Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Prolapse
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01097200|
Recruitment Status : Active, not recruiting
First Posted : April 1, 2010
Last Update Posted : June 8, 2018
American Medical Systems
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Francisco Carmona, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
No Study Results Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for this Study
|Recruitment Status :||Active, not recruiting|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||November 2016|
|Estimated Study Completion Date :||May 2020|
Sanses TV, Shahryarinejad A, Molden S, Hoskey KA, Abbasy S, Patterson D, Saks EK, Weber LeBrun EE, Gamble TL, King VG, Nguyen AL, Abed H, Young SB; Fellows' Pelvic Research Network. Anatomic outcomes of vaginal mesh procedure (Prolift) compared with uterosacral ligament suspension and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a Fellows' Pelvic Research Network study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;201(5):519.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.004. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
Cosson M, Rosenthal C, Clave H, et al. Prospective clinical assessment of the total transvaginal mesh (TVM) technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse-6 and 12 month results. Int Urogynecol J 2006; 17: S142.