This site became the new ClinicalTrials.gov on June 19th. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more...
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu IMPORTANT: Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more...
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu
Give us feedback

Nexavar® Versus Placebo in Locally Advanced/Metastatic RAI-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsor:
Collaborator:
Amgen
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Bayer
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00984282
First received: September 24, 2009
Last updated: January 13, 2017
Last verified: January 2017
Results First Received: August 19, 2013  
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized;   Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment;   Masking: Double Blind (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor);   Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition: Thyroid Neoplasms
Interventions: Drug: Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)
Drug: Placebo

  Participant Flow


  Baseline Characteristics
  Hide Baseline Characteristics

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
No text entered.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006) Participants received 2 tablets of Sorafenib (2×200 mg) orally twice daily (12 hours apart without food), 28 days comprise a cycle.
Placebo Participants received 2 tablets of Sorafenib-matching placebo orally twice daily (12 hours apart without food), 28 days comprise a cycle.
Total Total of all reporting groups

Baseline Measures
   Sorafenib (Nexavar, BAY43-9006)   Placebo   Total 
Overall Participants Analyzed 
[Units: Participants]
 207   210   417 
Age 
[Units: Years]
Mean (Standard Deviation)
 61.5  (11.2)   62.0  (11.7)   61.8  (11.4) 
Age, Customized 
[Units: Participants]
     
< 60 years   80   81   161 
>= 60 years   127   129   256 
Gender 
[Units: Participants]
Count of Participants
     
Female      103  49.8%      115  54.8%      218  52.3% 
Male      104  50.2%      95  45.2%      199  47.7% 
Geographic region 
[Units: Participants]
     
Europe   124   125   249 
North America   36   36   72 
Asia   47   49   96 
ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status [1] 
[Units: Participants]
     
Missing   1   1   2 
 130   129   259 
 69   74   143 
 7   6   13 
[1] The ECOG PS required for the study was 0 (fully active), 1 (restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature), or 2 (ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours)
Site of target/nontarget lesions at baseline - organ class [1] 
[Units: Participants]
     
Lung   178   181   359 
Lymph node   113   101   214 
Bone   57   56   113 
[1] Participants could have had more than one site.


  Outcome Measures
  Show All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Central Assessment Incl. Clinical Progression Due to Bone Irradiation   [ Time Frame: Final analysis to be performed when approximately 267 progression-free survival events (centrally assessed) had occurred, study duration approximately three years ]

2.  Secondary:   Overall Survival (OS)   [ Time Frame: From randomization of the first subject until the database cut-off (14 Jul 2015), study duration approximately six years ]

3.  Secondary:   Time to Progression (TTP) Based on Central Assessment Incl. Clinical Progression Due to Bone Irradiation   [ Time Frame: From randomization of the first subject until the database cut-off (31 Aug 2012), study duration approximately three years ]

4.  Secondary:   Disease Control Rate (DCR) Based on Central Assessment   [ Time Frame: From randomization of the first subject until the database cut-off (31 Aug 2012), study duration approximately three years ]

5.  Secondary:   Response Rate Based on Central Assessment   [ Time Frame: From randomization of the first subject until the database cut-off (31 Aug 2012), study duration approximately three years ]

6.  Secondary:   Duration of Response (DOR) Based on Central Assessment   [ Time Frame: From randomization of the first subject until the database cut-off (31 Aug 2012), study duration approximately three years ]

7.  Secondary:   Maximum Percent Reduction in Target Lesion Size Based on Central Assessment   [ Time Frame: From randomization of the first subject until the database cut-off (31 Aug 2012), study duration approximately three years ]

8.  Secondary:   AUC(0-12h),ss (Area Under the Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to 12 Hours at Steady State)   [ Time Frame: A single pharmacokinetic plasma sample was collected at steady state (after 14 days of uninterrupted, unmodified sorafenib dosing) ]


  Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events


  Limitations and Caveats
  Hide Limitations and Caveats

Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.


  More Information
  Hide More Information

Certain Agreements:  
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
The agreement is:
unchecked The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
unchecked The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is more than 60 days but less than or equal to 180 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.


Results Point of Contact:  
Name/Title: Therapeutic Area Head
Organization: BAYER
e-mail: clinical-trials-contact@bayerhealthcare.com


Publications of Results:
Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):

Responsible Party: Bayer
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00984282     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 14295
2009-012007-25 ( EudraCT Number )
Study First Received: September 24, 2009
Results First Received: August 19, 2013
Last Updated: January 13, 2017