We are updating the design of this site. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Safety and Efficacy Study of MDV3100 in Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Been Previously Treated With Docetaxel-based Chemotherapy (AFFIRM)

This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsor:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00974311
First Posted: September 10, 2009
Last Update Posted: March 19, 2014
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Collaborator:
Astellas Pharma Inc
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Medivation, Inc.
Results First Submitted: September 28, 2012  
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized;   Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment;   Masking: Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor);   Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition: Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Interventions: Drug: Enzalutamide
Drug: Placebo

  Participant Flow
  Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
Multicenter, global clinical trial

Pre-Assignment Details
Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either Enzalutamide or placebo

Reporting Groups
  Description
Enzalutamide Participants received 160 mg Enzalutamide orally per day. Treatment continued until unacceptable toxicity, confirmed disease progression and the patient was scheduled to initiate a new systemic antineoplastic therapy, death, or withdrawal.
Placebo Participants received placebo tablets orally once a day. Treatment continued until unacceptable toxicity, confirmed disease progression and the patient was scheduled to initiate a new systemic antineoplastic therapy, death, or withdrawal.

Participant Flow:   Overall Study
    Enzalutamide   Placebo
STARTED   800   399 
COMPLETED   254 [1]   163 [1] 
NOT COMPLETED   546   236 
Lost to Follow-up                1                1 
Death                305                211 
Withdrawal of consent                9                5 
Continuing Treatment                231                19 
[1] Indicates participants continuing long-term follow-up as of 25 September 2011.



  Baseline Characteristics


  Outcome Measures
  Show All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   Overall Survival   [ Time Frame: During study period (up to 3 years) ]

2.  Secondary:   Radiographic Progression-free Survival   [ Time Frame: During study period (up to 3 years) ]

3.  Secondary:   Time to First Skeletal-related Event   [ Time Frame: During study period (up to 3 years) ]

4.  Secondary:   Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P)   [ Time Frame: During study period (up to 3 years) ]

5.  Secondary:   Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression   [ Time Frame: Baseline and at every study visit from week 13 while on study drug (up to 3 years) ]

6.  Secondary:   Percentage of Patients With Pain Palliation   [ Time Frame: During study period (up to 3 years) ]

7.  Secondary:   Percentage of Patients With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response   [ Time Frame: During study period (up to 3 years) ]

8.  Secondary:   Percentage of Patients With Soft-tissue Objective Response   [ Time Frame: During study period (up to 3 years) ]

9.  Secondary:   European Quality of Life Five-Domain Scale (EQ-5D)   [ Time Frame: At Week 13 visit ]
Results not yet reported.   Anticipated Reporting Date:   12/2013  

10.  Secondary:   Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Conversion Rate   [ Time Frame: During study period (up to 3 years) ]
Results not yet reported.   Anticipated Reporting Date:   No text entered.  


  Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events


  Limitations and Caveats
  Hide Limitations and Caveats

Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.


  More Information