Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Stribild Versus Atripla in Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Type 1 (HIV-1) Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults

This study has been completed.

Sponsor:

Information provided by (Responsible Party):

Gilead Sciences

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:

NCT01095796

First received: March 17, 2010

Last updated: October 15, 2015

Last verified: October 2015

History of Changes

Results First Received: September 20, 2012

Study Type:	Interventional
Study Design:	Allocation: Randomized; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor); Primary Purpose: Treatment
Conditions:	HIV HIV Infections
Interventions:	Drug: Stribild Drug: Atripla Drug: Stribild Placebo Drug: Atripla Placebo

Participant Flow

Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details

Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
Participants were enrolled at sites in the United States and Puerto Rico. The first participant was screened on 16 March 2010. The last study visit occurred on 02 September 2014.

Pre-Assignment Details

Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
917 participants were screened.

Reporting Groups

	Description
Stribild	Stribild® (elvitegravir (EVG) 150 mg/cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) 300 mg) single-tablet regimen (STR) once daily plus placebo to match Atripla once daily prior to bedtime
Atripla	Atripla® (efavirenz (EFV) 600 mg/FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg) tablet once daily prior to bedtime plus placebo to match Stribild once daily

Participant Flow: Overall Study

	Stribild	Atripla
STARTED	353	354
COMPLETED	58	65
NOT COMPLETED	295	289
Randomized but Not Treated	5	2
Adverse Event	9	19
Death	3	2
Pregnancy	2	0
Lack of Efficacy	5	3
Investigator's Discretion	7	2
Withdrew Consent	16	22
Lost to Follow-up	27	29
Participant Noncompliance	5	10
Protocol Violation	1	0
Participant Transferred to Another Study	215	200

Baseline Characteristics

Show Baseline Characteristics

Outcome Measures

Show All Outcome Measures

1. Primary:

The Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success Using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-Defined Snapshot Analysis as Determined by the Achievement of HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]

Show Outcome Measure 1

2. Secondary:

The Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success Using the FDA-Defined Snapshot Analysis as Determined by the Achievement of HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 96 [ Time Frame: Week 96 ]

Show Outcome Measure 2

3. Secondary:

The Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success Using the FDA-Defined Snapshot Analysis as Determined by the Achievement of HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 144 [ Time Frame: Week 144 ]

Show Outcome Measure 3

4. Secondary:

The Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success Using the FDA-Defined Snapshot Analysis as Determined by the Achievement of HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 192 [ Time Frame: Week 192 ]

Show Outcome Measure 4

5. Secondary:

The Percentage of Participants Achieving and Maintaining Confirmed HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 Using the FDA-defined Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR) Algorithm [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]

Show Outcome Measure 5

6. Secondary:

The Change From Baseline in Cluster Determinant 4 (CD4) Cell Count at Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192 [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, and 192 ]

Show Outcome Measure 6

7. Secondary:

The Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 48 [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]

Show Outcome Measure 7

Serious Adverse Events

Show Serious Adverse Events

Other Adverse Events

Show Other Adverse Events

Limitations and Caveats

Hide Limitations and Caveats

Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
There were no limitations affecting the analysis or results.

More Information

Hide More Information

Certain Agreements:

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

The agreement is:

The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.

The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is more than 60 days but less than or equal to 180 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.

Other disclosure agreement that restricts the right of the PI to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Restriction Description:

After conclusion of the study and without prior written approval from Gilead, investigators in this study may communicate, orally present, or publish in scientific journals or other media only after the following conditions have been met:

The results of the study in their entirety have been publicly disclosed by or with the consent of Gilead in an abstract, manuscript, or presentation form; or
The study has been completed at all study sites for at least 2 years

Results Point of Contact:

Name/Title: Clinical Trial Disclosures
Organization: Gilead Sciences, Inc.
e-mail: ClinicalTrialDisclosures@gilead.com

Publications of Results:

Sax PE, DeJesus E, Mills A, Zolopa A, Cohen C, Wohl D, Gallant JE, Liu HC, Zhong L, Yale K, White K, Kearney BP, Szwarcberg J, Quirk E, Cheng AK; GS-US-236-0102 study team. Co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir versus co-formulated efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial, analysis of results after 48 weeks. Lancet. 2012 Jun 30;379(9835):2439-48. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60917-9. Erratum in: Lancet. 2012 Aug 25;380(9843):730.

Zolopa A, Sax PE, DeJesus E, Mills A, Cohen C, Wohl D, Gallant JE, Liu HC, Plummer A, White KL, Cheng AK, Rhee MS, Szwarcberg J; GS-US-236-0102 Study Team. A randomized double-blind comparison of coformulated elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: analysis of week 96 results. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013 May 1;63(1):96-100. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318289545c.

Wohl DA, Cohen C, Gallant JE, Mills A, Sax PE, Dejesus E, Zolopa A, Liu HC, Plummer A, White KL, Cheng AK, Rhee MS, Szwarcberg J; GS-US-236-0102 Study Team. A randomized, double-blind comparison of single-tablet regimen elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF versus single-tablet regimen efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: analysis of week 144 results. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014 Mar 1;65(3):e118-20. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000057.

Responsible Party:	Gilead Sciences
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:	NCT01095796 History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers:	GS-US-236-0102
Study First Received:	March 17, 2010
Results First Received:	September 20, 2012
Last Updated:	October 15, 2015

To Top