Clinical Study on the Efficiency of Three Different Attachment Systems for Implant-supported Mandibular Overdenture
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01034930|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : December 18, 2009
Last Update Posted : February 4, 2015
Concordia Dent Srl
ITI International Team for Implantology, Switzerland
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Corina Marilena Cristache, Concordia Dent Srl
No Study Results Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for this Study
|Recruitment Status :||Completed|
|Actual Primary Completion Date :||September 2009|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||December 2012|
Publications of Results:
Cristache CM, Ionescu C, Cristache G, Ionescu I, Iliescu AA, Burlibasa M. A 5-year prospective randomised clinical trial on the efficiency of two different attachment systems as retention for implant-supported mandibular overdenture. Radiographic assessment, cost analysis and final evaluation of treatment's success. Metalurgia International vol. XIV (2009)Special Issue nr. 16:27-34.
Cristache CM, Ionescu C, Burlibasa M, Cristache G, Iliescu AA, Dumitriu HT. Retentive anchors versus magnets as attachment systems for mandibular overdenture. A 5-year prospective randomised clinical study.Metalurgia International vol. XIV (2009) special issue no.16: 59-64
Thomason JM, Feine J, Exley C, Moynihan P, Müller F, Naert I, Ellis JS, Barclay C, Butterworth C, Scott B, Lynch C, Stewardson D, Smith P, Welfare R, Hyde P, McAndrew R, Fenlon M, Barclay S, Barker D. Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients--the York Consensus Statement. Br Dent J. 2009 Aug 22;207(4):185-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.728.
Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Batenburg RH, Vissink A. Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Sep;36(9):799-806. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01442.x. Epub 2009 Jun 26.
Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Batenburg RH, Visser A, Vissink A. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jul;20(7):722-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01710.x. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
Naert I, Alsaadi G, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M. A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: peri-implant outcome. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Sep-Oct;19(5):695-702.
Naert I, Alsaadi G, Quirynen M. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study. Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Jul-Aug;17(4):401-10.
Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, Head T, Lund JP, MacEntee M, Mericske-Stern R, Mojon P, Morais J, Naert I, Payne AG, Penrod J, Stoker GT, Tawse-Smith A, Taylor TD, Thomason JM, Thomson WM, Wismeijer D. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Montreal, Quebec, May 24-25, 2002. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 Jul-Aug;17(4):601-2. Review.
Boerrigter EM, van Oort RP, Raghoebar GM, Stegenga B, Schoen PJ, Boering G. A controlled clinical trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: clinical aspects. J Oral Rehabil. 1997 Mar;24(3):182-90.
van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I, Maffei G, Jacobs R. Marginal bone loss around implants retaining hinging mandibular overdentures, at 4-, 8- and 12-years follow-up. J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Jul;28(7):628-33.