Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide Compared With Epirubicin and Paclitaxel in Treating Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00002953|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : July 7, 2004
Last Update Posted : December 4, 2013
Medical Research Council
Information provided by:
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
No Study Results Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for this Study
|Recruitment Status :||Completed|
|Primary Completion Date :||No date given|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||November 2005|
Publications of Results:
Langley RE, Carmichael J, Jones AL, Cameron DA, Qian W, Uscinska B, Howell A, Parmar M. Phase III trial of epirubicin plus paclitaxel compared with epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute trial AB01. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 20;23(33):8322-30.
Carmichael J: UKCCCR trial of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) vs. epirubicin and taxol (ET) in the first line treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20: A-84, 2001.
Carmichael J: UKCCCR trial of epirubucin and cyclophosphamide (EC) versus epirubicin and taxol (ET) in the first line treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). [Abstract] Br J Cancer 85 (suppl 1): A-CT6, 2, 2001.