of CAS: 3 months   34.8  (6.0)   34.2  (4.8)   24.2  (5.0) 
Social function of CAS: 6 months   38.4  (6.2)   36.2  (4.6)   27.6  (5.3) 

No statistical analysis provided for Changes in Functional Performance in Daily Activities



8.  Secondary:   Changes in Functional Independence in Daily Activities   [ Time Frame: Baseline - 1 month - 3 months - 6 months ]
  Show Outcome Measure 8

9.  Secondary:   Changes in Muscle Strength   [ Time Frame: Baseline - 1 month - 3 months - 6 months ]
  Show Outcome Measure 9

10.  Secondary:   Changes in Hand Function   [ Time Frame: Baseline - 1 month - 3 months - 6 months ]
  Hide Outcome Measure 10

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Changes in Hand Function
Measure Description QUEST (Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test) as a standardized measurement tool for assessing hand function consisting of sub-scales; dissociated movement, grasps, weight bearing, and protective extension. These are standardized to range from zero (or below zero in grasp section) to 100 and higher values mean better hand function. We reported QUEST differences between each assessment times.
Time Frame Baseline - 1 month - 3 months - 6 months  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
Intention to treat

Reporting Groups
  Description
Umbilical Cord Blood & Erythropoietin & Rehabilitation Allogeneic umbilical cord blood infusion (total nucleated cells > 3x10^7/kg intravenously), Erythropoietin injection (twice a week for 4 weeks with the dosage of 500 IU/kg for 2 times intravenously and 250 IU/kg subcutaneously for 6 times), and active rehabilitation
Erythropoietin & Rehabilitation Erythropoietin injection (twice a week for 4 weeks with the dosage of 500 IU/kg for 2 times intravenously and 250 IU/kg subcutaneously for 6 times),and active rehabilitation
Only Rehabilitation Active rehabilitation

Measured Values
   Umbilical Cord Blood & Erythropoietin & Rehabilitation   Erythropoietin & Rehabilitation   Only Rehabilitation 
Participants Analyzed 
[Units: Participants]
 		 31   33   32 
Changes in Hand Function 
[Units: Units on a scale]
Mean (Standard Error) 		     
Baseline   36.0  (6.4)   52.8  (4.9)   43.0  (5.5) 
1 month - Baseline   5.0  (1.4)   5.7  (1.7)   6.6  (1.4) 
3 months - Baseline   11.1  (2.2)   8.8  (2.0)   10.5  (1.8) 
6 months - Baseline   13.9  (2.6)   10.7  (2.2)   13.0  (2.4) 
3 months - 1 month   5.7  (1.6)   3.1  (1.0)   3.5  (1.7) 
6 months - 1 month   8.4  (2.0)   5.1  (1.3)   6.4  (2.1) 
6 months - 3 months   2.8  (0.8)   2.4  (0.8)   3.1  (1.2) 


Statistical Analysis 1 for Changes in Hand Function
Groups [1] All groups
Statistical Test Type [2] Superiority or Other
Statistical Method [3] Repeated Measure ANOVA
P Value [4] <0.05
Wilks' Lambda (group*visit effect) [5] 0.56
[1] Additional details about the analysis, such as null hypothesis and power calculation:
  In our analysis, the null hypothesis is that the effects of 3 experimental groups are same, and the alternative hypothesis is that the therapeutic effect of combination intervention Group (Umbilical Cord Blood + Erythropoietin + Rehabilitation) is higher than that of either Erythropoietin + Rehabilitation or Rehabilitation Group. This is a pilot study and power calculation was not applicable. The sample size of each group is over 30 and is considered to follow approximately normal distribution.
[2] Details of power calculation, definition of non-inferiority margin, and other key parameters:
  No text entered.
[3] Other relevant method information, such as adjustments or degrees of freedom:
  No text entered.
[4] Additional information, such as whether or not the p-value is adjusted for multiple comparisons and the a priori threshold for statistical significance:
  No text entered.
[5] Other relevant estimation information:
  No text entered.



11.  Secondary:   Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety,Which Are Related to Umbilical Cord Blood, Erythropoietin, or Immunosuppressant   [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
  Show Outcome Measure 11


  Serious Adverse Events
  Show Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events
  Show Other Adverse Events


  Limitations and Caveats
  Hide Limitations and Caveats

Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.


  More Information
  Show More Information