ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Different Dilation Durations for Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilatation

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00451581
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified October 2006 by National Taiwan University Hospital.
Recruitment status was:  Recruiting
First Posted : March 23, 2007
Last Update Posted : March 23, 2007
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
National Taiwan University Hospital

No Study Results Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for this Study
  Recruitment Status : Unknown
  Primary Completion Date : No date given
  Estimated Study Completion Date : January 2008
Publications:
1. Bergman JJ, Rauws EA, Fockens P, van Berkel AM, Bossuyt PM, Tijssen JG, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. Randomised trial of endoscopic balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bileduct stones. Lancet 1997;349:1124-9. 2. Komatsu Y, Kawabe T, Toda N, Ohashi M, Isayama M, Tateishi K, Sato S, Koike Y, Yamagata M, Tada M, Shiratori Y, Yamada H, Ihori M, Kawase T, Omata M. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for the management of common bile duct stones: experience of 226 cases. Endoscopy 1998;30:12-7. 3. Lin CK, Lai KH, Chan HH, Tsai WL, Wang EM, Wei MC, Fu MT, Lo CC, Hsu PI, Lo GH. Endoscopic balloon dilatation is a safe method in the management of common bile duct stones. Dig Liver Dis 2004;36:68-72.

Publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):