Now Available: Final Rule for FDAAA 801 and NIH Policy on Clinical Trial Reporting

An Open-label Trial With TMC125 in Patients Who Have Virologically Failed in a DUET Trial (TMC125-C206 or TMC125-C216).

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, Ireland
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00359021
First received: July 28, 2006
Last updated: May 6, 2014
Last verified: May 2014
Results First Received: January 29, 2013  
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Non-Randomized;   Endpoint Classification: Safety Study;   Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment;   Masking: Open Label;   Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition: HIV-1
Intervention: Drug: TMC125

  Participant Flow
  Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
No text entered.

Pre-Assignment Details
Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
Participants with human immunodeficiency virus – type 1 (HIV-1) infection were enrolled in this study from DUET Study TMC125-C206 or TMC125-C216 and met the definition of virologic failure at Week 24 or later in these studies, or who completed one of the DUET studies after 96 weeks of treatment.

Reporting Groups
  Description
DUET PLACEBO Participants who received Placebo in a previous DUET study and received open-label treatment with 200 mg twice daily etravirine, also known as TMC125 (ETR) and 600/100 mg twice daily darunavir (DRV)/low-dose ritonavir (rtv) were referred to as ETR-naïve participants.
DUET TMC125 Participants who received etravirine, also known as TMC125 (ETR) in a previous DUET study and received open-label treatment with 200 mg twice daily ETR and 600/100 mg twice daily darunavir (DRV)/low-dose ritonavir (rtv) were referred to as ETR-experienced participants.

Participant Flow:   Overall Study
    DUET PLACEBO   DUET TMC125
STARTED   256   247 
COMPLETED   175   195 
NOT COMPLETED   81   52 
Adverse Event                26                8 
Subject Non-Compliant                1                2 
Subject Ineligible To Continue The Trial                1                0 
Subject Reached A Virologic Endpoint                45                32 
Withdrawal by Subject                2                9 
Lost to Follow-up                1                0 
Not specified                4                1 
Pregnancy                1                0 



  Baseline Characteristics
  Hide Baseline Characteristics

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
No text entered.

Reporting Groups
  Description
DUET PLACEBO Participants who received Placebo in a previous DUET study and received open-label treatment with 200 mg twice daily etravirine, also known as TMC125 (ETR) and 600/100 mg twice daily darunavir (DRV)/low-dose ritonavir (rtv) were referred to as ETR-naïve participants.
DUET TMC125 Participants who received etravirine, also known as TMC125 (ETR) in a previous DUET study and received open-label treatment with 200 mg twice daily ETR and 600/100 mg twice daily darunavir (DRV)/low-dose ritonavir (rtv) were referred to as ETR-experienced participants.
Total Total of all reporting groups

Baseline Measures
   DUET PLACEBO   DUET TMC125   Total 
Overall Participants Analyzed 
[Units: Participants]
 256   247   503 
Age 
[Units: Participants]
     
<=18 years   0   0   0 
Between 18 and 65 years   252   245   497 
>=65 years   4   2   6 
Age 
[Units: Years]
Mean (Standard Deviation)
 46.9  (8.28)   46.6  (7.01)   46.7  (7.68) 
Gender 
[Units: Participants]
     
Female   27   37   64 
Male   229   210   439 


  Outcome Measures
  Show All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   The Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events   [ Time Frame: 1 week to 180 weeks, with a median of 62 weeks ]

2.  Secondary:   The Percentage of Participants With Virologic Outcomes Over Time   [ Time Frame: Weeks 24, 48, and 96 ]
  Hide Outcome Measure 2

Measure Type Secondary
Measure Title The Percentage of Participants With Virologic Outcomes Over Time
Measure Description The table below shows the percentage of participants with virologic suppression (< 50 copies/mL), the percentage of participants who were virologic failures (VF) (>50 copies/mL, discontinued prior to time X for reasons of VF or for other reasons, except for VF or adverse event, with a last viral load >50 copies/mL), and the percentage of participants with no viral load (VL) data available over time (ie, at Weeks 24, 48, and 96).
Time Frame Weeks 24, 48, and 96  
Safety Issue No  

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was used as the primary analysis population for the efficacy analysis and included all participants who took at least one dose of etravirine (ETR) (also known as TMC125) in the TMC125-C217 study.

Reporting Groups
  Description
DUET PLACEBO Participants who received Placebo in a previous DUET study received open-label treatment with 200 mg twice daily etravirine, also known as TMC125 (ETR) and 600/100 mg twice daily darunavir (DRV)/low-dose ritonavir (rtv) were referred to as ETR-naïve participants.
DUET TMC125 Participants who received etravirine, also known as TMC125 (ETR) in a previous DUET study and received open-label treatment with 200 mg twice daily ETR and 600/100 mg twice daily darunavir (DRV)/low-dose ritonavir (rtv) were referred to as ETR-experienced participants.

Measured Values
   DUET PLACEBO   DUET TMC125 
Participants Analyzed 
[Units: Participants]
 256   247 
The Percentage of Participants With Virologic Outcomes Over Time 
[Units: Percentage of Participants]
   
Week 24 - Virologic Response (<50 cop/mL)   43.0   62.3 
Week 24 - Virologic Failure   46.9   31.6 
Week 24 - No VL Data available   10.2   6.1 
Week 48 - Virologic Response (<50 cop/mL)   35.2   44.5 
Week 48 - Virologic Failure   50.4   31.2 
Week 48 - No VL Data available   14.5   24.3 
Week 96 -Virologic Response (<50 cop/mL)   7.4   4.5 
Week 96 - Virologic Failure   48.0   27.5 
Week 96 - No VL Data available   44.5   68.0 

No statistical analysis provided for The Percentage of Participants With Virologic Outcomes Over Time



3.  Secondary:   Change in Plasma Viral Load Versus Baseline (ie, Mean Change in log10 Plasma Viral Load From Baseline Over Time)   [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, and Week 96 ]


  Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events


  Limitations and Caveats
  Hide Limitations and Caveats

Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.


  More Information