Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide Compared With Epirubicin and Paclitaxel in Treating Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer
This study has been completed.
Medical Research Council
First Posted: July 7, 2004
Last Update Posted: December 4, 2013
Information provided by:
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
No Study Results Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for this Study
|Study Status:||This study has been completed.|
|Study Completion Date:||November 2005|
|Primary Completion Date:||No date given|
Langley RE, Carmichael J, Jones AL, Cameron DA, Qian W, Uscinska B, Howell A, Parmar M. Phase III trial of epirubicin plus paclitaxel compared with epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute trial AB01. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 20;23(33):8322-30.
Carmichael J: UKCCCR trial of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) vs. epirubicin and taxol (ET) in the first line treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20: A-84, 2001.
Carmichael J: UKCCCR trial of epirubucin and cyclophosphamide (EC) versus epirubicin and taxol (ET) in the first line treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). [Abstract] Br J Cancer 85 (suppl 1): A-CT6, 2, 2001.