A Study Designed to Test the Effectiveness and Safety of Treating Patients With Lacosamide for Migraine Prophylaxis (SP906)

This study has been completed.

Sponsor:

Information provided by (Responsible Party):

UCB Pharma

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:

NCT00440518

First received: February 23, 2007

Last updated: September 19, 2014

Last verified: September 2011

History of Changes

Results First Received: August 3, 2009

Study Type:	Interventional
Study Design:	Allocation: Randomized; Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment; Masking: Double Blind (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor); Primary Purpose: Prevention
Condition:	Migraine
Interventions:	Drug: Lacosamide Other: Placebo

Participant Flow

Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details

Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
A multicenter trial with 24 sites with enrolled subjects and 23 sites with randomized subjects from 15 Feb 2007 to 17 Jul 2008.

Pre-Assignment Details

Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
Subjects on stable dose of prophylactic medication entered a 2-week Wash-Out Period followed by a 4-week Baseline Period without any prophylactic medication. Subjects not taking prophylactic medication entered the Baseline Period directly for 6 weeks. Subjects entered a 3-week Titration Period and if completed entered a 14-week Maintenance Period.

Reporting Groups

	Description
Placebo	Placebo immediate-release film coated tablet, oral administration twice daily 12 hours apart
Lacosamide 100mg	Lacosamide 100mg immediate-release film coated tablet, oral administration twice daily 12 hours apart
Lacosamide 300mg	Lacosamide 300mg immediate-release film coated tablet, oral administration twice daily 12 hours apart

Participant Flow for 2 periods

Period 1: Randomized /Titration Period

	Placebo	Lacosamide 100mg	Lacosamide 300mg
STARTED	72	72	74
COMPLETED	59	63	70
NOT COMPLETED	13	9	4
Lack of Efficacy	1	0	1
Subject Withdrew Consent	4	1	0
Protocol Deviation	1	0	0
Unsatisfactory Compliance	2	3	2
Other	1	0	0
Lost to Follow-up	2	2	1
Adverse Event	2	3	0

Period 2: Maintenance and Safety Follow-up Periods

	Placebo	Lacosamide 100mg	Lacosamide 300mg
STARTED	59	63	70
COMPLETED	52	51	55
NOT COMPLETED	7	12	15
Adverse Event	3	4	2
Lack of Efficacy	0	1	1
Subject Withdrew Consent	3	2	4
Unsatisfactory Compliance	0	3	6
Other	0	0	2
Lost to Follow-up	1	2	0

Baseline Characteristics

Show Baseline Characteristics

Outcome Measures

Show All Outcome Measures

1. Primary:

Change From Baseline in Mean Migraine Headache Rates During the Entire 14-week Maintenance Period [ Time Frame: Baseline, Entire 14-week Maintenance Period ]

Show Outcome Measure 1

2. Secondary:

Change From Baseline in Mean Migraine Headache Rates During the Last 4 Weeks of the Maintenance Period [ Time Frame: Baseline, last 4 weeks of the 14-week Maintenance Period ]

Show Outcome Measure 2

3. Secondary:

Number of Subjects Who Experience a 50 Percent or Greater Reduction From Baseline in Migraine Frequency During the Entire 14-week Maintenance Period. [ Time Frame: Baseline, Entire 14-week Maintenance Period ]

Show Outcome Measure 3

4. Secondary:

Number of Subjects Who Experience a 50 Percent or Greater Reduction From Baseline in Migraine Frequency During the Last 4 Weeks of the Maintenance Period. [ Time Frame: Baseline, last 4 weeks of the 14-week Maintenance Period ]

Show Outcome Measure 4

5. Secondary:

Changes From Baseline in Improvement of Function and Reduction of Disability Using the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) [ Time Frame: Baseline, last visit in the 17-week Trial Period ]

Show Outcome Measure 5

Serious Adverse Events

Show Serious Adverse Events

Other Adverse Events

Show Other Adverse Events

Limitations and Caveats

Hide Limitations and Caveats

Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.

More Information

Hide More Information

Certain Agreements:

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

The agreement is:

	The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
	The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is more than 60 days but less than or equal to 180 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
	Other disclosure agreement that restricts the right of the PI to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. Restriction Description: UCB has > 60 days but <= 180 days to review results communications prior to public release and may delete information that compromises ongoing studies or is considered proprietary. This restriction is not intended to compromise the objective scientific integrity of the manuscript, it being understood that results shall be published regardless of outcome.

Results Point of Contact:

Name/Title: Study Director
Organization: UCB Clinical Trial Call Center
phone: +1 877 822 9493

Responsible Party:	UCB Pharma
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:	NCT00440518 History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers:	SP0906
Study First Received:	February 23, 2007
Results First Received:	August 3, 2009
Last Updated:	September 19, 2014

To Top