This site became the new ClinicalTrials.gov on June 19th. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more...
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu IMPORTANT: Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more...
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu
Give us feedback

A Study to Compare Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Versus Adefovir Dipivoxil for the Treatment of HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Gilead Sciences
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00117676
First received: June 30, 2005
Last updated: January 16, 2017
Last verified: January 2017
Results First Received: February 11, 2010  
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized;   Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment;   Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor);   Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition: Chronic Hepatitis B
Interventions: Drug: TDF
Drug: ADV
Drug: TDF placebo
Drug: ADV placebo
Drug: FTC/TDF

  Participant Flow


  Baseline Characteristics
  Hide Baseline Characteristics

Population Description
Explanation of how the number of participants for analysis was determined. Includes whether analysis was per protocol, intention to treat, or another method. Also provides relevant details such as imputation technique, as appropriate.
Randomized and Treated Analysis Set: all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication

Reporting Groups
  Description
TDF-TDF TDF 300 mg plus placebo to match ADV (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added emtricitabine (FTC) to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period.
ADV-TDF ADV 10 mg plus placebo to match TDF (double-blind period), followed by TDF 300 mg (open-label period). Participants may have added FTC to their treatment regimen (as part of FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC tablet) in the open-label period.
Total Total of all reporting groups

Baseline Measures
   TDF-TDF   ADV-TDF   Total 
Overall Participants Analyzed 
[Units: Participants]
 250   125   375 
Age 
[Units: Participants]
Count of Participants
     
<=18 years      0   0.0%      1   0.8%      1   0.3% 
Between 18 and 65 years      247  98.8%      123  98.4%      370  98.7% 
>=65 years      3   1.2%      1   0.8%      4   1.1% 
Age 
[Units: Years]
Mean (Standard Deviation)
 44  (10.6)   43  (10.0)   44  (10.4) 
Gender 
[Units: Participants]
Count of Participants
     
Female      57  22.8%      28  22.4%      85  22.7% 
Male      193  77.2%      97  77.6%      290  77.3% 
Race/Ethnicity, Customized 
[Units: Participants]
     
American Indian or Alaska Native   0   0   0 
Asian   63   30   93 
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander   7   2   9 
Black or African American   8   4   12 
White   161   81   242 
More than one race   0   0   0 
Unknown or Not Reported   11   8   19 
Region of Enrollment 
[Units: Participants]
     
United States   25   11   36 
Greece   19   9   28 
Spain   15   6   21 
Turkey   11   3   14 
Italy   6   0   6 
United Kingdom   5   2   7 
France   13   5   18 
Czech Republic   7   5   12 
Canada   29   18   47 
Poland   13   11   24 
Australia   14   8   22 
Bulgaria   49   23   72 
Germany   19   11   30 
Netherlands   1   1   2 
New Zealand   24   12   36 
Baseline Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Above the Upper Limit of the Normal (ULN) Range [1] 
[Units: Participants]
     
Yes   236   118   354 
No   14   7   21 
[1] The ULN was 43 U/L for males and 34 U/L for females aged 18 to < 69, and 35 U/L for males and 32 U/L for females aged ≥ 69.
Prior Lamivudine or FTC Treatment 
[Units: Participants]
     
Yes   43   23   66 
No   207   102   309 
Baseline Hepatitis B Virus Deoxyribonucleic Acid (HBV DNA) 
[Units: Log10 copies/mL]
Mean (Standard Deviation)
 6.86  (1.308)   6.98  (1.266)   6.90  (1.294) 
Baseline Knodell Necroinflammatory Score [1] 
[Units: Units on a scale]
Mean (Standard Deviation)
 7.8  (2.45)   7.8  (2.20)   7.8  (2.37) 
[1] Based on Knodell numerical scoring of liver biopsy specimens. The Knodell necroinflammatory score is the combined necrosis and inflammation domain scores and ranges 0 (best) to 14 (worst).


  Outcome Measures
  Show All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL and Histological Improvement (2-point Reduction in Knodell Necroinflammatory Score Without Worsening in Knodell Fibrosis Score) at Week 48   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Week 48 ]

2.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Week 48   [ Time Frame: Week 48 ]

3.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 96   [ Time Frame: Week 96 ]

4.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384   [ Time Frame: Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384 ]

5.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA < 400 Copies/mL at Weeks 432 and 480   [ Time Frame: Weeks 432 and 480 ]

6.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480 ]

7.  Secondary:   Change From Week 48 in HBV DNA at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480   [ Time Frame: Week 48; Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480 ]

8.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 48   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Week 48 ]

9.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With Histological Response at Week 240   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Week 240 ]

10.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 48   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Week 48 ]

11.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Knodell and Ishak Necroinflammatory Scores at Week 240   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Week 240 ]

12.  Secondary:   Ranked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 48   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Week 48 ]

13.  Secondary:   Ranked Assessment of Necroinflammation and Fibrosis at Week 240   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Week 240 ]

14.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Week 48   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Week 48 ]

15.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 96   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Week 96 ]

16.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, and 384 ]

17.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With ALT Normalization at Weeks 432 and 480   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 432 and 480 ]

18.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480 ]

19.  Secondary:   Change From Week 48 in ALT at Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480   [ Time Frame: Week 48; Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480 ]

20.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B S-Antigen (HBsAg) Loss or Seroconversion Antibody to HBs (Anti-HBs) at Week 48   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Week 48 ]

21.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Week 96   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Week 96 ]

22.  Secondary:   Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss and/or Seroconversion to Anti-HBs at Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288, 336, 384, 432, and 480 ]

23.  Secondary:   Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 48 (Resistance Surveillance)   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Week 48 ]

24.  Secondary:   Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 96 (Resistance Surveillance)   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 49 to 96 ]

25.  Secondary:   Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 144 (Resistance Surveillance)   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 97 to 144 ]

26.  Secondary:   Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 192 (Resistance Surveillance)   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 145 to 192 ]

27.  Secondary:   Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 240 (Resistance Surveillance)   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 193 to 240 ]

28.  Secondary:   Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 288 (Resistance Surveillance)   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 241 to 288 ]

29.  Secondary:   Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 336 (Resistance Surveillance)   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 289 to 336 ]

30.  Secondary:   Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 384 (Resistance Surveillance)   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 337 to 384 ]

31.  Secondary:   Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 432 (Resistance Surveillance)   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 385 to 432 ]

32.  Secondary:   Number of Participants With HBV Genotypic Changes From Baseline at Week 480 (Resistance Surveillance)   [ Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 433 to 480 ]


  Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events


  Limitations and Caveats
  Hide Limitations and Caveats

Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.


  More Information