Now Available: Final Rule for FDAAA 801 and NIH Policy on Clinical Trial Reporting

Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Stribild Versus Atripla in Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Type 1 (HIV-1) Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Gilead Sciences
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00869557
First received: March 24, 2009
Last updated: May 22, 2014
Last verified: May 2014
Results First Received: September 20, 2012  
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized;   Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study;   Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment;   Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor);   Primary Purpose: Treatment
Conditions: HIV
HIV Infections
Interventions: Drug: Stribild
Drug: Atripla

  Participant Flow


  Baseline Characteristics
  Hide Baseline Characteristics

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
Safety Analysis Set: participants were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Stribild Stribild QD and placebo to match Atripla QHS were administered during the double-blind phase. Stribild QD was administered during the extension phase.
Atripla Atripla QHS and placebo to match Stribild QD were administered during the double blind phase. Stribild QD was administered during the extension phase.
Total Total of all reporting groups

Baseline Measures
   Stribild   Atripla   Total 
Overall Participants Analyzed 
[Units: Participants]
 48   23   71 
Age 
[Units: Participants]
     
<=18 years   0   0   0 
Between 18 and 65 years   48   23   71 
>=65 years   0   0   0 
Age 
[Units: Years]
Mean (Standard Deviation)
 36  (8.9)   35  (9.6)   36  (9.1) 
Gender 
[Units: Participants]
     
Female   4   2   6 
Male   44   21   65 
Race/Ethnicity, Customized 
[Units: Participants]
     
American Indian or Alaska Native   1   0   1 
Asian   1   0   1 
Black   12   5   17 
White   33   18   51 
Other   1   0   1 
Region of Enrollment 
[Units: Participants]
     
United States   48   23   71 
HIV Disease Status 
[Units: Participants]
     
Asymptomatic   40   22   62 
Symptomatic HIV Infections   5   0   5 
AIDS   3   1   4 
Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Infection Status 
[Units: Participants]
     
Negative   48   23   71 
Positive   0   0   0 
Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection Status 
[Units: Participants]
     
Negative   48   23   71 
Positive   0   0   0 
HIV-1 RNA Category (copies/mL) 
[Units: Participants]
     
≤ 100,000   37   18   55 
> 100,000   11   5   16 
Cluster Determinant 4 (CD4) Cell Count (/µL) 
[Units: Participants]
     
≤ 50   0   0   0 
51 to ≤ 200   7   0   7 
201 to ≤ 350   17   8   25 
351 to ≤ 500   14   5   19 
> 500   10   10   20 


  Outcome Measures
  Show All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   The Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Less Than 50 Copies/mL at Week 24   [ Time Frame: Week 24 ]

2.  Secondary:   The Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL at Week 48   [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]

3.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in HIV-1 RNA (log_10 Copies/mL)   [ Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 ]

4.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Cluster Determinant 4 (CD4) Cell Count at Week 24   [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 ]

5.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 48   [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 48 ]

6.  Secondary:   The Percentage of Participants With Virologic Success at Weeks 24 and 48 Using FDA-Defined Snapshot Analysis and HIV-1 RNA Less Than 50 Copies/mL   [ Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 24 and 48 ]


  Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events


  Limitations and Caveats
  Hide Limitations and Caveats

Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.


  More Information