Now Available: Final Rule for FDAAA 801 and NIH Policy on Clinical Trial Reporting

Efficacy and Safety of RAD001 in Patients Aged 18 and Over With Angiomyolipoma Associated With Either Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) or Sporadic Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) (EXIST-2)

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Novartis ( Novartis Pharmaceuticals )
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00790400
First received: November 10, 2008
Last updated: January 26, 2016
Last verified: January 2016
Results First Received: May 23, 2012  
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized;   Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study;   Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment;   Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor);   Primary Purpose: Treatment
Conditions: Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC)
Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM)
Interventions: Drug: Everolimus (RAD001)
Drug: Placebo

  Participant Flow


  Baseline Characteristics
  Hide Baseline Characteristics

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
No text entered.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Everolimus Study drug was given by continuous oral daily dosing of two 5 mg tablets.
Placebo Placebo was given by continuous oral daily dosing of two 5 mg tablets.
Total Total of all reporting groups

Baseline Measures
   Everolimus   Placebo   Total 
Overall Participants Analyzed 
[Units: Participants]
 79   39   118 
Age 
[Units: Years]
Mean (Standard Deviation)
 32.5  (10.37)   31.0  (9.64)   32.0  (10.12) 
Age, Customized 
[Units: Participants]
     
<30 years   35   20   55 
≥ 30 years   44   19   63 
Gender 
[Units: Participants]
     
Female   52   26   78 
Male   27   13   40 


  Outcome Measures
  Show All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   Angiomyolipoma Response Rate as Per Central Radiology Review (Double-blind Period)   [ Time Frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or analysis cut-off date (30-June-2011). ]

2.  Secondary:   Time to Angiomyolipoma Progression as Per Central Radiology Review (Double-blind Period)   [ Time Frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or analysis cut-off date (30-June-2011). ]

3.  Secondary:   Skin Lesion Response Rate as Per Investigator (Only Patients With at Least One Skin Lesion at Baseline)   [ Time Frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or analysis cut-off date (30-June-2011). ]
  Hide Outcome Measure 3

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title Skin Lesion Response Rate as Per Investigator (Only Patients With at Least One Skin Lesion at Baseline)
Measure Description Skin lesion response rate in the double-blind period was determined only among patients with at least one skin lesion at baseline, and is the percentage of this group of patients with a best overall skin lesion response on the Physician’s Global Assessment of Clinical Condition (PGA) of either complete clinical response (CCR) or partial response (PR).
Time Frame From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or analysis cut-off date (30-June-2011).  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) is defined according to the Intention-to-Treat principle and consists of all randomized patients. Patients were to be analyzed according to the treatment that they were assigned at randomization.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Everolimus Study drug was given by continuous oral daily dosing of two 5 mg tablets.
Placebo Placebo was given by continuous oral daily dosing of two 5 mg tablets.

Measured Values
   Everolimus   Placebo 
Participants Analyzed 
[Units: Participants]
 77   37 
Skin Lesion Response Rate as Per Investigator (Only Patients With at Least One Skin Lesion at Baseline) 
[Units: Percentage of participants]
Number (95% Confidence Interval)
 26 
 (16.6 to 37.2) 
 0 
 (0.0 to 9.5) 

No statistical analysis provided for Skin Lesion Response Rate as Per Investigator (Only Patients With at Least One Skin Lesion at Baseline)



4.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With Renal Impairment   [ Time Frame: From date of randomization until the earliest date of first documented AML progression, date of further anti-AML medication (including open-label Everolimus)/surgery or analysis cut-off date (30-June-2011). ]

5.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Plasma Angiogenic Molecules   [ Time Frame: Baseline, 12 Months ]
Results not yet reported.   Anticipated Reporting Date:   09/2016   Safety Issue:   No


  Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events


  Limitations and Caveats
  Hide Limitations and Caveats

Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.


  More Information