We updated the design of this site on September 25th. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

S0910 Epratuzumab, Cytarabine, and Clofarabine in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsor:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00945815
First Posted: July 24, 2009
Last Update Posted: May 18, 2017
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Collaborator:
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Southwest Oncology Group
Results First Submitted: November 13, 2013  
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment;   Masking: None (Open Label);   Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition: Leukemia
Interventions: Biological: epratuzumab
Drug: clofarabine
Drug: cytarabine
Other: laboratory biomarker analysis

  Participant Flow
  Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
No text entered.

Pre-Assignment Details
Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
No text entered.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Ara-C + Clofarabine + Epratuzumab Ara-C 1 g/m2/d IV Days 1-5, clofarabine 40 mg/m2/d IV Days 2-6, epratuzumab 360 mg/m2/d IV Days 7, 14, 21, 28, acetaminophen 650 mg/d PO Days 7, 14, 21, 28, dephenhydramine 50 mg/d IV Days 7, 14, 21, 28, IT methotrexate 12 mg IT at least 1 wk apart during induction. 1 cycle=28 days. Maximum of one cycle.

Participant Flow:   Overall Study
    Ara-C + Clofarabine + Epratuzumab
STARTED   35 
Eligible   32 
Eligible and Began Protocol Therapy   31 
COMPLETED   27 
NOT COMPLETED   8 
Death                3 
Not protocol specified                1 
Ineligible                3 
Did not begin protocol therapy                1 



  Baseline Characteristics
  Hide Baseline Characteristics

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
Eligible patients who began protocol therapy were included in this analysis.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Ara-C + Clofarabine + Epratuzumab Ara-C 1 g/m2/d IV Days 1-5, clofarabine 40 mg/m2/d IV Days 2-6, epratuzumab 360 mg/m2/d IV Days 7, 14, 21, 28, acetaminophen 650 mg/d PO Days 7, 14, 21, 28, dephenhydramine 50 mg/d IV Days 7, 14, 21, 28, IT methotrexate 12 mg IT at least 1 wk apart during induction. 1 cycle=28 days. Maximum of one cycle.

Baseline Measures
   Ara-C + Clofarabine + Epratuzumab 
Overall Participants Analyzed 
[Units: Participants]
 31 
Age 
[Units: Years]
Median (Full Range)
 41 
 (21 to 69) 
Sex: Female, Male 
[Units: Participants]
Count of Participants
 
Female      8  25.8% 
Male      23  74.2% 
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) 
[Units: Participants]
Count of Participants
 
Hispanic or Latino      11  35.5% 
Not Hispanic or Latino      18  58.1% 
Unknown or Not Reported      2   6.5% 
Race (NIH/OMB) 
[Units: Participants]
Count of Participants
 
American Indian or Alaska Native      0   0.0% 
Asian      1   3.2% 
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander      0   0.0% 
Black or African American      1   3.2% 
White      26  83.9% 
More than one race      0   0.0% 
Unknown or Not Reported      3   9.7% 


  Outcome Measures
  Show All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   Complete Remission   [ Time Frame: After induction therapy was completed (1 or 2 months) ]

2.  Secondary:   Number of Patients With Grade 3 Through 5 Treatment-Related Adverse Events   [ Time Frame: Up to 5 years ]


  Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events


  Limitations and Caveats
  Hide Limitations and Caveats

Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.


  More Information