ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Comparative Study of AESCULAP Optilene® Mesh Elastic Versus Ethicon Ultrapro® Mesh in Incisional Hernia Repair (Optilene)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00646334
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : March 28, 2008
Last Update Posted : May 28, 2015
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Aesculap AG

No Study Results Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for this Study
  Recruitment Status : Completed
  Actual Primary Completion Date : September 2010
  Actual Study Completion Date : September 2010
Publications of Results:
Other Publications:
Schumpelick V, Arlt G, Klinge U. [Versorgung von Nabelhernien und Narbenhernien]. Dt. Aerzteblatt 94, Heft 51-52. Dez. 1997 (35)
Schumpelick V, Lloyd M. Meshes: benefits and risks, 9 Polypropylene: The standard of Mesh Materials. Nyhus Editors, Springer Verlag, 2004: 101-103
Benhidjeb T, Baerlehner E, Anders S. Laparoskopische Narbenhernien Reparation: Muss das Netz fuer die Intraperitoneale Onlay-Mesh-Technik besondere Eigenschaften haben?; Chir. Gastroenterol. 2003; 19(Suppl.2): 16-22
Rosen HR, Gyasi A; Retromuskulaere Kunststoffnetzimplantation von Narbenhernien; Chir. Gastroenterol.; 2003; 19 (Suppl. 2); 39-45
Rosch R, Junge K, Stumpf M, Klinge U, Schumpelick V, Klosterhalfen B; Welche Anforderungen sollte ein ideales Netz erfuellen?; Chir. Gastroenterol.; 2003; 19 (Suppl. 2); 7-11
Schumpelick V, van Ackeren H, Klinge U; Hernien; Thieme Verlag, 2000; 266-267